{"id":1202,"date":"2016-09-02T15:43:23","date_gmt":"2016-09-02T13:43:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1202"},"modified":"2016-09-02T15:43:23","modified_gmt":"2016-09-02T13:43:23","slug":"01-09-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/09\/02\/01-09-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"01.09.2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

Federal Kriminal Dairesi’nin soru\u015fturma metodlar\u0131 ve yeniden Jena’da 1998\/1999 y\u0131llar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bir sald\u0131r\u0131 halk\u0131nda<\/h4>\n

Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak bir Federal Kriminal Dairesi memuru bir kez daha FKD’nin pek de \u00e7aba sergilemeyen soru\u015fturma y\u00f6ntemleri hakk\u0131nda bilgi verdi: San\u0131k Carsten Schultze duru\u015fmada Wohlleben ile aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en bir konu\u015fmadan bahsetmi\u015fti. Buna g\u00f6re Wohlleben Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’la ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi bir telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131: Ona birini vurduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015flerdi. FKD’ya soru\u015fturma g\u00f6revi verilmi\u015fti, nihayetinde NSU’nun i\u015fledi\u011fi ve \u015fu ana kadar bilinmeyen ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7 s\u00f6z konusuyd\u0131.<\/p>\n

FKD memuru eyalet kriminal dairelerinden bilgi istemi\u015f ve verdikleri cevaplar\u0131 bir araya getirmi\u015fti. B\u00f6ylelikle g\u00f6revinin bitti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Oysa ki eyalet daireleri soruyu tamamen farkl\u0131 \u015fekillerde anlam\u0131\u015flard\u0131. \u00d6rne\u011fin Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg \u00e7ok say\u0131da soygundan bahsederken, Berlin sadece i\u015flenen cinayetleri, Saksonya-Anhalt ise haval\u0131 t\u00fcfekle meydana gelen yaralanmalar\u0131 bildirmi\u015fti. Memur daha fazla soru sormam\u0131\u015f ve \u00f6rne\u011fin bas\u0131n ar\u015fivleri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kendisi bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmemi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenle NSU’nun i\u015fledi\u011fi bu olas\u0131 yeni su\u00e7un \u015fu ana kadar ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 pek de \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil. Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e vermi\u015f olan Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bu durum Schultze’nin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctme \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n yeninden ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na geliyor. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc FKD Schultze’nin bahsini etti\u011fi su\u00e7u te\u015fhis edemediyse de bu durum bu soru\u015fturma y\u00f6ntemleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu su\u00e7un i\u015flenmemi\u015f odu\u011fu ve Schultze’nin ger\u00e7e\u011fi s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmiyor.<\/p>\n

Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ikinci tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 Jena’n\u0131n 1990’l\u0131 y\u0131llardaki Neonazi \u00e7evresinden ba\u015fka biriydi. Schultze bu ki\u015finin de 1998\/1999’da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sald\u0131r\u0131da olay yerinde bulundu\u011funu anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 (bkz. 21.07.2016<\/a> tarihli blog). Bu tan\u0131k da olay\u0131 hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ama olanlar\u0131 hat\u0131rlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in \u00f6zel bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi izlenimini de uyand\u0131rmad\u0131. Aksine san\u0131klar Eminger ve Wohlleben’in yan\u0131s\u0131ra bug\u00fcn mahkemeye birlikte geldi\u011fi Hammerskin Thomas Gerlach ile olan yak\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da belli oluyordu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Federal Kriminal Dairesi’nin soru\u015fturma metodlar\u0131 ve yeniden Jena’da 1998\/1999 y\u0131llar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bir sald\u0131r\u0131 halk\u0131nda Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak bir Federal Kriminal Dairesi memuru bir kez daha FKD’nin pek de \u00e7aba sergilemeyen soru\u015fturma y\u00f6ntemleri hakk\u0131nda bilgi verdi: San\u0131k Carsten Schultze duru\u015fmada Wohlleben ile aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en bir konu\u015fmadan bahsetmi\u015fti. Buna g\u00f6re Wohlleben Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’la ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi bir telefon […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1202"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1203,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1202\/revisions\/1203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}