The trial day began with the testimony of another police officer from Jena, asked to testify on accused Wohlleben\u2019s ideology as well as activities by Wohlleben and the Nazi-\u201ccomradeship Jena\u201d concerning \u201cforeigners\u201d. Again, the officer was unable to report anything important \u2013 very few questions by victims\u2019 counsel were enough to show why he and his colleagues in Jena only had knowledge \u201cassaults left wing \u2013 right ring and propaganda offences\u201d: Asked whether he had any knowledge of bands at the concerts organized by Wohlleben performing songs with racist lyrics, the witness answered that he had not. Further asked whether the lyrics had been checked for illegal content, he replied that this had \u201cnot been usual back then\u201d. Small wonder that Wohlleben had introduced the officer to the then-chairman of Nazi party NPD by saying \u201che is here to make sure nothing happens to us\u201d. In a way, this is now repeating itself in the trial \u2013 the officers from Jena show themselves on the one hand attempting to deny any responsibility for the NSU arising out of the \u201ccomradeship Jena\u201d they had supposedly been watching. On the other hand, there seems to have been (and to still be) no interest in combating the Nazis and their political activities.<\/p>\n
The court then planned to continue the questioning of expert witness Prof. Sa\u00df. Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019s assigned counsel first tried to get Sa\u00df to hand over all his notes of the trial days he had visited. As Sa\u00df had not brought these notes (some 700 pages) with him to Munich, they stated that they had no further questions at the moment. The presiding judge announced that he will ask further questions tomorrow. The defense protested, asking that their questioning continue without interruptions once Sa\u00df had brought his notes. This issue will continue to be discussed tomorrow.<\/p>\n
Further questions were then asked of expert witness Prof. Leygraf, who tried his best to make the Wohlleben defense understand why he continues to see significant reasons for trying accused Schultze as a minor.<\/p>\n
At the end of the trial day, counsel Klemke, on behalf of the Wohlleben defense, brought a motion for an expert opinion by a demographer which aims to show that \u201cthe German Volk in its current identity will, in 2050, be a minority vis-\u00e0-vis non-Germans\u201d. A large group of victims counsel left the courtroom in protest over this motion, which shows the Wohlleben defense propagating the ideology of Wohlleben and the German Nazi scene. We are documenting a press release by several victims\u2019 counsel concerning this motion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The political criminal police in Jena: \u201che is here to makes sure nothing happens to us.\u201d And: racist motion by the Wohlleben defense The trial day began with the testimony of another police officer from Jena, asked to testify on accused Wohlleben\u2019s ideology as well as activities by Wohlleben and the Nazi-\u201ccomradeship Jena\u201d concerning \u201cforeigners\u201d. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1340"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1341,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340\/revisions\/1341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}