Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Eyalet Meclisi\u2019nde NPD milletvekili olan David Petereit bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131yd\u0131 ve saat 09:30\u2019dan 20:45\u2019e kadar sorguland\u0131. Bu sorgunun \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f noktas\u0131 asl\u0131nda olduk\u00e7a netti: Petereit en az\u0131ndan 2000 ile 2004 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Nazi fanzini \u201cBeyaz Kurt\u201dun \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131nda rol oynam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu derginin 1\/2002 nolu say\u0131s\u0131nda militan \u00f6rg\u00fct Combat 18 hakk\u0131ndaki makalelerin yan\u0131s\u0131ra \u201cEihwaz\u201d takma ad\u0131yla yazm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bir \u00f6ns\u00f6z de vard\u0131. Bu \u00f6ns\u00f6zde \u201cZor zamanlarda sava\u015fmak gerekir\u201d yaz\u0131yordu. \u201cSilah arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 cezaevinde, sa\u011fc\u0131 m\u00fccadelede, sokakta desteklemek, a\u011f olu\u015fturmak gerek \u2013 d\u00f6n\u00fcm noktas\u0131 sadece m\u00fczik dinleyip parti yaparak gelmeyecek.\u201d Ve ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6rsel olarak belirgin bir \u015fekilde ve kal\u0131n harflerle: \u201cNSU\u2019ya \u00e7ok te\u015fekk\u00fcrler, meyvalar\u0131n\u0131 veriyor \ud83d\ude09 Sava\u015f devam ediyor\u2026\u201d yaz\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin 09.04.2002 tarihli bir raporunda bir muhbirin raporu \u015fu \u015fekilde \u00f6zetlenmi\u015fti: \u201cNeustrelitz\u2019den \u201cBeyaz Kurt\u201d dergisine 2500 avroluk ba\u011f\u0131\u015fta bulunulmu\u015f. Bu ba\u011f\u0131\u015fla birlikte yollanan mektupta \u201cB\u00f6yle devam edin, para sizin yan\u0131n\u0131zda do\u011fru yerde!\u201dmesaj\u0131 veriliyordu.<\/p>\n
Bu raporun k\u0131sa s\u00fcre ard\u0131ndan muhbir Richter (Corelli) Petereit ile temas kurarak ona kendisinin kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir sunucu \u00fczerinde \u201cBeyaz Kurt\u201dun internet sitesi i\u00e7in bellek vermeyi teklif etmi\u015fti. Petereit bunu m\u00fcte\u015fekk\u00fcr \u015fekilde kabul etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
NSU\u2019nun kendini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, bug\u00fcn NSU-watch projesini y\u00fcr\u00fcten anti-fa\u015fist bas\u0131n ar\u015fivi apapiz, NSU\u2019ya yap\u0131lan bu te\u015fekk\u00fcr\u00fc ar\u015fivinde bulup a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bunun ard\u0131ndan Petereit aranm\u0131\u015f ve ar\u015fivinde Fr\u00fchlingsstrasse\u2019deki bilgisayarda da bulunan NSU mektubu bulunmu\u015ftu. Mektubun i\u00e7eri\u011fi militan sava\u015fa dair bir itiraft\u0131 ve Nazi \u00e7evrelerinden bu sava\u015f\u0131 desteklemeyi talep ediyordu.<\/p>\n
\u00c7ok say\u0131da delil ba\u015fka Nazi projelerinin de bu \u015fekilde para deste\u011fi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyordu. Buna g\u00f6re NSU\u2019nun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 2002 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana olduk\u00e7a b\u00fcy\u00fck say\u0131da Nazi aktivist araf\u0131ndan biliniyor olmal\u0131yd\u0131. Bu da m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n NSU\u2019nun b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda ba\u015fka gruplarla ve tekil ki\u015filerle ba\u011flant\u0131da oldu\u011funa dair tezini kuvvetle destekliyor ve Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n izole \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc tezine a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde ters d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyordu.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar raporun geldi\u011fi muhbirin, ya da en az\u0131ndan ondan sorumlu olan y\u00f6neticinin sorgulanmas\u0131 ve raporun orijinalinin dava dosyalar\u0131 aras\u0131na girmesi i\u00e7in \u00e7oktan dilek\u00e7e vermi\u015fti. Mahkeme \u015fu ana kadar sadece Mecklenburg-Vorpommern\u2019den raporun i\u00e7eri\u011fini onaylayan bir resmi belge alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k Petereit 2000 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana Beyaz Kurt\u2019un yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131, haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funu tek ba\u015f\u0131na \u00fcstlense de bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir \u015fey hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Gazeteyi tek ba\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131akrd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan NSU\u2019ya yollanan selam\u0131 kendisinin \u201ckoymu\u015f\u201d oldu\u011funu belirtti. Ama mektubu ilk kez evi arand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hi\u00e7 olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. S\u00fcrekli hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi, ama belli noktalarda \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgiler verdi. Ama bunu sadece kendisi i\u00e7in olumlu g\u00f6r\u00fcnen konularda yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n
