M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Brandenburglu muhbir y\u00f6neticisi G\u00f6rlitz ve muhbir Carsten Szczepanski aras\u0131nda 25.08.1998 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye dair bir tutana\u011f\u0131n dava kapsam\u0131nda incelenip okunabilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi G\u00f6rlitz\u2019in Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi\u2019nde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sorgusu s\u0131ras\u0131nda yalan s\u00f6ylemi\u015f oldu\u011funu ortaya koyuyor (bu sorgularla ilgili olarak bkz. 16.06.2016<\/a>, 01.07.2015<\/a>, 29.07.2015<\/a> ve 02.03.2016<\/a> tarihli bloglar).<\/p>\n Konu somut olarak \u015fu: Irk\u00e7\u0131 bir \u015fiddet eylemi nedeniyle uzun s\u00fcreli bir hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan Carsten Szczepanski, Brandenburg Eyalet Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi taraf\u0131nda i\u015fe al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve g\u00f6revleri aras\u0131nda B\u00f6hnhardt, Mundlos ve Zsch\u00e4pe ile ilgili olarak Blood and Honour\u2019un Saksonya \u201cb\u00f6l\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201dnde casusluk yapmak da vard\u0131. Eyalet Dairesi\u2019nin Szczepanski\u2019ye verdi\u011fi bir cep telefonunda \u201c\u00e7at pata ne oldu?\u201d diye, muhtemelen Chemnitzli Blood and Honour aktivisti Jan Werner\u2019den gelmi\u015f olan bir mesaj vard\u0131. Bu mesaj bir silah tedari\u011fi te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcne i\u015faret ediyordu.<\/p>\n G\u00f6rlitz mahkemeye o s\u0131rada eski i\u015f telefonunu geri vermi\u015f ve kapatm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle mesajdan hi\u00e7 haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k bahsi ge\u00e7en tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re -delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re- G\u00f6rlitz\u2019in bu ifadesi yalan ifadeydi, telefon daha uzun bir s\u00fcre a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 ve kullan\u0131mdayd\u0131. Dilek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re bunun yan\u0131nda Szczepanski ve Jan Werner aras\u0131nda bir bulu\u015fma ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fti: Orada belki de bir silah m\u0131 teslim edilmi\u015fti?<\/p>\n Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 bu dilek\u00e7eye pek sevinmedi, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc dilek\u00e7eye bahsi ge\u00e7en ve \u201cgizli\u201d damgal\u0131 tutana\u011f\u0131n bir kopyas\u0131 da ili\u015ftirilmi\u015fti. G\u00f6tzl dilek\u00e7enin ve tutana\u011f\u0131n kopyalanmamas\u0131 ve dava kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131na teslim edilmemesi talimat\u0131n\u0131 verdi. \u00d6nce tutana\u011f\u0131n gizli tutulma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda ne yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini denetlemek istiyord\u0131. Yani heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 delillerin toplanmas\u0131na bir kez daha engel oldu.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fkan bunun ard\u0131ndan birka\u00e7 belgenin okunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu ve bu da yine Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n anlams\u0131z bir hakimin reddi dilek\u00e7esi daha vermesiyle son buldu. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0131srar\u0131 \u00fczerine yar\u0131nki duru\u015fma iptal edilmedi, duru\u015fmaya devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131ndan hakimin tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle reddi i\u00e7in ufak bir dilek\u00e7e ve: Muhbir \u201cG\u00f6rlitz\u201d M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yalan m\u0131 s\u00f6yledi? M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Brandenburglu muhbir y\u00f6neticisi G\u00f6rlitz ve muhbir Carsten Szczepanski aras\u0131nda 25.08.1998 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye dair bir tutana\u011f\u0131n dava kapsam\u0131nda incelenip okunabilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi G\u00f6rlitz\u2019in Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi\u2019nde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sorgusu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1245"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1245\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1246,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1245\/revisions\/1246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}