Seneler boyunca Jena Yolda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma’n\u0131n \u00fcyelerine kar\u015f\u0131 soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olan iki eski Devlet G\u00fcvenlik memuru Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine bug\u00fcn ifade vermek \u00fczere mahkemeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Ancak ikisinden sadece biri ifade verebildi, di\u011fer hastayd\u0131.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k savunman\u0131n umdu\u011fu hi\u00e7bir \u015feyi s\u00f6ylemeyince sorgu yine avukat Klemke’nin kendini yorucu ve a\u011fdal\u0131 bir \u015fekilde te\u015fhir etmesiyle ge\u00e7ti. Tan\u0131k, Wohlleben’in yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 politikalarla ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek yerine 1996 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren NPD’nin ve yolda\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n faaliyetlerini kendisinin \u201ezekice\u201c arka planda kalaca\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde organize etti\u011fini anlatt\u0131 ve \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 ve yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 eylemlere bir dizi \u00f6rnek verdi. Klemke bunun \u00fczerine bir kez daha tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131ktan uzak oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Tan\u0131k \u201eTh\u00fcringen’deki %2’lik yabanc\u0131 m\u00fcfusun\u201c \u201eeski eyaletlerdeki problemlerle\u201c kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi tespitleriyle pek solcu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterse de ve \u201eNPD ve di\u011fer muhafazakar sa\u011f partiler\u201cden bahsetse de Klemke ona NPD’ye kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fiddeti destekledi\u011fini s\u00f6yletmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Bo\u015funa ger\u00e7ekle\u015fem bu sorgu pek sonu\u00e7 vermedi\u011fi halde \u00e7ok zaman harcanmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131 ve bu nedenle ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc saatlerinde Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n sorular\u0131na itirazlarla ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Wohlleben’in ideolojisi ile ilgili vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 dilek\u00e7elerine y\u00f6nelik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile (iki konuyla da ilgili olarak bkz. d\u00fcnk\u00fc blog<\/a>) olduk\u00e7a stresli bir \u015fekilde ilgilenildi.<\/p>\n Son olarak m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar avukatlar Heer, Stahl ve Sturm taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilen sorular hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundular. Federal Savc\u0131 Diemer, san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe sorular\u0131n sorulmas\u0131n\u0131 sadece blok \u015feklinde sorular sorulmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yorsa o durumda b\u00f6ylesi bir soru katalo\u011funda \u00e7ok geni\u015f sorulara da izin verilmesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n Ard\u0131ndan Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k, m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Nasyonal Sosyalist ideoloji, \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve san\u0131k Wohlleben’in militan yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerinin itiraz edilmesini talep etti. Wohlleben’in politik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ve bununla birlikte cinayet silah\u0131n\u0131n tedarik edilmesindeki rol\u00fc yeterince kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, b\u00f6ylesi delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerine art\u0131k yer yoktu. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k b\u00f6ylece mahkemeyi yine, verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmdeki delillerle ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nceden h\u00fck\u00fcm formuna sokmaya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131. Mahkeme dilek\u00e7eleri bu gerek\u00e7eyle reddederse Wohlleben’le ilgili ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7eler verilmesine f\u0131rsat kalmayacak.<\/p>\n Mahkeme bu duru\u015fman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yaz tatiline giriyor. Bir sonraki duru\u015fma 31.08.2016 tarihinde g\u00f6r\u00fclecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yine Ralf Wohlleben’in ideolojisi hakk\u0131nda Seneler boyunca Jena Yolda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma’n\u0131n \u00fcyelerine kar\u015f\u0131 soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olan iki eski Devlet G\u00fcvenlik memuru Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine bug\u00fcn ifade vermek \u00fczere mahkemeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Ancak ikisinden sadece biri ifade verebildi, di\u011fer hastayd\u0131. Tan\u0131k savunman\u0131n umdu\u011fu hi\u00e7bir \u015feyi s\u00f6ylemeyince sorgu yine avukat Klemke’nin kendini yorucu ve a\u011fdal\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1199,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198\/revisions\/1199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}