Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n tamam\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n ortadan kaybolmalar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce onlarla ve Rolf Wohlleben’le arkada\u015f olan ve Wohlleben arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Nazi camias\u0131na kat\u0131lan Jenal\u0131 bir tan\u0131\u011fa ayr\u0131ld\u0131. Tan\u0131k belli ki sadece yola ge\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmakla kalmay\u0131p yolunu da \u015fa\u015f\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Sorgusuna ancak \u00f6\u011fle yeme\u011finin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015flanabildi. Mahkeme arada ge\u00e7en zamandan yararlanabilirdi, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc okunmas\u0131 gereken kimi belgeler vard\u0131. Ancak Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 buna itiraz etti ve mahkeme g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki bu itirazla ilgili olarak hemen karar verebilecek durumda de\u011fildi. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 bunun ard\u0131ndan \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n Beate Zsch\u00e4pe ile ilgili raporunu okumas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nerdi. Ancak bu da Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan reddedildi: Belirsiz bir s\u00fcre buna haz\u0131rlanmalar\u0131 gerekiyordu. Yani t\u00fcm sabah yine bir i\u015fe yaramadan ge\u00e7ti.<\/p>\n
\u00d6\u011flenden itibaren tan\u0131k sorguland\u0131. Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe 26’daki enkazda bulunan bir cep telefonundan 2000 yaz\u0131ndan bir mesajla\u015fma ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Mesajla\u015fmada biri \u201eEbi’den art\u0131k hi\u00e7 haber yok\u201c diye \u015fikayet ediyordu, buna \u201eyapabilirse saat 21’de arayacak!\u201c cevab\u0131 gelmi\u015fti. \u201eEbi\u201c takma isminin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n soyad\u0131na uymas\u0131 olas\u0131. San\u0131kla olan arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda daha 90’lar\u0131n ortas\u0131nda Wohlleben i\u00e7in kendi ad\u0131na bir posta kutusu kaydettirmi\u015f ve 1999’da bir ka\u00e7 ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na Wohlleben’in yan\u0131nda ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca Askeri Kar\u015f\u0131-\u0130stihbarat Servisi’ndeki iki sorguda \u00f6zellikle Wohlleben ile ilgili \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgiler vermi\u015f olmas\u0131 da (ancak sadece ikinci sorgunun tutana\u011f\u0131 mevcut, ilki yok) ortadan kaybolan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcye yard\u0131m etmi\u015f oldu\u011funun i\u015faretleriydi.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusu, di\u011fer Nazi tan\u0131klarla ilgili bir d\u00e9j\u00e0-vu hissi ya\u015fatt\u0131. O zamanlar \u00e7ok para kazanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan hep cep telefonlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve onlar\u0131 ba\u015fkalar\u0131na \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 verdi\u011fini, Wohlleben’e de \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 verip vermemi\u015f oldu\u011funu art\u0131k hat\u0131rlama\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Wohlleben \u00e7ok d\u00fcr\u00fcst bir insand\u0131, hep dostlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131ndayd\u0131. Buna ra\u011fmen \u00fc\u00e7 \u201eyolda\u015f\u0131n\u0131n\u201c ortadan kaybolmas\u0131 ve nerede bulunduklar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ne Wohlleben ile ne de ba\u015fka Jenal\u0131larla hi\u00e7 konu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ftu. Dava taraflar\u0131 bu iddiaya inanmad\u0131lar ve sinirlendiler. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131ktan Weingarten bile biraz aksile\u015fti ve daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 sorular sordu. Amac\u0131 muhtemelen yalan ifade vermekten a\u00e7\u0131labilecek olan bir dava i\u00e7in tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n net yalanlar\u0131n\u0131 saptamakt\u0131.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k t\u00fcm sorular\u0131 hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6n s\u00fcrerek savu\u015fturmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu s\u0131rada s\u0131k s\u0131k bocalad\u0131 ve kendisiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. \u0130fadenin sonunda hala Nazi g\u00f6sterilerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi (ki bu Wohlleben ile ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hala mevcut olabilece\u011finin lehine bir i\u015faret) \u00e7ok \u00f6nemliydi. Ayr\u0131ca Jena’dan \u201eEbi\u201c ya da \u201eEbii\u201c takma isimli birinin daha bulundu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k son olarak muhbir olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusuna da tatmin edici bir yan\u0131t vermek istemedi. \u00d6nce \u201eVP\u201cnin belki de \u201eVolkseigener Petrieb\u201c (\u00e7evirenin notu: Volkseigener Betrieb, Halk \u0130\u015fletmesi anlam\u0131na geliyor, Petrieb ise bu kelimenin yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hali) anlam\u0131na gelebilece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik aptalca bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundu, ard\u0131ndansa bir taahh\u00fctname imzalay\u0131p imzalamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusuna okumadan imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok say\u0131da belge oldu\u011fu yan\u0131t\u0131n\u0131 verdi. Muhbir faaliyetine y\u00f6nelik net bir cevap vermekten \u00e7ekinmesi tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yalan ifade vermekten ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ama muhbir olarak bir faaliyetini itiraf etmek de istemedi\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. Yani tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n Militer Kar\u015f\u0131-\u0130stihbarat Servisi, Th\u00fcringen Eyalet Dairesi ya da ba\u015fka bir makam i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hen\u00fcz belli olmad\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Savunman\u0131n blokaj\u0131 ve yine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiz bir tan\u0131k Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n tamam\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n ortadan kaybolmalar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce onlarla ve Rolf Wohlleben’le arkada\u015f olan ve Wohlleben arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Nazi camias\u0131na kat\u0131lan Jenal\u0131 bir tan\u0131\u011fa ayr\u0131ld\u0131. Tan\u0131k belli ki sadece yola ge\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmakla kalmay\u0131p yolunu da \u015fa\u015f\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Sorgusuna ancak \u00f6\u011fle yeme\u011finin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015flanabildi. Mahkeme arada ge\u00e7en zamandan yararlanabilirdi, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1239"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1239\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1240,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1239\/revisions\/1240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}