{"id":1277,"date":"2017-01-13T15:22:43","date_gmt":"2017-01-13T14:22:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1277"},"modified":"2017-01-13T15:22:43","modified_gmt":"2017-01-13T14:22:43","slug":"11-01-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/01\/13\/11-01-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"11.01.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bir giri\u015fimi daha ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131. Ve Prof. Sa\u00df\u2019\u0131n raporu gecikmeye devam ediyor.<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak san\u0131k Carsten Schultze hakk\u0131nda rapor yazm\u0131\u015f olan bilirki\u015fi Prof. Leygraf bir kez daha sorguland\u0131. Kendisine verilmi\u015f olan esas g\u00f6rev, olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u0131rada 19-20 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan Schultze\u2019nin gen\u00e7lik ceza hukukuna g\u00f6re cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi sorusuna a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirmesiydi. Ancak bug\u00fcnk\u00fc konu ba\u015fkayd\u0131: Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131, Schultze\u2019nin Wohlleben\u2019in ciddi \u015fekilde aleyhine olan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n inan\u0131l\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla onun \u00e7e\u015fitli psikolojik hastal\u0131klara sahip oldu\u011funu iddia ediyordu. Leygraf Schultze\u2019yi ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde incelemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan ona bu konuda neler bildi\u011fi soruldu. Leygraf Schultze\u2019nin b\u00f6yesi bir hastal\u0131k belirtisi g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordu ve savunman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten de beceriksiz sorgusu da bunu de\u011fi\u015ftiremedi.<!--more--><br \/>\nFederal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin eski avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Sturm\u2019un Prof. Sa\u00df\u2019\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporuna y\u00f6nelik d\u00fcn vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 dilek\u00e7elerle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirerek bu dilek\u00e7e\u015ferin hepsinin reddedilmesini talep ettiler. Avukatlar ise buna yar\u0131n sabah cevap vereceklerini duyurdular. Mahkemenin bu dilek\u00e7elerle ilgili verece\u011fi karar i\u00e7in zamana ihtiyac\u0131 oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z s\u0131ras\u0131n\u0131n Prof. Sa\u00df\u2019a yar\u0131n da gelmemesi olas\u0131. Yar\u0131n i\u00e7in \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan ba\u015fka bir tan\u0131k yok.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bir giri\u015fimi daha ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131. Ve Prof. Sa\u00df\u2019\u0131n raporu gecikmeye devam ediyor. Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak san\u0131k Carsten Schultze hakk\u0131nda rapor yazm\u0131\u015f olan bilirki\u015fi Prof. Leygraf bir kez daha sorguland\u0131. Kendisine verilmi\u015f olan esas g\u00f6rev, olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u0131rada 19-20 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan Schultze\u2019nin gen\u00e7lik ceza hukukuna g\u00f6re cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi sorusuna a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirmesiydi. Ancak bug\u00fcnk\u00fc [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1277"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1278,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions\/1278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}