San\u0131k Ralf Wohlleben, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin davaya kar\u015f\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fen tutumu \u00fczerine yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurmu\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 biraz \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde bug\u00fcn okudu. Wohlleben davan\u0131n t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131n\u0131n sorular\u0131n\u0131 cevaplayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ama bug\u00fcn sadece \u015fahs\u0131na dair sorular\u0131 cevaplayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Daha haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden olaylarla ilgili sorulara ancak Ocak ay\u0131nda cevap verebilecekti.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben kendisine y\u00f6nelik su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 reddetti. Arkada\u015flar\u0131na ka\u00e7malar\u0131nda yard\u0131m etmi\u015fti, ama b\u00f6ylesi su\u00e7lar i\u015fleyeceklerine asla ihtimal vermemi\u015fti. Carsten Schultze’nin nerede silah aramas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi konusunda tavsiyede de bulunmu\u015ftu, ama Uwe B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n bu silaha sadece bir tutukluluk durumunda kendini \u00f6ldrmek amac\u0131yla sahip olmak istedi\u011fini varsaym\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Politik ya\u015fam\u0131nda da \u00f6zel ya\u015fam\u0131nda da \u015fiddet kullan\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131yd\u0131, \u00f6zellikle de yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 \u015fiddete kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yordu. Wohlleben bu \u015fekilde Andr\u00e9 Kapke’nin onun ki\u015fili\u011fini tarif ederken kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201ebar\u0131\u015f g\u00fcvercini\u201c tabirini benimsedi ve kendisini kurban olarak g\u00f6sterdi. Kendisinin arzu etti\u011fi ulusalc\u0131 y\u00f6nelimin yerine k\u00fcreselle\u015fme, g\u00f6\u00e7 ve kapitalizmi getiren Almanya’n\u0131n yeniden birle\u015fmesinin kurban\u0131. \u201eUlusalc\u0131lara\u201c keyfi bir \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131 koyan polisin kurban\u0131. Kendisine ve yolda\u015flar\u0131na s\u00fcrekli sald\u0131ran antifa\u015fitlerin kurban\u0131. Sadece kendilerinin de\u011fil onun da aleyhine konu\u015fan di\u011fer san\u0131klar Gerlach ve Schultze’nin kurban\u0131.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben’in Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’la defalarca Chemnitz’de ve Tino Brandt’\u0131n muhbir oldu\u011funun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan (May\u0131s 2001’de) bir kez de Zwickau’da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi \u00f6nemliydi. Chemnitz’deki bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn ka\u00e7malar\u0131yla ilgili detaylar\u0131 bilen bir \u201edazlak\u201c da oradayd\u0131. Tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir adam telefonda talimatlar\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Bu bilgilerle \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir i\u015flevi oldu\u011funu do\u011frulad\u0131. Bu, Brandt’\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcy\u00fc tehlikeye at\u0131p atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusu i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben’in a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda dikkat \u00e7ekici olan Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na benzer bir \u015fekilde, b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n iddia edilen intihar plan\u0131na dayanmas\u0131yd\u0131. Ancka Zsch\u00e4pe kimi iddialara y\u00f6nelik abs\u00fcrd a\u00e7\u0131klamalar bulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken Wohlleben sadece inkar etmekle yetindi. Zsch\u00e4pe politik duru\u015funu saklamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken Wohlleben mahkemede yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 politik propaganda amac\u0131yla kulland\u0131. Kendisinin de organizat\u00f6rleri aras\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u201eHalklar\u0131n Festivali\u201c i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131y\u0131 detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde okudu, bir Neonazi propaganda videosu izletti, \u201eetnik \u00e7o\u011fulcuk\u201c teorilerinden bahsetti.<\/p>\n
