Bug\u00fcn t\u0131bbi bilirki\u015fi san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 4.11.2011’de Fr\u00fchlingstrasse’deki binay\u0131 ate\u015fe verdi\u011fi s\u0131rada alkol etkisi alt\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili raporunu sundu. Bilirki\u015fi Zsch\u00e4pe’nin t\u00fcketti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alkol miktar\u0131n\u0131 temel alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu miktar pek inan\u0131l\u0131r de\u011fildi ve belli ki kontrol yetisinin k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belgelenmesi \u00fcmidiyle \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.. Bilirki\u015fi bu bilgilere dayanarak y\u00fcksek oranda bir alkolizasyonun teorik olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu sonucuna vard\u0131. Ama Zsch\u00e4pe ayn\u0131 zamanda bir \u015fuur kayb\u0131 hissetmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti ve onu binan\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olanlar da bunu do\u011fruluyordu. Bilirki\u015finin net sonucu: \u201cAdli t\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan fiziksel veya bili\u015fsel kabiliyetlerde bir k\u0131s\u0131tlama yok.\u201d Zsch\u00e4pe’nin bir yandan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n hayati tehlikesine engel olmak i\u00e7in her \u015feyi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatma di\u011fer yandan da su\u00e7unu hafifletecek bir sarho\u015fluk durumu uydurma \u00e7abas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde her \u015feyi birbirine kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin savunmaya, bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 raporundan \u00f6nce ba\u015fka delillerin toplanmas\u0131 isteniyor mu diye sormas\u0131 k\u0131sa bir kafa kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131. Savunma avukat\u0131 Stahl bunu mahkemenin yak\u0131nda delillerin toplanmas\u0131na son verece\u011fini duyurmas\u0131 olarak anlad\u0131. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 bunun \u00fczerine sadece \u00f6nceki bilirki\u015fi raporuyla ilgili delillerden bahsetti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Yani mahlemenin delillerin toplanmas\u0131na yak\u0131nda son verece\u011fine dair bir i\u015faret yok. Mahkeme bunun \u00fczerine Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin mektubunun (bkz. 14.09.2016<\/a> tarihli blog) kullan\u0131labilirli\u011fi ile ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri dinledi. Mahkeme bu konu hakk\u0131nda hala bir karar vermedi.<\/p>\n Mahkeme duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn yakla\u015f\u0131k son d\u00f6rt saatini yine Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131ndan gelen anlams\u0131z bir tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle red dilek\u00e7esiyle harcae\u0131: Bilirki\u015fi \u015eeygraf’\u0131n tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle g\u00f6revinden al\u0131nmas\u0131 talep ediliyordu. Seygraf Wohlleben de\u011fil Schultze hakk\u0131nda rapor vermi\u015f ve bunu da sadece gen\u00e7lik ceza hukukunun uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yapm\u015ft\u0131. Tarafl\u0131l\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7e olaraksa Schultze’ye Nazi camias\u0131ndaki yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 sloganlar hakk\u0131nda bir soru sormaya cesaret etmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyorlard\u0131. Mahkeme bu red dilek\u00e7esini dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiye reddetti. Bu da savunman\u0131n, hakimlerin kendilerinin de tarafl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 sonucuna varmas\u0131na neden oldu. B\u00f6ylece Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 en anlams\u0131z tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle red dilek\u00e7eleri konusunda Zsch\u00e4ope’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 nihai olarak geride b\u0131rak\u0131p ilk s\u0131raya ge\u00e7ti. Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n kendileri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan giderek daha da feci bir hal alan delilleri ve tan\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131 giderek daha fazla konuyla ilgisiz g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler ve \u00e7aresizce verilen dilek\u00e7elerle telafi etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 her durumda belli oluyor.<\/p>\n Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonunda \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki Sal\u0131 ve \u00c7ar\u015famba g\u00fcnleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gereken duru\u015fmalar\u0131n, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Grasel’in m\u00fcvekkiliyle mahkemenin sorular\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek i\u00e7in zamana ihtiyac\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle iptal edilece\u011fini duyudrdu. Bu sorular Per\u015fembe g\u00fcn\u00fc yan\u0131tlanacak.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 4.11.2011’de alkol alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda. Ve: Delillerin toplanmas\u0131 sona ermedi Bug\u00fcn t\u0131bbi bilirki\u015fi san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 4.11.2011’de Fr\u00fchlingstrasse’deki binay\u0131 ate\u015fe verdi\u011fi s\u0131rada alkol etkisi alt\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili raporunu sundu. Bilirki\u015fi Zsch\u00e4pe’nin t\u00fcketti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alkol miktar\u0131n\u0131 temel alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu miktar pek inan\u0131l\u0131r de\u011fildi ve belli ki kontrol yetisinin k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belgelenmesi \u00fcmidiyle \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1215"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1216,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1215\/revisions\/1216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}