San\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n elle yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 notlar\u0131n hepsini davada g\u00f6rebilme \u00e7abas\u0131 ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n Prof. Sa\u00df’a birka\u00e7 soru y\u00f6neltmesinin ard\u0131ndan avukatlar bilirki\u015finin 700’\u00fcn \u00fcst\u00fcnde sayfa tutan notlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda getirmemesinde duyduklar\u0131 \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade ettiler. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 iki hafta \u00f6nce Sa\u00df’\u0131n notlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesinin ve savunman\u0131n o halde o an i\u00e7in ba\u015fka bir sorular\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesinin ard\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fiyi kendisi sorgulam\u0131\u015f ve bu hafta mahkemeye yeniden gelmesini istemi\u015fti. Heer, Stahl ve Sturm bunun \u00fczerine g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki bilirki\u015finin notlar\u0131n\u0131 tabii ki yan\u0131nda getirece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015flerdi. Ancak Sa\u00df belgelerini bu sefer de evde b\u0131rakarak t\u00fcm \u00f6nemli g\u00f6zlemlerini rapora ge\u00e7irdi\u011fine i\u015faret etti. Ger\u00e7ekten de hem ge\u00e7en sefer hem de bug\u00fcn Zsch\u00e4pe’nin duru\u015fma salonundaki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla ilgili g\u00f6zlemlerini \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Eski avukatlar g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki Sa\u00df’\u0131 anlatt\u0131klar\u0131ndaki olas\u0131 eksikliklerle y\u00fczle\u015ftirebilecek bir halde de\u011filler. Ayr\u0131ca b\u00f6ylesi eksikliklerin onlar\u0131n da g\u00f6z\u00fcne \u00e7arpmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 izlenimi olu\u015fuyor. Heer, Stahl ve Sturm b\u00f6ylelikle bir kez daha pasif olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ve formalitelerle ilgilendiklerini g\u00f6sterdiler. Kendileri faaliyete ge\u00e7mek ve Sa\u00df’\u0131n raporunun i\u00e7eri\u011fiyle ilgili m\u00fccadeleci bir \u015fekilde somut tart\u0131\u015fmalar y\u00fcr\u00fctek yerine mahkemenin \u00f6nemsiz \u015feyleri tedarik etmesini destekleyecek uzun dilek\u00e7eler veriyorlar. Bir eyalet y\u00fcksek mahkemesinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen politik bir ceza davas\u0131nda bu \u015fekilde savunmada bulunman\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe’nin yeni avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131ktan uzak hikayelerle kendilerini temize \u00e7\u0131karma \u00e7abas\u0131 kadar az ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 var.<\/p>\n
Son olarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131 Sa\u00df’dan notlar\u0131ndan bilgiler aktarmas\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdiler. Mahkeme bu dilek\u00e7eyi yar\u0131n sabah erkenden reddedecek. Bilirki\u015finin sorgusu b\u00f6ylece \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki iki g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde sona erebilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n sorgusuna devam \u2013 Notlar i\u00e7in verilen m\u00fccadele ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z San\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin eski avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n elle yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 notlar\u0131n hepsini davada g\u00f6rebilme \u00e7abas\u0131 ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n Prof. Sa\u00df’a birka\u00e7 soru y\u00f6neltmesinin ard\u0131ndan avukatlar bilirki\u015finin 700’\u00fcn \u00fcst\u00fcnde sayfa tutan notlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda getirmemesinde duyduklar\u0131 \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade ettiler. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 iki hafta \u00f6nce Sa\u00df’\u0131n notlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1300"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1300\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1301,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1300\/revisions\/1301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}