\u0130ki a\u00e7\u0131klamada ortak olan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015fahsi su\u00e7u reddetmeleriydi. Ba\u015fka bir ortakl\u0131k da kendi i\u00e7lerinde tamamen tutars\u0131z olmalar\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca \u015fu ana kadarki delillere ters d\u00fc\u015fmeleriydi. Zsch\u00e4pe m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n okunaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn mahkeme salonuna gelmelerini \u00f6nlemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Wohlleben de bunu denedi ve \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 ve \u00f6nceden haber verilmeyen a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla ba\u015fard\u0131. Ancak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki izleyici b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yerlerini alm\u0131\u015f olan bir dizi Neonazi destek\u00e7inin a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131ndan haberleri vard\u0131.<\/p>\n
Bu \u00f6zellkle deWohlleben kendisini \u015fiddetten hep nefret etmi\u015f ve \u201eyolda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n\u201c \u00e7evresindeki \u201eideolojik e\u011fitimleri\u201c reddetmi\u015f olan bir \u201ebar\u0131\u015f mele\u011fi\u201c olarak g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda belli oldu. Jena Eyalet Meclisi milletvekili Katharina K\u00f6nig’in, a\u00e7\u0131klamadaki \u00f6nemli noktalar\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamak i\u00e7in sadece 4 kez 140 karaktere<\/a> ihtiyac\u0131 oldu: \u201e3. Reich’\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131\u201c konulu sunum nas\u0131ld\u0131?\u201c diye sorarak tam da Wohlleben’in \u015fiddetten uzak durmaya y\u00f6nelik \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131na tan\u0131k olarak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmak istedi\u011fi Nazi’nin kendisinin solcu bir gen\u00e7lik kamp\u0131na ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sald\u0131r\u0131dan sonra \u0131slahevine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n \u201eBlood and Honour\u201c a\u011f\u0131ndan k\u00f6t\u00fc \u015f\u00f6hretli gruplar\u0131n sahhne ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Nasyonal Sosyalizmi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a y\u00fccelten Avrupa partilerinin temsilcilerinin Avrupa SS-g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc birliklerininkini and\u0131ran bir pankart \u00f6n\u00fcnde sahneye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131 \u201eHalklar\u0131n Festivali\u201cne at\u0131fta bulunmas\u0131, mahkemeyi Wohlleben’in \u201ebar\u0131\u015fa yatk\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201c nedeniyle aklanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ikna edemeyecekti.<\/p>\n San\u0131klar Schultze ve Gerlach’\u0131n Wohlleben’i a\u011f\u0131r zan alt\u0131nda b\u0131rakan ve daha \u00f6nce polise vermi\u015f olup mahkemede tekrarlad\u0131klar\u0131 ifadelerini sadece inkarda bulunarak \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. Hele ki bu kadar ge\u00e7 yap\u0131lan ve halihaz\u0131rda sunulmu\u015f olan delillere g\u00f6re haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n sadece d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck bir delil de\u011feri ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcrse…<\/p>\n Ayr\u0131ca Wohlleben’e y\u00f6neltilen daha ilk soruda, t\u00fcm sorular\u0131 yan\u0131tlayaca\u011f\u0131na dair yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z\u00fcnde durmayaca\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131: Kendisine \u015fifreli bir harddiskin \u015fifresi soruldu\u011funda bunu vermeyi reddederek i\u00e7erisindeki belgelerin \u015fifresiz harddisktekiyle ayn\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Bu akla yatmayan bir a\u00e7\u0131klama. Bu belgeler zaten bilinen belgelerle ayn\u0131ysa, \u015fifreyi s\u00f6ylemek sorun olmazd\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ben! Bir! Kurban\u0131m! San\u0131k Wohlleben su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funu iddia ediyor San\u0131k Ralf Wohlleben, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin davaya kar\u015f\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fen tutumu \u00fczerine yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurmu\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 biraz \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde bug\u00fcn okudu. Wohlleben davan\u0131n t\u00fcm taraflar\u0131n\u0131n sorular\u0131n\u0131 cevaplayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ama bug\u00fcn sadece \u015fahs\u0131na dair sorular\u0131 cevaplayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Daha haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden olaylarla ilgili sorulara ancak Ocak ay\u0131nda cevap verebilecekti. Wohlleben kendisine […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1054,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053\/revisions\/1054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}