Mahkeme bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fmaya, Chemnitz’deki bir Sparkasse’ye 2006 y\u0131l\u0131 Ekim ay\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen soygunla ilgili tan\u0131kl\u0131klarla ba\u015flad\u0131. Bu soygun di\u011ferlerinin aksine sadece bir ki\u015fi, san\u0131k Uwe B\u00f6hnhardt taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015fti. B\u00f6hnhardt di\u011fer\u00a0soygunlarda oldu\u011fu gibi \u00e7ok vah\u015fi davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmu\u015f, bir masa\u00a0vantilat\u00f6r\u00fcyle orada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan birine ve kendisini engellemek isteyen bir\u00a0stajyerin karn\u0131na ate\u015f etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
\u0130lk tan\u0131k o zamanlar staj yapmakta olan bu ki\u015fiydi ve olaylar\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve kendisi \u00fczerindeki etkilerini \u00e7ok nesnel bie \u015fekilde anlatt\u0131: Uzun bir s\u00fcre olay\u0131n bedensel ve ruhsal etkisi alt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f ve bu nedenle Sparkasse’deki e\u011fitimini tamamlayamam\u0131\u015f ve uzun bir s\u00fcre hastal\u0131k izni ald\u0131ktan sonra ba\u015fka bir alanda yeni bir meslek e\u011fitimine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ama yeni mesle\u011finde de u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiziksel hasarlar nedeniyle sadece k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabiliyordu. <\/p>\n
O zamanlar tesad\u00fcfen olay yerinde olan ve ilk yard\u0131mda bulunan bir doktor da bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n karn\u0131na yedi\u011fi darbenin yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r yaralanmalar\u0131 anlatt\u0131. Ba\u015fka bir Sparkasse \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 ise meslekta\u015f\u0131n\u0131n olaylar\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile ilgili verdi\u011fi bilgileri do\u011frulad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Bu Sparkasse \u015fubesinin ba\u015fka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 yar\u0131n ifade vermek \u00fczere \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131lar. \u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki haftalarda mahkeme yeniden ba\u015fka soygunlarla ilgilenecek.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme bug\u00fcn m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ba\u015fka delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini reddetti. Bunlar aras\u0131nda K\u00f6ln Probsteigasse’de 2000\/2001’de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddeli sald\u0131r\u0131 ve K\u00f6lnl\u00fc Neonazi ve muhbir Johann H.’nin, Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi’nin bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere robot bir resimle benzerli\u011fiyle ilgili (s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f) soru\u015fturmalarla ilgili dilek\u00e7eler vard\u0131. Bu konuyla ilgili verilecek kararda bu sorular\u0131n \u00f6nemsiz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc. Ayn\u0131s\u0131, NSU’nun a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131sa s\u00fcre ard\u0131ndan Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan imha edilen ve \u00e7e\u015fitli muhbirlerle ilgili yeniden eski haline getirilmi\u015f dosyalar\u0131n ve muhbir Michael See (\u201eTarif\u201c) ile ilgili ba\u015fka delillerin davada kaynak olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi i\u00e7in verilen dilek\u00e7eler i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erliydi.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme b\u00f6ylelikle NSU taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n iddianamenin dar kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131yla (art\u0131k) ilgilenmedi\u011fini bir kez daha g\u00f6stermi\u015f oldu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NSU’nun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi banka soygunlar\u0131yla ilgili ba\u015fka tan\u0131kl\u0131klar Mahkeme bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fmaya, Chemnitz’deki bir Sparkasse’ye 2006 y\u0131l\u0131 Ekim ay\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen soygunla ilgili tan\u0131kl\u0131klarla ba\u015flad\u0131. Bu soygun di\u011ferlerinin aksine sadece bir ki\u015fi, san\u0131k Uwe B\u00f6hnhardt taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015fti. B\u00f6hnhardt di\u011fer\u00a0soygunlarda oldu\u011fu gibi \u00e7ok vah\u015fi davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmu\u015f, bir masa\u00a0vantilat\u00f6r\u00fcyle orada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan birine ve kendisini engellemek isteyen bir\u00a0stajyerin karn\u0131na ate\u015f etmi\u015fti. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1084"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1084\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1090,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1084\/revisions\/1090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}