Mahkeme bug\u00fcn yeniden, Carsten Schultze’nin NSU’nun 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda kendini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131ndan sonra vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadelerle ilgilendi.<\/p>\n
\u00d6nce, olay zaman\u0131nda 19-20 ya\u015flar\u0131nda olan Schulze’ye o zaman gen\u00e7lik ceza hukukunun uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bilirki\u015fi Prof. Leygraf yine rapor verdi. Bir kez daha Schulze’nin kendisine vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgileri ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde aktard\u0131. Schultze’nin Nazi camias\u0131ndaki faaliyetlerine y\u00f6nelik anlatt\u0131klar\u0131ndan edindi\u011fi izlenim m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lardan \u00e7o\u011funun alg\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyordu: Schultze olanlar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc bir macera olarak anlat\u0131p i\u00e7erikleri bir kenara b\u0131rak\u0131yordu: \u201cAnlatt\u0131klar\u0131 izci romantizminden daha fazla gibiydi.\u201d<\/p>\n
Leygraf savunman\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine yeniden \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve savunma taraf\u0131ndan yo\u011fun \u015fekilde sorguland\u0131. Yine Schultze’nin silah tedari\u011fine dair verdi\u011fi bilgilerden \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131racak bir bilgi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. Ama avukat Klemke Nazi camias\u0131n\u0131n genel s\u00f6zc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00fcstlenmeye devam ederek bilirki\u015finin camiada \u201cyabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 sloganlar\u201d at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tezinden \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ya da bilirki\u015finin Schultze’nin o zamanlar dinledi\u011fi Radikahl isimli m\u00fczik grubunu neden a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 sa\u011fc\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fine \u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131. Radikahl’\u0131n en bilinen \u015fark\u0131 s\u00f6z\u00fc \u015f\u00f6yle: \u201cHitler’e Nobel \u00d6d\u00fcl\u00fc’n\u00fc verin, gamal\u0131 ha\u00e7l\u0131 k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 bayra\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6\u011fe \u00e7ekin.\u201d<\/p>\n
Son olarak Carsten Schultze’yi sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015fka bir Federal Kriminal Dairesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 sorguland\u0131. Onun sorgusu ve hakimin eski sorgu tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinden uzun uzun ge\u00e7mesi de beklenmedik bir \u015fey ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmad\u0131. Gelmesi beklenen tek tan\u0131k mazeretli oldu\u011fundan 14.6.2016, yani \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015fecek olan duru\u015fma iptal edildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Konu yine Carsten Schultze’nin eskiden vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadeler Mahkeme bug\u00fcn yeniden, Carsten Schultze’nin NSU’nun 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda kendini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131ndan sonra vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadelerle ilgilendi. \u00d6nce, olay zaman\u0131nda 19-20 ya\u015flar\u0131nda olan Schulze’ye o zaman gen\u00e7lik ceza hukukunun uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bilirki\u015fi Prof. Leygraf yine rapor verdi. Bir kez daha Schulze’nin kendisine vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgileri ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1155"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1156,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155\/revisions\/1156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}