Today Zsch\u00e4pe defense counsel Borchert read out the defense\u2019s statement on the Peggy K. case and on images containing child and youth pornography found on a computer in the Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe apartment (see the report of 26 October 2016<\/a>): Zsch\u00e4pe had no information on Peggy K., the computer had been used by all three persons, and she did not know anything about these images \u2013 they had probably gotten there via a used hard disk purchased by Uwe Mundlos and built into the computer. This last statement above all is transparent nonsense \u2013 a sentiment shared even by assigned counsel Heer and Stahl, according to their facial expressions when listening to Borchert\u2019s statement.<\/p>\n Prior to the trial day, the court has decided to formally seize the letter Zsch\u00e4pe had sent to an imprisoned \u201ccomrade\u201d. The court is now planning to introduce it into evidence. This marks the end of rather prolonged proceedings concerning this letter, begun almost three months ago when victims\u2019 counsel moved that it be introduced into evidence (see report of 14.09.2016<\/a>).<\/p>\n The presiding judge and assigned counsel Heer, Stahl and Sturm then had a prolonged discussion concerning when the defense \u2013 and their expert witness \u2013 could be expected to be ready for the in-court expert opinion by Prof. Sa\u00df on Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019s mental state. The court has planned to hear Sa\u00df on 20\/21 December and seems to be holding on to that plan.<\/p>\n After the Wohlleben defense had brought two more desperate motions for evidence, the trial day ended around noon. The trial will continue next Tuesday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Again, Beate Zsch\u00e4pe does not have anything to do with anything. And: Defense tries to delay expert opinion on Zsch\u00e4pe. Today Zsch\u00e4pe defense counsel Borchert read out the defense\u2019s statement on the Peggy K. case and on images containing child and youth pornography found on a computer in the Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe apartment (see the report of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1312"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1313,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312\/revisions\/1313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}