{"id":1289,"date":"2017-01-26T09:47:41","date_gmt":"2017-01-26T08:47:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1289"},"modified":"2017-01-26T09:47:41","modified_gmt":"2017-01-26T08:47:41","slug":"24-01-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/01\/26\/24-01-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"24.01.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin avukatlar\u0131 bilirki\u015fiyi beceriksizce sorgulad\u0131<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df &#8216;\u0131n sorgusuna devam edilmeden \u00f6nce ilk olarak 1990&#8217;lar ve 2000&#8217;li y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda Jena&#8217;da g\u00f6rev yapm\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuru sorguland\u0131. \u0130kisi de pek bir \u015fey hat\u0131rlam\u0131yordu, \u00f6zellikle \u201esa\u011f-sol \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131\u201c ve \u201epropaganda su\u00e7lar\u0131\u201c ile ile ilgileniyorlard\u0131. San\u0131k Wohlleben&#8217;in yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 bir faaliyetinden haberleri yoktu. Ama b\u00f6ylesi faaliyetlerle pek ilgilenmedikleri de anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Ard\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df \u00f6nce Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorusu \u00fczerine, san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe&#8217;deki yang\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn bir duygudurum bozuklu\u011fu sonucu psikolojik bir fonksiyon bozuklu\u011fu ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair hi\u00e7bir belirtinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Ard\u0131ndan bilirki\u015finin Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin kendi se\u00e7ti\u011fi avukat Borchert taraf\u0131ndan sorgulanmas\u0131yla duru\u015fma olumsuz anlamda doruk noktalar\u0131ndan birini ya\u015fad\u0131: Borchert bilirki\u015fiyi raporundaki kimi detaylar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrebilece\u011fini ve haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131karabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordu. Borchert \u00f6zellikle de bilirki\u015finin, Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin kendisi ve Grasel taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ve Sa\u00df&#8217;\u0131n do\u011fruluktan uzak ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir duygu ifadesinden yoksun olarak tan\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine sald\u0131rd\u0131. Bu sorgu \u00e7ok beceriksizce ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi, doruk noktas\u0131 ise Sa\u00df&#8217;\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcn bir duygu ifadesine sahip oldu\u011funu tespit etmesi i\u00e7in bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada nas\u0131l ifadeler olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi sorusu idi.<\/p>\n<p>Sanki Zsch\u00e4pe Borchert&#8217;e raporda ho\u015funa gitmeyen yerleri s\u00f6ylemi\u015f gibi bir izlenim olu\u015ftu. Borchert di\u011fer yandan kapsaml\u0131 dosyalardaki bilgilere dayanan tek bir soru bile sormad\u0131.\u00a0 Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n Sa\u00df&#8217;a Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin bile \u015fahsi \u201em\u00fcdahalede\u201c bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde ba\u015far\u0131yla sald\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 daha sorgunun ba\u015f\u0131nda belli oldu.<\/p>\n<p>Borchert Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin tutuklu bir Neonazi&#8217;ye yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 mektubundan kimi k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n ona ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131 internetten ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir foto\u011fraf\u0131 da internetten kopyalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti. Zsch\u00e4pe \u015fahsen s\u00f6z alarak bu bilgiyi do\u011frulad\u0131. Ama bu bilgi anlaml\u0131 de\u011fildi, bilirki\u015fi mektubun bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 zaten pek \u00f6nemli bulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken nas\u0131l olup da internette bulunan \u00f6rneklere ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131ysa me\u00e7hul.<\/p>\n<p>Borchert bilirki\u015finin Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos&#8217;un durumlar\u0131n\u0131 ve gelece\u011fi hep \u00fcmitsiz olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fcklerine (\u201cya\u015fam rezil\u201d) y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na dair de\u011ferlendirmesini Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndaki tek bir ifadeye dayand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131 bunun \u00fczerine m\u00fcdahale ederek \u201cUwelerle\u201d ilgili bu al\u0131nt\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamada toplam \u00fc\u00e7 kez ge\u00e7ti\u011fini belirtti. Bunun \u00fczerine savunman\u0131n ata\u011f\u0131 sona erdi ve sorgu hemen sona erdi.<\/p>\n<p>Sorguya yar\u0131n \u201eeski avukatlar\u201c Stahl, Sturm ve Heer ile devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin avukatlar\u0131 bilirki\u015fiyi beceriksizce sorgulad\u0131 Bug\u00fcn bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df &#8216;\u0131n sorgusuna devam edilmeden \u00f6nce ilk olarak 1990&#8217;lar ve 2000&#8217;li y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda Jena&#8217;da g\u00f6rev yapm\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuru sorguland\u0131. \u0130kisi de pek bir \u015fey hat\u0131rlam\u0131yordu, \u00f6zellikle \u201esa\u011f-sol \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131\u201c ve \u201epropaganda su\u00e7lar\u0131\u201c ile ile ilgileniyorlard\u0131. San\u0131k Wohlleben&#8217;in yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 bir faaliyetinden haberleri yoktu. Ama b\u00f6ylesi faaliyetlerle [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1289"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1290,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1289\/revisions\/1290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}