Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duur\u015fma d\u00fcnk\u00fcnden biraz daha uzun s\u00fcrd\u00fc: Mahkeme yakla\u015f\u0131k 70 dakika s\u00fcresince, 2000 y\u0131l\u0131 May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos’un ba\u015fka iki ki\u015fiyle birlikte Berlin Rykestra\u00dfe’deki sinagogun hemen yan\u0131ndaki bir kafede oturdu\u011funu g\u00f6ren Berlinli bir g\u00fcvenlik polisinin ifadesini ald\u0131. Hem tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisinin (bkz. 26.10.2016<\/a> tarihli rapor) hem de onu sorgulayan polis memurunun (bkz. 23.11.2016<\/a> tarihli blog) tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n o zamanki ifadesini \u00f6z\u00fcnde do\u011frulay\u0131p ancak t\u00fcm ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 hat\u0131rlayamamalar\u0131 nedeniyle tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisi bug\u00fcn yeniden \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Mahkeme d\u00fcn duyurdu\u011fu gibi tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2000 tarihli sorgusunun tutana\u011f\u0131ndan belli k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 \u201chaf\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 desteklemek\u201d amac\u0131yla okudu.\u00a0<\/p>\n Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakim G\u00f6tzl’\u00fcn eski sorgular\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 okumas\u0131 yni bir \u015fey de\u011fil. Ama bu bug\u00fcne kadar hep haturlatma \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fiyordu. O durumda delil olarak, okunan metin de\u011fil tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ona dair verdi\u011fi bilgi kabul ediliyordu. Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc gibi bir \u201etamamlay\u0131c\u0131 okuma\u201cda ise buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k okunan sorgu tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin kendisi delil olarak kabul ediliyor. Bu da heyetin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesine b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem verdi\u011fini ve onu muhtemelen verece\u011fi kararda esas alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyor.\u00a0 Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n verdi\u011fi bilgiler, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin olas\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 hedeflerinin g\u00f6zetlenmesiyle do\u011frudan ilgisi oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterdi\u011finden bu anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir durum. (Konunn ancak m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine dikkate al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n NSU’nun 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda kendini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yeniden sorgulanmas\u0131n\u0131n bile o zamanlar gereksiz g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131 bu a\u00e7\u0131dan bak\u0131l\u0131nca manidar.)<\/p>\n Savunman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, do\u011frudan aleyhlerine olan bir delile kar\u015f\u0131 kendilerini savunmalar\u0131, en az\u0131ndan bunu denemeleri akla yatk\u0131n olurdu. Ama bunu yapmad\u0131lar. Avukat Stahl, heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n tavr\u0131ndan \u201erahats\u0131zl\u0131k duyduklar\u0131n\u0131\u201c belirtti, ama etti\u011fi itiraz\u0131 da hemen geri ald\u0131.<\/p>\n Okunan belgelerin ard\u0131ndan heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 duru\u015fmay\u0131 11’e do\u011fru sonland\u0131rd\u0131. Yar\u0131nki delil program\u0131 da \u00e7ok s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131. Bu da bu davan\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesinin esas nedeninin m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n dilek\u00e7eleri de\u011fil mahkemenin davay\u0131 yava\u015f y\u00f6netmesi oldu\u011funu bir kez daha g\u00f6sterdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sinagogun g\u00f6zetlenmesine dair daha fazla bilgi \u2013 Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131 delillerden \u201crahats\u0131z oldu\u201d Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duur\u015fma d\u00fcnk\u00fcnden biraz daha uzun s\u00fcrd\u00fc: Mahkeme yakla\u015f\u0131k 70 dakika s\u00fcresince, 2000 y\u0131l\u0131 May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos’un ba\u015fka iki ki\u015fiyle birlikte Berlin Rykestra\u00dfe’deki sinagogun hemen yan\u0131ndaki bir kafede oturdu\u011funu g\u00f6ren Berlinli bir g\u00fcvenlik polisinin ifadesini ald\u0131. Hem tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisinin (bkz. 26.10.2016 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1257"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1258,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions\/1258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}