Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda mahkeme Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcn vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu dilek\u00e7eyi reddetti. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Sturm bunun \u00fczerine -uzun bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme aras\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan- hakimlerin tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle reddedilmeleri i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in 2,5 saat daha ara verilmesini talep ettiler. Ancak sadece san\u0131klar\u0131n kendileri hakimleri reddedebilir. Avukatlar\u0131, onlar\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 olmadan ya da onlar\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 bu talepte bulunmamazlar. Ve Zsch\u00e4pe heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n sorusu \u00fczerine Heer, Stahl ve Sturm’un kendisiyle uzla\u015fmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n
Eski avukatlar, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n sorusu \u00fczerine fikrinin de\u011fi\u015fmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen \u00f6\u011flen aras\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan da dilek\u00e7elerinde \u0131srar ettiler. Mahkeme bu nedenle duru\u015fmaya ara verilmesi i\u00e7in verilen dilek\u00e7eyi reddetti. Heer, Stahl ve Sturm red dilek\u00e7esini b\u00f6ylelikle b\u0131rakt\u0131lar.<\/p>\n
Ard\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fi \u00f6nce avukat Sturm, ard\u0131ndansa avukat Stahl taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ok beceriksiz bir \u015fekilde sorguland\u0131. Bilirki\u015finin bilimsel yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan ya da vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131lardan \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131racak en ufak bir konu bile ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Savunman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten ustal\u0131kl\u0131 veya iyi haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f bir sorgu y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u00f6ylenemez. Avukat Stahl, Sa\u00df’\u0131n ve \u00f6\u011frencisi Habermeyer’in merkezi bilimsel prensipler geli\u015ftirdikleri ve hatta raporun da dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir paragrafla ilgili bir tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u201cHabermas’\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi paragraf\u0131\u201d okumam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyiverdi. Psikiyatr Sa\u00df’\u0131n hukuk\u00e7u Stahl’\u0131 kanun metninde belirtilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn verilme an\u0131 ile gibi hukuksal konularla ilgili bilgilendirmek zorunda kalmas\u0131, bu utan\u00e7 verici g\u00f6steriye son noktay\u0131 koydu.<\/p>\n
Sa\u00df’\u0131n sorgusuna \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta Sal\u0131 ve\/veya \u00c7ar\u015famba g\u00fcnleri devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131 nihayet bilirki\u015finin sorgusuna ba\u015flad\u0131 ve hemen eli aya\u011f\u0131na doland\u0131 Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda mahkeme Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcn vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu dilek\u00e7eyi reddetti. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatlar\u0131 Heer, Stahl ve Sturm bunun \u00fczerine -uzun bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme aras\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan- hakimlerin tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle reddedilmeleri i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in 2,5 saat daha ara verilmesini talep ettiler. Ancak sadece san\u0131klar\u0131n kendileri hakimleri […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1304"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1305,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304\/revisions\/1305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}