Today the court first heard a police officer who had conducted investigations concerning the mobile phone of Andr\u00e9 Eminger, which had been logged into cell towers close to the Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe apartment in the morning of 4 November 2011. However, his investigations did not disclose more than that fact, neither was he able to explain why it had only been reported into the case file now.<\/p>\n
Zsch\u00e4pes \u201cold\u201d counsel Heer, Stahl and Sturm read out a long statement on the letter sent by Zsch\u00e4pe to a Neonazi from Dortmund (see the report of\u00a014 September 2016<\/a>), arguing that it may not be considered as evidence as it had become part of the case file illegally. This statement was joined not only by Wohlleben defense attorney Klemke, but also by Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019s further counsel Grasel, showing once more that the disputes within the Zsch\u00e4pe defense are mostly over. It remains to be seen how the court will decide.<\/p>\n The court then read out and viewed several pieces of evidence showing the racist and violent character of the \u201cThuringia Home Guard\u201d and the corresponding ideology of Ralf Wohlleben.
\nThe Wohlleben defense made another attempt to question the chain of evidence concerning the Ceska murder weapon, moving that a police detective from Switzerland be heard as witness.<\/p>\n