{"id":1220,"date":"2016-10-05T15:00:09","date_gmt":"2016-10-05T13:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1220"},"modified":"2016-10-05T15:00:26","modified_gmt":"2016-10-05T13:00:26","slug":"05-10-2016-basin-aciklamasi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/10\/05\/05-10-2016-basin-aciklamasi\/","title":{"rendered":"05.10.2016 Bas\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cKonfeti Operasyonu\u201d. NSU taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclen Mehmet Kuba\u015fik’in yak\u0131nlar\u0131 ve avukatlar\u0131 Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu<\/h4>\n

Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi’nin eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131ndan Lothar Lingen, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz 2014 y\u0131l\u0131 Ekim ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ama ancak \u015fimdi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sorgusunda \u201cimha edilmi\u015f dosyalar art\u0131k denetlenemez\u201d demi\u015fti. Lingen b\u00f6ylelikle Federal Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yedi muhbirle ilgili dosyalar\u0131n imha edilmesi i\u00e7in 0 Kas\u0131m 2011’de verdi\u011fi emrin ard\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eyi dile getirmi\u015fti: Bu dosyalar\u0131n NSU soru\u015fturmalar\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilmesi gerekiyordu. Lingen buna g\u00f6re dosyalar\u0131 gereksiz i\u015ften kurtulmak i\u00e7in imha ettirdi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik inanmas\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 kendi kendine \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f ve dosyalar\u0131n kasti \u015fekilde imha edildi\u011fini itiraf etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Lingens, NSU Kompleksi Meclis Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Komisyonu’nun 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2016 tarihli oturumunda al\u0131nt\u0131 yap\u0131lan sorgusunda \u015funlar\u0131 anlat\u0131yordu:<\/p>\n

\u201cBen (yani Lothar Lingen) hen\u00fcz 10\/11 Kas\u0131m 2011’de Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi’nin Th\u00fcringen’deki kaynaklar\u0131n\u0131n kamuoyunu \u00e7ok ilgilendirdi\u011finin tamamen fark\u0131ndayd\u0131m. Th\u00fcringen’de o zamanlar Daire taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilen ve sekiz, dokuz ya da on vakada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kaynaklar\u0131n rakamsal verileri, Anayasay\u0131 Koruma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn ter\u00f6rist faaliyetlerinden hangi sebepten haberlerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusunu g\u00fcndeme getirmi\u015fti. \u00c7\u0131plak rakamlar olanlardan haberimiz oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeydi, ama ger\u00e7ek bu de\u011fildi. O noktada niceliksel durum, yani Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma ve Th\u00fcringen alan\u0131ndaki kaynaklar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131 bilinmiyorsa Dairenin bundan neden haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusunun belki de hi\u00e7 g\u00fcndeme gelmemi\u015f oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcm.\u201d<\/p>\n

Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k Lingen’in bu sorgu tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi’nden ve b\u00f6ylece m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lardan da bug\u00fcne kadar saklad\u0131. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k hatta, duru\u015fmada ger\u00e7eklere uygun olmayan bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirecek kadar ileri gitti. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Lothar Lingen’in ifade vermesi i\u00e7in 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 A\u011fustos ay\u0131nda vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 dilek\u00e7enin reddeilmesini talep ederek buna gerek\u00e7e olarak m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n dosyalar\u0131n ceza davas\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilmeleri i\u00e7in Lingen taraf\u0131ndan kas\u0131tl\u0131 \u015fekilde imha edilmi\u015f oldu\u011funa dair iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u201cgeli\u015fig\u00fczel ve \u015fu ana kadar edilinen t\u00fcm bilgilere ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde spek\u00fclatif\u201d olmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi.<\/p>\n

4 Nisan 2006 tarihinde NSU \u00fcyeleri taraf\u0131ndan Dortmund’da \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclen Mehmet Kuba\u015f\u0131k’\u0131n dul e\u015fi Elif, k\u0131z\u0131 Gamze Kuba\u015f\u0131k ve ailenin avukatlar\u0131 i\u00e7in dosyalar\u0131n kas\u0131tl\u0131 \u015fekilde imha edilmesi ve bu konuya y\u00f6nelik tutum, Anayasay\u0131 Koruma makamlar\u0131 ve Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n olaylar\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatmaya y\u00f6nelik isteksizli\u011finin bir di\u011fer kan\u0131t\u0131.<\/p>\n

Elif Kuba\u015f\u0131k bu konuyla ilgili olarak \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundu: \u201cBize olaylar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6z verilmi\u015fti, ama bunun tam tersi s\u00f6z konusu. Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi’nin eline kocam\u0131n cinayetine engel olunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek bilgiler ge\u00e7mi\u015f miydi, bilmek istiyorum.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u0130mza sahipleri bug\u00fcn bu nedenle -ayn\u0131 zamanda Elif ve Gamze Kuba\u015f\u0131k ad\u0131na da- K\u00f6ln Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Lothar Lingen’e ve Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi’nin \u015fu ana kadar bilinmeyen ba\u015fka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 cezas\u0131z kalmaya yol a\u00e7ma su\u00e7u, belgelerin gizlenmesi ve belgelerin muhafaza edilmemesi nedenleriyle su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu.<\/p>\n

Antonia von der Behrens, avukat
\nCarsten Ilius, avukat
\nSebastian Scharmer, avukat
\nDr. Peer Stolle, avukat<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cKonfeti Operasyonu\u201d. NSU taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclen Mehmet Kuba\u015fik’in yak\u0131nlar\u0131 ve avukatlar\u0131 Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Federal Dairesi’nin eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131ndan Lothar Lingen, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz 2014 y\u0131l\u0131 Ekim ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ama ancak \u015fimdi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sorgusunda \u201cimha edilmi\u015f dosyalar art\u0131k denetlenemez\u201d demi\u015fti. Lingen b\u00f6ylelikle Federal Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi i\u00e7in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1221,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220\/revisions\/1221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}