16.12.2015<\/a> tarihli blog) Ancak heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakim G\u00f6tzl’\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sorguya 14:30’a do\u011fru ara verilmesi gerekti, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc avukat Klemke m\u00fcvekkilinin ba\u015f ve s\u0131rt a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve duru\u015fmaya daha fazla konsantre olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Wohlleben’in cinayet silah\u0131n\u0131n tedarik edilmesiyle ilgili anlatt\u0131klar\u0131yla kendi ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 giderek daha fazla derde sokmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Klemke’nin m\u00fcdahalesi durumu kurtarmaya yetmedi.<\/p>\nAma ba\u015fa d\u00f6nersek: Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 sorgusunda Wohlleben’in 16.12.2016’te okudu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndaki belirsizliklere odakland\u0131. Sabah saatlerinde bu nedenle ilk olarak Wohlleben’in politik geli\u015fimi, \u201eJena Silah Arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201c, \u201eTh\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma\u201c vb. konular konu\u015fuldu. Wohlleben \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 \u015fekilde propagandac\u0131 s\u00f6ylemlerde bulunmad\u0131 ve \u00e7e\u015fitli Neonazi gruplar\u0131n\u0131n faaliyetlerini \u00f6nemsiz ve hatta kesinlikle \u015fiddetten uzak olarak g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7abalad\u0131. Ama yine de bir iki yerde i\u00e7indeki Nazi propagandac\u0131 d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131, \u00f6rne\u011fin kendisine \u201eJena Ulusal Direni\u015fi\u201c ve ard\u0131ndan kurulan \u201eJena Silah Arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201cn\u0131n faaliyetleri sorulunca onlar\u0131n kendi a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 okudu\u011funda ve Dresden’deki bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131yla ilgili olarak tarihi bilgilerle \u00e7eli\u015fen ezler \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde.<\/p>\n
Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fcne do\u011fru yava\u015f yava\u015f konunun \u00f6z\u00fcne indi. Yani Wohlleben’in san\u0131k sandalyesinde oturmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni olan Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt i\u00e7in tedarik etti\u011fi cinayet silah\u0131na. Ba\u015flarda silah sa\u011flamak istemedi\u011fini ve \u201c\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fcy\u00fc\u201d sadece oyalamak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylese de, su\u00e7lamalara dair giderek daha fazla objektif itirafta bulundu: B\u00f6hnhardt ona Nazi d\u00fckkan\u0131 Madley’e silah hakk\u0131nda dan\u0131\u015fabilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti. Bunu san\u0131k Schultze’ye s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olabilirdi, Schultze’ye bu konuda ona dan\u0131\u015fabilece\u011fini de s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olabilirdi. Ve evet, silaha Schultze ile birlikte bakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, susturucuyu da silaha takm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. O esnada bir \u015fey d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmemi\u015f, bunu sadece bir \u201cnumara\u201d olarak, basit bir ek par\u00e7a olarak g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben b\u00f6ylelikle Schultze’nin anlatt\u0131klar\u0131na \u00e7ok benzeyen objektif bir olay ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 sunmu\u015f oldu. Schultze de Wohlleben’in kendisini Madley’nin sahibine yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, silah\u0131 oradan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ard\u0131ndan Wohlleben’e silah\u0131 getirmi\u015f o da onu \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcye yollam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben silahla ne yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131an dair herhangi bir bilgisi oldu\u011funu inkar etmeye devam etti. B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n silahla kendisini vuraca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f\u00fc, bu nedenle Schultze veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131yla konu hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir arkada\u015f\u0131n intihar planlar\u0131 ho\u015f bir konu de\u011fildi. \u015eimdi 251. duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnde, yani dellillerin b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmas\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil. Hele ki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 basit inkarlarla s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 ve neden duru\u015fman\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ya da hatta hemen tut\u0131ulanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda savunma stratejisi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlaml\u0131 bir neden g\u00f6sterememesi onu inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131ktan iyice uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yor. B\u00f6ylesi bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n ana i\u00e7eri\u011fi, yani B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n kendini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek istemesi, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin sadece iki duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6ncesinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu ifadeyi ciddiye almak \u00e7ok zorla\u015f\u0131yor. Wohlleben’in savunma stratejisi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a mahkemeyi aptal yerine koymak.<\/p>\n
Sorguya yar\u0131n mahkemenin ve di\u011fer davac\u0131lar\u0131n sorular\u0131yla devam edilecek. Wohlleben ve avukatlar\u0131 bug\u00fcnk\u00fc ifadeyi \u201egeri almaya\u201c \u00e7al\u0131\u015facaklar m\u0131 g\u00f6rece\u011fiz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Wohlleben’in kendini temize \u00e7\u0131karma \u00e7abalar\u0131 k\u0131smi bir itirafa yol a\u00e7t\u0131 Bug\u00fcn san\u0131k Wohlleben mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan sorguland\u0131. Wohlleben 16.12.2015’te kapsaml\u0131 \u015fekilde haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f bir a\u00e7\u0131klama okumu\u015f ve sorulara cevap verece\u011fini duyurmu\u015ftu (bkz. 16.12.2015 tarihli blog) Ancak heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakim G\u00f6tzl’\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sorguya 14:30’a do\u011fru ara verilmesi gerekti, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc avukat Klemke m\u00fcvekkilinin ba\u015f ve s\u0131rt a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1062"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1063,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions\/1063"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}