Petereit\u2019in fanzinin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na dair anlatt\u0131klar\u0131, verdi\u011fi bilgilerin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyordu: Derginin tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 MS Word program\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ediyordu, ama grafik unsurlardan \u00e7o\u011funun bu programla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildi. Fanzinleri 1000 kopyaya kadar kendisi haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015f ve da\u011f\u0131tm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Di\u011fer faaliyetlerinin yan\u0131nda bunun \u00fcstesinden de nas\u0131l gelmi\u015f oldu\u011fuysa belirsiz. Arada bir kimi bilgileri a\u011fz\u0131ndan ka\u00e7\u0131rarak posta kutusunun birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fka ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan da kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Petereit\u2019\u0131n kendisini ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131 korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 davac\u0131lar i\u00e7in ortadayd\u0131.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin ve Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n tavr\u0131 tutarl\u0131 ama sinir bozucuydu. Do\u011fruyu s\u00f6ylemesi i\u00e7in tan\u0131\u011fa hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde bask\u0131da bulunmad\u0131lar. Bu tav\u0131r tutarl\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k en ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana izole \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc tezini ayakta tutmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. Ama bu tez 2002 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki ba\u011f\u0131\u015f kampanyas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana tan\u0131kla her t\u00fcr\u00fc y\u00fczle\u015fmeden ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131. Bunun sebebi muhtemelen verilecek karar i\u00e7in Nazi \u00e7evrelerinden tan\u0131klar\u0131n verecekleri yeni bilgiler olmadan da yeteri say\u0131da delilin bulunmas\u0131yd\u0131. Olaylar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 bu a\u00e7\u0131dan daha ziyade bir engel te\u015fkil ediyordu.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca \u201ctedbirli\u201d bir \u015fekilde Eyl\u00fcl 2017 tarihine kadarki duru\u015fma tarihlerini verdi. Bu duru\u015fmalar\u0131n hepsinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi muhtemel olmasa da bu durum davan\u0131n medyada \u00e7\u0131kan kimi haberlerin aksine son d\u00fczl\u00fc\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyor. \u00d6zellikle de mahkemenin son haftalarda davay\u0131 yar\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fck bir i\u015f olarak g\u00f6rmesi tan\u0131k sorgular\u0131n\u0131n daha birka\u00e7 ay s\u00fcrece\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Yalan ve inkar \u00e7abalar\u0131 XVI \u2013 Eyalet Meclisi \u00fcyesi Petereit, Beyaz Kurt, NSU mektubu ve 2500 avro, ama hi\u00e7birini hat\u0131rlayan yok Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Eyalet Meclisi\u2019nde NPD milletvekili olan David Petereit bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131yd\u0131 ve saat 09:30\u2019dan 20:45\u2019e kadar sorguland\u0131. Bu sorgunun \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f noktas\u0131 asl\u0131nda olduk\u00e7a netti: Petereit en az\u0131ndan 2000 ile 2004 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Nazi fanzini […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"no","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1178"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1183,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1178\/revisions\/1183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}