{"id":1319,"date":"2017-03-09T17:07:04","date_gmt":"2017-03-09T16:07:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1319"},"modified":"2017-03-09T17:07:04","modified_gmt":"2017-03-09T16:07:04","slug":"07-03-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/03\/09\/07-03-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"07.03.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Mahkeme bask\u0131 yap\u0131yor. Ve:\u00a0 Keupstra\u00dfe&#8217;deki \u201esald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131\u201cya y\u00f6nelik delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak belgeler incelendi: Konulardan biri Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine incelenen ve i\u00e7eri\u011finde etnik-\u00e7o\u011fulcu ifaler bar\u0131nd\u0131ran bir NPD bas\u0131n bildirisiydi. Daha \u00f6nemli olansa televizyon program\u0131 \u201ePembe Panter\u201cden al\u0131nma \u201ekliplerin\u201c bir listesi ve bu kliplerin nas\u0131l montajlanaca\u011f\u0131na dair ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir talimat\u0131n okunmas\u0131yd\u0131. T\u00fcm deliller burada s\u00f6z konusu olan\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin montajlanmalar\u0131 \u00fczerine bahse girilmesini teklif etti\u011fi klipler oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeydi ve bu da Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin NSU&#8217;nun su\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fcstlendi\u011fi videonun haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na dahil oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyordu.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Mahkeme bunun ard\u0131ndan bir kez daha delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini ve \u00f6nerileri -ve hatta hen\u00fcz a\u00e7\u0131kta olanlar\u0131 da- reddetti. Bu esnada bir yandan hangi gerek\u00e7eyle olursa olsun art\u0131k sonuca ula\u015fmak istedi\u011fini belli etti. Bu \u015fekilde \u00f6rne\u011fin Hamburg Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nden Hamburglu avukat ve Neonazi J\u00fcrgen Rieger&#8217;in d\u00fczenledi\u011fi \u201eHetendorf Toplant\u0131lar\u0131\u201c ile ilgili\u00a0 bilgi almay\u0131 reddetti. Ve bunu \u2013 Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt olmadan kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu- bu etkinli\u011fin verilecek kararda bir \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131yla gerek\u00e7elendirdi. Bu gerek\u00e7e, mahkemenin bir\u00e7ok duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnde bu toplant\u0131 haftas\u0131 ile ilgili delil toplamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131yd\u0131.\u00a0 Son olarak Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nden anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 bir sonu\u00e7 vermeyen bir tan\u0131k tam olarak da bu konuyla ilgili olarak sorgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Oysa ki Hamburglu meslekta\u015flar\u0131 konuya dair daha \u00e7ok \u015fey anlatabilirler (bkz. 16.02.2017).<\/p>\n<p>Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n son delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri de -ama anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir gerek\u00e7eyle- reddedildi. Mahkeme bunun ard\u0131ndan t\u00fcm kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lara verilecek di\u011fer delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri i\u00e7in \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fcne (14.03.2017) kadar s\u00fcre tan\u0131d\u0131. Verilen bu k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6zellikle de mahkemenin davay\u0131 pek de h\u0131zland\u0131rmadan s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131n\u0131rsa \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>San\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131 bunun ard\u0131ndan aralar\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 saatli\u011fine geri \u00e7ekildiler. Bunun ard\u0131ndan daha uzun s\u00fcre g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirttiler. Bu nedenle davaya yar\u0131n saat 13&#8217;te devam edilecek ve o zaman muhtemelen Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131ndan yeni bir tarafl\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle red dilek\u00e7esi geleck. Mahkemenin nas\u0131l bir yol izledi\u011fiyle ilgili daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir de\u011ferlendirmede yar\u0131n bulunaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n<p>Keupstra\u00dfe&#8217;den \u00e7ok say\u0131da m\u00fcdahil avukat bug\u00fcnden \u201esald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131\u201c, yani Keupstra\u00dfe sakinlerine y\u00f6nelik y\u0131llarca s\u00fcren soru\u015fturmalar ve -net bir \u015fekilde \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 bir motivasyona i\u015faret eden nesnel bir sald\u0131r\u0131 profiline ra\u011fmen-medyada yer alan \u015f\u00fcpheler ile ilgili bir delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi verdiler. Bu dilek\u00e7e \u015fu s\u00f6zlerle sonlan\u0131yor: \u201eBu \u201esald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131\u201cy\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren NSU de\u011fil devlettir.\u201c Almanca dilek\u00e7e metnini \u015fu linkte <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/2017.03.07-Antrag-Keupstr.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">bulabilirsiniz<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mahkeme bask\u0131 yap\u0131yor. Ve:\u00a0 Keupstra\u00dfe&#8217;deki \u201esald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131\u201cya y\u00f6nelik delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak belgeler incelendi: Konulardan biri Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine incelenen ve i\u00e7eri\u011finde etnik-\u00e7o\u011fulcu ifaler bar\u0131nd\u0131ran bir NPD bas\u0131n bildirisiydi. Daha \u00f6nemli olansa televizyon program\u0131 \u201ePembe Panter\u201cden al\u0131nma \u201ekliplerin\u201c bir listesi ve bu kliplerin nas\u0131l montajlanaca\u011f\u0131na dair ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir talimat\u0131n okunmas\u0131yd\u0131. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1319"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1320,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1319\/revisions\/1320"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}