{"id":1311,"date":"2017-02-19T10:43:56","date_gmt":"2017-02-19T09:43:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1311"},"modified":"2017-02-19T10:43:56","modified_gmt":"2017-02-19T09:43:56","slug":"16-02-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/02\/19\/16-02-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"16.02.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 ideolojik tart\u0131\u015fmalara zorlamaya devam ediyor<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hamburglu Neonazi ve avukat J\u00fcrgen Rieger&#8217;in sahip oldu\u011fu arazide ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen &#8220;Hetendorf Oturum G\u00fcnleri&#8221;nin ideolojik karakteri ile ilgili bilgi vermesi istenen bir Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131yd\u0131. Polis raporlar\u0131na g\u00f6re Beate Zsch\u00e4pe 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu oturum haftalar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret etmi\u015f ve hatta bunu Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt olmadan yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Uzun s\u00fcredir Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairei&#8217;nde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmayan tan\u0131k hi\u00e7bir \u015fey hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan sorgusu bir sonu\u00e7 vermedi.<\/p>\n<p>Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 yine \u00e7e\u015fitli delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri vererek bunlarla Wohlleben&#8217;in &#8220;yabanc\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131&#8221; olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt&#8217;\u0131n \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 tav\u0131rlar\u0131ndan da haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamak istedi. Avukat Nahrath Wohlleben&#8217;in sorumlusu oldu\u011fu ve &#8220;etnik-\u00e7o\u011fulcu&#8221; ibarelerin bulundu\u011fu bir propaganda ilan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 al\u0131nt\u0131lar yapt\u0131.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme Wohlleben&#8217;in \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda \u015fu ana kadar hep \u00e7ok \u00e7ekimser davrand\u0131. Savunman\u0131n dilek\u00e7eleri mahkemeyi bu konuyla daha yak\u0131ndan ilgilenmeye zorlarsa bu m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131 memnun eder. Wohlleben&#8217;in temsilcisi oldu\u011fu &#8220;etnik-\u00e7o\u011fulculuk&#8221; ideolojisinin ulusalc\u0131-\u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 &#8220;halk&#8221; tan\u0131m\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak incelenmesi, burada \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n &#8220;\u0131rk&#8221; kelimesinin kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ama ayn\u0131 cani sonu\u00e7lara yol a\u00e7an modernize bir versiyonunun s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterecek. Bu tabir 1970&#8217;li y\u0131llarda &#8220;Yeni Sa\u011f&#8221; olarak tan\u0131mlanan ak\u0131m taraf\u0131ndan bir yandan klasik nasyonal sosyalist pozisyonlar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda d\u0131\u015flanmas\u0131n\u0131n bir sonucu di\u011fer yandan da nasyonal sosyalist bir Avrupa planlar\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131 olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 ideolojik tart\u0131\u015fmalara zorlamaya devam ediyor Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hamburglu Neonazi ve avukat J\u00fcrgen Rieger&#8217;in sahip oldu\u011fu arazide ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen &#8220;Hetendorf Oturum G\u00fcnleri&#8221;nin ideolojik karakteri ile ilgili bilgi vermesi istenen bir Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131yd\u0131. Polis raporlar\u0131na g\u00f6re Beate Zsch\u00e4pe 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu oturum haftalar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaret etmi\u015f ve hatta bunu Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1311"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1313,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311\/revisions\/1313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}