Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Jena’da 1990’lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir kavgan\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kendisinden daha \u00f6nce pek \u00e7ok kez bahsedilmi\u015f olan biri sorgulanacakt\u0131. Ama bu ki\u015fi mahkemeye gelmedi.<\/p>\n
Ard\u0131ndan mahkemenin ilk plan\u0131na g\u00f6re Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Borchert m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapacakt\u0131. Ama bu ger\u00e7ekle\u015femeden avukat Heer s\u00f6z al\u0131p m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe’ye 6 Temmuz’da y\u00f6neltmi\u015f olduklar\u0131 kimi sorulara itiraz eden bir yaz\u0131l\u0131 ifade okumaya ba\u015flad\u0131. Borchert’in \u0131srar etmesi \u00fczerine bir ara verildi. Ard\u0131ndan Borchert Heer’in itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 sunmas\u0131na izin vererek Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ancak mahkemenin bu itirazlar hakk\u0131nda karar\u0131n\u0131 vermesinin ard\u0131ndan okunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu. G\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde t\u00fcm anla\u015fmazl\u0131klara ra\u011fmen davay\u0131 aksatma konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f birli\u011fi mevcut.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar sorulara itiraz edilmesini gereksiz bir s\u00fcr\u00fcnceme olarak ele\u015ftirdi. Savunma sorulara y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirisini normalde oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde hemen yapmal\u0131yd\u0131. Mahkeme heyetinin, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 genellemeler i\u00e7eren itirazlar\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irmek i\u00e7in \u00e7ok zaman harcamas\u0131 gerek. Sorulara i\u00e7eriksel olarak cevap verilip verilmeyece\u011fiyse zaten me\u00e7hul; Zsch\u00e4pe m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n sorular\u0131n\u0131 cevaplamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar son olarak san\u0131k Wohlleben’in politik olarak faal oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde militan, yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 ve nasyonal sosyalist g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri savundu\u011funu ve hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde kendisinin \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi halklar\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f i\u00e7inde bir arada ya\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fiddet kullanmadan savunan biri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamak \u00fczere \u00e7ok say\u0131da delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi verdi. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Wohlleben’in daha 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda (yani NSU videolar\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131ndan sonra, ama NSU’nun kendini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce) derrosarotepanther@hotmail.de mail adresini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ipu\u00e7lar\u0131 mevcut.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131ndan yeni cambazl\u0131klar ve Wohlleben’in ideolojisi Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Jena’da 1990’lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir kavgan\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kendisinden daha \u00f6nce pek \u00e7ok kez bahsedilmi\u015f olan biri sorgulanacakt\u0131. Ama bu ki\u015fi mahkemeye gelmedi. Ard\u0131ndan mahkemenin ilk plan\u0131na g\u00f6re Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Borchert m\u00fcvekkili ad\u0131na bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapacakt\u0131. Ama bu ger\u00e7ekle\u015femeden avukat Heer s\u00f6z al\u0131p m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1197,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196\/revisions\/1197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}