{"id":1235,"date":"2016-10-28T08:26:47","date_gmt":"2016-10-28T06:26:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1235"},"modified":"2016-10-28T08:26:47","modified_gmt":"2016-10-28T06:26:47","slug":"27-10-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/10\/28\/27-10-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"27.10.2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Bo\u015fa ge\u00e7en bir duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daha<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ilk tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 Jena yerel ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan bir y\u00f6neticiydi. Bu y\u00f6netici bug\u00fcn yeniden Jena-Winzerla son dura\u011f\u0131nda ah\u015fap bir kul\u00fcbenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ama duraktaki sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131n\u0131n, ah\u015fap kul\u00fcbenin duraktan ka\u00e7arken girmi\u015f oldu\u011fu yak\u0131nlardaki k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir bah\u00e7elikte bulundu\u011funu defalarca sanlatmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan (bkz. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/10\/28\/26-10-2016\/\" target=\"_blank\">26.10.2016<\/a> tarihli blog) bu ifadenin bir \u00f6nemi yoktu. Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 buna ra\u011fmen hi\u00e7bir \u015fey olmam\u0131\u015f izlenimini vermeyi denedi. Tan\u0131ktan \u00f6\u011frenmek istedikleri aras\u0131nda o zamanlar, yani 16-18 y\u0131l \u00f6nce o duraktan ge\u00e7en S-Bahn (h\u0131zl\u0131 tren) hatt\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerinin kimler oldu\u011funu da vard\u0131.\u00a0Sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fduru ve o zaman ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131nda olan ve ka\u00e7arak polisi arayan e\u015flik\u00e7isi, 7 Kas\u0131m haftas\u0131nda ifade vermek \u00fczere \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131lar. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahil avukat Langer tan\u0131k olarak sorguland\u0131. B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos taraf\u0131ndan muhtemel olarak ba\u015fka bir kez daha ate\u015f edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na (bkz. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2016\/09\/02\/01-09-2016\/\" target=\"_blank\">01.09.2016<\/a> tarihli blog) ve duraktaki olaya y\u00f6nelik olarak soru\u015fturma memurlar\u0131na desek olmak amac\u0131yla onlara iki kez gazete haberleri ula\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu haberler d\u00fcn ve bug\u00fcn okundular. Langer, bunlar\u0131n haberlerin asl\u0131na uygun kopyalar\u0131, yani foto\u011fraflar\u0131 oldu\u011funu do\u011frulad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme bunun sonras\u0131nda Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130svi\u00e7reli bir polis memuresinin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyi bu memurenin soru\u015fturma raporunu okuduktan sonra reddetti. Savunma, bu dilek\u00e7eyle de cinayet silah\u0131 Ceska&#8217;n\u0131n tedarik zinciri hakk\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphe yaratmak istiyordu. Memurenin raporundan anlatacak \u00f6nemli hi\u00e7bir \u015feyi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaten anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<br \/>\nWohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 bunu yine, hakimleri s\u00f6zde tarafl\u0131l\u0131k gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmek i\u00e7in bir bahane olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc. Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilen her delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esine hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esiyle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermesi NSU davas\u0131nda art\u0131k bir gelene\u011fe d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f durumda. Bu arada mahkeme de bu konuda o kadar deneyim kazand\u0131 ki bu gerek\u00e7esiz dilek\u00e7eler genelde bir sonraki duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnde reddediliyor.<\/p>\n<p>Duru\u015fmaya yeniden bir hafta ara verilecek ve 08.11.2016 tarihinde devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bo\u015fa ge\u00e7en bir duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daha Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ilk tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 Jena yerel ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan bir y\u00f6neticiydi. Bu y\u00f6netici bug\u00fcn yeniden Jena-Winzerla son dura\u011f\u0131nda ah\u015fap bir kul\u00fcbenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ama duraktaki sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131n\u0131n, ah\u015fap kul\u00fcbenin duraktan ka\u00e7arken girmi\u015f oldu\u011fu yak\u0131nlardaki k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir bah\u00e7elikte bulundu\u011funu defalarca sanlatmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan (bkz. 26.10.2016 tarihli blog) bu ifadenin bir \u00f6nemi yoktu. Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1235"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1236,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235\/revisions\/1236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}