Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fma Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Grasel’in haftasonu heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00f6tzl’e kar\u015f\u0131 hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu haberiyle ba\u015flad\u0131. G\u00f6tzl bunun \u00f6ncesinde Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Sturm’un g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi bir ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7eyi reddetmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6revden al\u0131nmaya y\u00f6nelik farkl\u0131 dilek\u00e7elerin gerek\u00e7eleri dava s\u00fcrecinde \u00f6z\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 kald\u0131klar\u0131ndan, bunlara dair \u00e7ok fazla bir \u015fey s\u00f6ylemeye gerek yok: Avukatlar\u0131n g\u00f6revden al\u0131nmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik dilek\u00e7elerin reddi her \u015feyden \u00f6nce Heer, Stahl ve Sturm’un savunmaya haz\u0131r ve muktedir olmlar\u0131na ve savunma i\u00e7erisindeki ileti\u015fimin bozulmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ileti\u015fimi reddetmesinden kaynaklanmas\u0131na dayan\u0131yor. Bu durum hukuksal olarak do\u011fru oldu\u011fundan heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle reddine gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturmuyor, bu nedenle bu hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esi de ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011framaya mahkum.<\/p>\n
Hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili karar en ge\u00e7 per\u015fembe g\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fmadan \u00f6nce verilmeli. Yar\u0131nki duru\u015fma \u2013bir kez daha- iptal oldu.<\/p>\n
Ancak mahkeme bug\u00fcn duru\u015fmaya devam etti. \u00d6nce san\u0131klar Gerlach, Wohlleben, Eminger ve Schultze ile ilgili olarak Anayasay\u0131 Koruma’dan farkl\u0131 bilgiler okundu. Ard\u0131ndan heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’ye \u00e7e\u015fitli sorular sordu. \u00d6zellikle \u015fu ana kadar verdi\u011fi bilgilerle ilgili soru soruldu, ama ayr\u0131ca Andr\u00e9 Eminger ve kar\u0131s\u0131 Susann’\u0131n NSU’nun i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lardan ne derecede haberlerinin oldu\u011fu da soruldu. Avukat Grasel, cevaplar\u0131n yine yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak haz\u0131rlan\u0131p okunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu. Bu Schultze’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7en seferden hala cevaplanmayan sorular\u0131 i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erliydi. Bu sorular \u201eg\u00f6z\u00fcnden ka\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u201c ama \u201eonlar\u0131 bir nefeste cevaplayaca\u011f\u0131m(!)\u201c dedi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131ndan hakimin reddi talebi ve san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’ye sorular Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fma Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Grasel’in haftasonu heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00f6tzl’e kar\u015f\u0131 hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu haberiyle ba\u015flad\u0131. G\u00f6tzl bunun \u00f6ncesinde Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Sturm’un g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi bir ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7eyi reddetmi\u015fti. G\u00f6revden al\u0131nmaya y\u00f6nelik farkl\u0131 dilek\u00e7elerin gerek\u00e7eleri dava s\u00fcrecinde \u00f6z\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1075"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1076,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1075\/revisions\/1076"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}