{"id":1222,"date":"2016-10-10T19:07:55","date_gmt":"2016-10-10T17:07:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1222"},"modified":"2016-10-10T19:07:55","modified_gmt":"2016-10-10T17:07:55","slug":"06-10-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/10\/10\/06-10-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"06.10.2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>\u201eBu karar bir h\u00fck\u00fcm gerek\u00e7esi gibi\u201c<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn yine sorgulanan bir tan\u0131k olmad\u0131. Gelmesi planlanan tek tan\u0131k mazeretliydi ve \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta ifade vermesi gerekecek.<\/p>\n<p>M\u00fcdahil avukat Yavuz Narin, Berlin Polisi&#8217;nin g\u00fcvenlik biriminden bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak ifade vermesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi. Bu ki\u015fi 2000 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos&#8217;un ba\u015fka ki\u015filerler birlikte Berlin Rykestra\u00dfe&#8217;deki sinagogu nas\u0131l g\u00f6zetlediklerini g\u00f6zlemlemi\u015fti. Bu da Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin, cinayetlerden sonradan haberi oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n aksine \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 cinayet serisinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131ndan \u00f6nce olaylar\u0131n g\u00f6zetlenmesine kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayacak bir durumdu. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme bunun ard\u0131ndan Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini reddetti\u011fi \u00e7ok say\u0131da uzunca h\u00fckm\u00fc okudu. Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 buna kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunarak tepki verdi. Avukat Klemke biraz \u00e7aresiz bir \u015fekilde \u015fu saptamada bulundu: \u201eBu karar bir h\u00fck\u00fcm gerek\u00e7esi gibi.\u201c<\/p>\n<p>Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin tutuklu olan bir ba\u015fka Neonazi&#8217;ye yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 mektubun (bkz. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/09\/17\/14-09-2016\/\" target=\"_blank\">14.09.2016<\/a> tarihli blog) okunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen dilek\u00e7eyle ilgili olarak heyet halen bir karar vermedi. Daha da \u00f6tesi dilek\u00e7e halen tamamlanmad\u0131. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131, bu mektubun ve Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revden al\u0131nmas\u0131 talebiyle ilgili olaral mahkemeye yazm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ba\u015fka bir mektubun yan\u0131s\u0131ra aralar\u0131nda eski avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Strurm&#8217;a y\u00f6nelik olarak 2015 Temmuz ay\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu su\u00e7 duyurusunun da oldu\u011fu ba\u015fka belgelerin de okunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015fecek olan duru\u015fma iptal oldu. Davaya 12.10.2016 tarihinde devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201eBu karar bir h\u00fck\u00fcm gerek\u00e7esi gibi\u201c Bug\u00fcn yine sorgulanan bir tan\u0131k olmad\u0131. Gelmesi planlanan tek tan\u0131k mazeretliydi ve \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta ifade vermesi gerekecek. M\u00fcdahil avukat Yavuz Narin, Berlin Polisi&#8217;nin g\u00fcvenlik biriminden bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak ifade vermesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi. Bu ki\u015fi 2000 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos&#8217;un ba\u015fka ki\u015filerler birlikte Berlin Rykestra\u00dfe&#8217;deki sinagogu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1222"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1224,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1222\/revisions\/1224"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}