Davan\u0131n t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131 kendilerini Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcn okunacak olmas\u0131na haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015fken, ifade bir kez daha ertelendi, bu sefer de yar\u0131na.<\/p>\n
Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kendi se\u00e7ti\u011fi avukat Borchert, d\u00fcn m\u00fcvekkilinin durumunun iyi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, h\u00fccresinin arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir sinir krizi ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini, ifadenin \u00e7ar\u015fambaya ertelenece\u011fini ve kendisinin sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc mahkemeye gelmeyece\u011fini duyurmu\u015ftu. Zsch\u00e4pe bug\u00fcn heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n sormas\u0131 \u00fczerine iyi oldu\u011funu bildirdi. Ama ifadesi avukat Grasel’in dedi\u011fine g\u00f6re ancak yar\u0131n okunacak. Grael mahkemenin sorular\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde iletebilece\u011fini, cevaplar\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak verilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Ayr\u0131ca Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n okunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ya\u015fayaca\u011f\u0131 stresin \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck olmas\u0131 nedeniyle duru\u015fman\u0131n pe\u015fembe g\u00fcn\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesini teklif etti.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme duru\u015fman\u0131n y\u00f6netimini Zsch\u00e4pe’ye vermi\u015f gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor. Mahkemenin Zsch\u00e4pe’nin suskunlu\u011funa son vermek i\u00e7in her \u015feyi yapmas\u0131 ve kabullenmesi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir durum. Ancak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin olas\u0131 bir sorgunun ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 da dikte ettirmesi kabul edilemez. Yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak teslim edilen sorularla uygun bir sorgu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilemez. \u00d6zellikle de bir sorgu, soru ve cevaplar\u0131n yeni sorulara yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileti\u015fimsel bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 oldu\u011fundan. Bir soru listesi sorgulaman\u0131n yerini tutamaz. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan mahkeme san\u0131\u011fa a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n okunmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan bir karar vermesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmeli: Anlatacak ba\u015fka \u015feyleri varsa, sorulara kendi cevap vermeli ve orada sorgulanmal\u0131. Ya da susmaya devam etmeli. Yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 cevaplar\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin yeni avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n da m\u00fcvekkillerinin ifadeleri \u00fczerinde kontrol sahibi olmak istedikleri belli.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil avukat Reinecke blogunda Zsch\u00e4pe’nin beklenen a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve Wohlleben’in ifadesiyle ilgili kimi temel d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerini dile getirdi. Almanca metin i\u00e7in bkz: http:\/\/www.blog-rechtsanwael.de\/angekuendigte-aussagen-und-was-macht-gerlach\/<\/a><\/p>\n Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 m\u00fcvekkillerinin de ifade verece\u011fini ama bunun bu hafta ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fini belirtti. Wohlleben’in \u00fc\u00e7 avukat\u0131 bununla ilgili olarak k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klama Wohlleben’in \u201eideallerine ve politik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine sad\u0131k oldu\u011fu ve gelecekte de sad\u0131k olaca\u011f\u0131\u201c notuyla sonlan\u0131yordu. NSU watch’un da belirtti\u011fi gibi bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (\u201eGer\u00e7e\u011fe Ge\u00e7it\u201c, ayn\u0131 zamanda Franz von Papen’in kitab\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131), hem tarihi hem de Neo-Nasyonal Sosyalistlerin metinlerinde pek \u00e7ok \u00f6rne\u011fi var (Almanca metin i\u00e7in bkz: http:\/\/www.nsu-watch.info\/2015\/12\/der-wahrheit-ein-kreisverkehr\/)<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mahkeme bug\u00fcn B\u00f6hnhardt, Mundlos ve Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tren kartlar\u0131yla ilgili olarak bir tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulad\u0131. B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n kart\u0131 Andr\u00e9 Eminger ad\u0131nayd\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe’ninki Susan Eminger ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Kart masraflar\u0131 2010\/2011 y\u0131llar\u0131nda Eminger’in hesab\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n Bunun ard\u0131ndan mahkeme Nazi fanzini \u201eWhite Supremacy\u201cden \u201eUwe Unwohl\u201c ve \u201eUwe UmerZOGen\u201c isimleri alt\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f iki makaleyi okudu. Muhbirlerin verdi\u011fi bilgilere g\u00f6re bunlar Uwe Mundlos’un takma isimleriydi. Ard\u0131ndan Tarif kod adl\u0131 muhbirle ilgili kimi belgeler okundu. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulamak i\u00e7in vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu dilek\u00e7eyle ilgili olarak mahkeme hala karar vermedi (bkz. 18.03.2014 <\/a>ve 20.10.2015<\/a> tarihli bloglar).<\/p>\n Yar\u0131nki duru\u015fmada Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmas\u0131 -en \u00e7ok da bas\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan- bekleniyor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Zsch\u00e4pe’nin ifadesi bir kez daha ertelendi, bu sefer yar\u0131na Davan\u0131n t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131 kendilerini Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcn okunacak olmas\u0131na haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015fken, ifade bir kez daha ertelendi, bu sefer de yar\u0131na. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kendi se\u00e7ti\u011fi avukat Borchert, d\u00fcn m\u00fcvekkilinin durumunun iyi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, h\u00fccresinin arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir sinir krizi ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini, ifadenin \u00e7ar\u015fambaya ertelenece\u011fini ve kendisinin sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc mahkemeye gelmeyece\u011fini […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1046"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1047,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1046\/revisions\/1047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}