Mahkeme bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n Paskalya tatili haftas\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleriyle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc dinledi. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi muhbiri Temme’nin alg\u0131s\u0131yla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmek \u00fczere Yozgat’\u0131n m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 planlanan bir bilirki\u015fi (bkz. 05.04.2017<\/a> tarihli blog) hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fuldu. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k m\u00fcdahil avukatlat\u0131n temelde kendi giri\u015fimleriyle birini \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rma yetkilerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tezini savundu, Yozgat’\u0131n m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131 buna ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir cevap verdi. Mahkeme bu konuya y\u00f6nelik tavr\u0131n\u0131 hen\u00fcz belli etmedi.<\/p>\n Mahkeme bunun ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n di\u011fer delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini reddetti, bunlar aras\u0131nda \u00f6zellikle de \u201csald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131\u201dda devletin sorumlulu\u011funa, yani NSU’nun K\u00f6ln’deki Keupstra\u00dfe’de ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fdurlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik soru\u015fturma ve \u015f\u00fcphelere (bkz. 07.03.2017<\/a> tarihli blog) dair dilek\u00e7eler vard\u0131. Maheme bu noktada ilgin\u00e7 bir \u015fekilde i\u00e7eriksel olarak dilek\u00e7eyi verenlerin tezine, yani \u201csald\u0131r\u0131dan sonraki sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n\u201d sorumlusunun NSU de\u011fil de devlet oldu\u011funa kat\u0131l\u0131yor gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyordu: \u201cFaillerin bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdiklerinde \u00e7e\u015fitli Alman devlet makamlar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen sahip olduklar\u0131 bilgilere ra\u011fmen soru\u015fturmalarda ve ifadelerinde bu bilgileri g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmay\u0131p kendi bildiklerine kar\u015f\u0131 gelerek sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n kurbanlar\u0131na daha da b\u00fcy\u00fck hasar vereceklerini varsaymam\u0131\u015flard\u0131. San\u0131k (h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck durumunda) b\u00f6ylesi bir s\u00fcreci hesaba katmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u201d Mahkeme bunun ard\u0131ndan di\u011fer delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri i\u00e7in 17.05.2017 tarihine kadar yeni bir m\u00fcddet verdi.<\/p>\n Zsch\u00e4pe’nin \u201ceski avukatlar\u0131\u201d Heer, Stahl ve Sturm, kendileri taraf\u0131ndan Prof. Sa\u00df’\u0131n iddia edilen kusurlar\u0131yla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmek \u00fczere \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan Prof. Faustmann’\u0131n yar\u0131n bilirki\u015fi olarak dinlenmesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdiler. Dilek\u00e7e ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015f olsa da daha \u00e7ok Sa\u00df’\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporunun bi\u00e7imsel nitelikleriyle ilgiliydi. Yani yar\u0131n Faustmann’\u0131n dinlenmesi Sa\u00df’\u0131n rahat\u0131n\u0131 pek bozmayacak.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cSan\u0131k (h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck durumunda) b\u00f6ylesi bir s\u00fcreci hesaba katmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u201d Mahkeme bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n Paskalya tatili haftas\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleriyle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc dinledi. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi muhbiri Temme’nin alg\u0131s\u0131yla ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmek \u00fczere Yozgat’\u0131n m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 planlanan bir bilirki\u015fi (bkz. 05.04.2017 tarihli blog) hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fuldu. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1340"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1341,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1340\/revisions\/1341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nReddedilen dilek\u00e7eler aras\u0131nda Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n Mich\u00e8le Kiesewetter’in \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Heilbronn’daki olay yerinin yak\u0131n\u0131nda s\u00f6zde \u201cFBI-ajanlar\u0131\u201d veya ba\u015fka ki\u015filerin bulundu\u011funa (bkz. 09.03.2017<\/a> tarihli blog) dair komplo teorisi dilek\u00e7eleri de reddedildi.<\/p>\n