Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc ilk olarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7elerin reddedildi\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n duyurulmas\u0131yla ba\u015flad\u0131. Bunun ard\u0131ndan Federal Kriminal Dairesi’nden bir kad\u0131n komiser Eisenach’daki sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos’un \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik yay\u0131nlanan radyo haberlerine dair ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak bir kez daha sorguland\u0131.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme k\u0131sa duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn devam\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n; B\u00f6hnhardt, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos’un kriminal tan\u0131d\u0131k \u00e7evreleriyle ve \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn Chemnitz’de kald\u0131klar\u0131 s\u0131rada \u015fehirde olduklar\u0131na, ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f olduklar\u0131 ve planlad\u0131klar\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131lara ve destek\u00e7ileri ile ilgili raporlar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ra\u011fmen neden tutuklanmam\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 sorusuyla ilgili delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini reddederek ge\u00e7irdi.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme kararlarda kan\u0131t olarak g\u00f6sterilen olaylardan neden \u201cilgili yetkililerin aranan ki\u015filerin soru\u015fturup tutuklanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilmelerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu\u201d sonucunun \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sayfalarca a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Heyetin Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirledi\u011fi \u00e7izgiye uydu\u011fu ve ayd\u0131nlatma \u00e7abalar\u0131na son verdi\u011fi \u201cHeyet bu nedenle resmi bir sorumluluk tespi edememi\u015ftir.\u201d tespitiyle nihai olarak belli oldu.<\/p>\n
Bunlar tabii ki \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil. Buna ra-men kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elendirilmesine y\u00f6nelik g\u00f6steri\u011fi k\u0131smen \u00e7ok yo\u011fun \u00e7abalar, heyetin hipotezini gerek\u00e7elendirmek i\u00e7in kendisini \u00e7ok zorlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. B\u00f6ylece Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi’nden gelen bask\u0131 \u00fczerine Chemnitz’deki arama tedbirlerinin ihmal edilmesinin daha sonra i\u015flenen su\u00e7lara dair resmi bir sorumluluk anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi \u015f\u00f6yle gerek\u00e7elendirildi: \u201cAranan ki\u015filerin oturdu\u011fu ev soru\u015fturulabilece\u011fi halde bir tutuklaman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin mecburi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u201caranan ki\u015filerin tedbirlerinin, \u00f6rne\u011fin bir ka\u00e7\u0131\u015f rotas\u0131 olu\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131n, \u2026 bir tutuklaman\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesni engelleyebilece\u011fi\u201d g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmal\u0131yd\u0131. Bu mant\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6re resmi yetkililer su\u00e7a aktif olarak i\u015ftirak etmedikleri s\u00fcrece resmi bir m\u00fc\u015fterek kusur asla s\u00f6z konusu olamaz.<\/p>\n
Beate Zsch\u00e4pe Per\u015fembe g\u00fcn\u00fc yine sorular\u0131 cevaplatmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Mahkeme heyetinin muhbirlerin olaylarla ilgisini ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmamak i\u00e7in yo\u011fun \u00e7abas\u0131 Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc ilk olarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7elerin reddedildi\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n duyurulmas\u0131yla ba\u015flad\u0131. Bunun ard\u0131ndan Federal Kriminal Dairesi’nden bir kad\u0131n komiser Eisenach’daki sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos’un \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik yay\u0131nlanan radyo haberlerine dair ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak bir kez daha sorguland\u0131. Mahkeme k\u0131sa duru\u015fma […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1140,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions\/1140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}