Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131, bas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcnden beri kesin oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi haberi verdi: Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Grasel yar\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe ad\u0131na, su\u00e7lamalarla ilgili bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurmu\u015ftu. Yarg\u0131tay ba\u015fkan\u0131 bunu 31.8.2015’te heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131na bildirmi\u015fti ve o zamandan bu yana bu tarihle ilgili \u00e7ok say\u0131da telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fti. Ama heyet ba\u015flan\u0131 yine de di\u011fer dava kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 konu hakk\u0131nda bilgilendirmeyi bug\u00fcne dek gerek g\u00f6rmedi.<\/p>\n
Bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131n\u0131n sormas\u0131 \u00fczeirne Grasel, mahkemenin sorular\u0131n\u0131n cevaplanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ama m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131nkinin cevaplanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
Eski avukat \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fc Heer, Stahl ve Sturm yeniden bir dilek\u00e7e vererek g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesini istediler ve buna gerek\u00e7e olarak b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n Grasel’in duyurular\u0131n\u0131 kendileriyle payla\u015fmamas\u0131n\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece mahkemenin kendisinin \u201etelafisi imkans\u0131z derecede sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir g\u00fcven ili\u015fkisi\u201cnden yola \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdiler.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 ise t\u00fcm hakimlerin tarafl\u0131l\u0131k gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmeleri i\u00e7in bir dfilek\u00e7e daha vereceklerini duyurdu. Dilek\u00e7e di\u011fer dava kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n bilgilendirilmemi\u015f olmalar\u0131yla gerek\u00e7elendirilecekti. Red dilek\u00e7esinin haz\u0131rlanabilmesi i\u00e7in duru\u015fmaya ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn erken saatlerine kadar ara verildi.<\/p>\n
Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n tutumu m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tabii ki ele\u015ftiriye tabi. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 aylardan bu yana biliyorsa, bunu di\u011fer dava kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131na da haber vermesi gerekirdi. Bu \u015fekilde m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar da Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi g\u00fcn duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmayacaklar\u0131na karar verme imkan\u0131na sahip olabilirlerdi.
\nEski avukatlar\u0131n bu nedenle g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesini talep etmeleri ise yine konunun \u00f6z\u00fcnden uzak: Zsch\u00e4pe’ye s\u00fcrekli susmas\u0131 tavsiyesinde bulunan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn, kendilerini bu yeni stratejiden uzakta tutmak istediklerini herkese duyurma \u00e7abas\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir durum. Ancak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n problemlerinin k\u00f6keni -yine- sadece m\u00fcvekkillerinin kendisi. Zsch\u00e4pe avukatlar\u0131 -mahkemenin atad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk avukat \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc, d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc adam Grasel’i ve son d\u00f6nemde savunmas\u0131na ortak olan Ralf Wohlleben’in avukatlar\u0131n\u0131 da- birbirine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n
Heer, Stahl ve Sturm dilek\u00e7elerinde \u201cZsc\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bir kurum olarak\u201d \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde etkisiz oldu\u011fundan \u015fikayet ediyorlar. Ancak savunma vekilllerinin bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u015fu meselenin a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekiyor: Sturm, Stahl ve Heer’in dilek\u00e7esi serbest savunma hakk\u0131na zarar verecek niteli\u011fe sahip. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n sorunu tam da m\u00fcvekkillerinin ileti\u015fime mani olmas\u0131nda yat\u0131yor. Savunma kurumunun iyili\u011fini isteyen birinin bu problemi savunma i\u00e7erisinde \u00e7\u00f6zmesi, bunun gerekti\u011finde m\u00fcvekkile de\u011fi\u015fen savunma stratejisiyle \u015fu an i\u00e7in savunma yapmaya devam edilemeyece\u011fini belirterek yapmas\u0131 gerekir. Heer, Stahl ve Sturm ise bunun yerine bir kez daha mahkemeye ba\u015fvurarak savunman\u0131n sorunlar\u0131na \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn mahkemeden gelmesini bekliyorlar. Bu durumsa mahkemenin savunman\u0131n i\u00e7 iili\u015fkilerine kar\u015f\u0131mas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmekten ba\u015fka bir \u015fey de\u011fil ki bu ili\u015fkilerin d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan gelen m\u00fcdahalelerden savunma i\u00e7erisinde anla\u015fmazl\u0131klar olsa bile , hatta tam da b\u00f6ylesi anla\u015fmazl\u0131klar oldu\u011funda mutlaka korunmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Bunlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra mahkemenin yaz tatilinden bu yana duru\u015fmalar\u0131 neden bu kadar yava\u015f y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de \u015fimdi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Belli ki Zsch\u00e4pe, Grasel ve Borchert’in a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamas\u0131n\u0131 bekliyorlar.<\/p>\n
Esas duru\u015fman\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131n\u0131 ayr\u0131ca payla\u015faca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00f6tzl, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 resmen duyurdu. \u2013 Eski avukatlar g\u00f6revlerinin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden dilek\u00e7e verdiler. Wohlleben tarafl\u0131l\u0131k gereke\u00e7esiyle hakimin reddi talebinde bulunacak. Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131, bas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcnden beri kesin oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi haberi verdi: Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Grasel yar\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe ad\u0131na, su\u00e7lamalarla ilgili bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurmu\u015ftu. Yarg\u0131tay ba\u015fkan\u0131 bunu 31.8.2015’te heyet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1020"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1020\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1021,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1020\/revisions\/1021"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}