{"id":1352,"date":"2017-05-25T17:50:59","date_gmt":"2017-05-25T15:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1352"},"modified":"2017-05-25T17:50:59","modified_gmt":"2017-05-25T15:50:59","slug":"17-05-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/05\/25\/17-05-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"17.05.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Son delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri<\/h4>\n<p>Mahkemenin delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerinin verilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi m\u00fcddet bug\u00fcn doldu ve ger\u00e7ekten de verilen birka\u00e7 dilek\u00e7e daha oldu.<\/p>\n<p>Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin avukat\u0131 Grasel, Beate Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin annesinin daha \u00f6nce vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadenin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi. Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin annesi mahkemede ifade vermeyi reddetmi\u015f ve polise vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadenin de\u011ferlendirilmesine de kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Polise verdi\u011fi ifadeye y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fimdi -bilirki\u015fi Bauer&#8217;in de annenin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgilere dayanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan- geri ald\u0131. Ancak mahkemede ifade vermeyi yeniden reddedip reddetmeyece\u011fi tam olarak bilinmedi\u011finden mahkeme onu \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta tan\u0131k olarak ifade vermek \u00fczere yeniden \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131. Ama kendisinin ifade vermeyece\u011fi ve eski ifadesinin dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 olas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00fck\u00fcyor; mahkeme bu nedenle onu o zamanlar sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan bir polis memurunu da \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer k\u0131sm\u0131, -avukat Sturm&#8217;un dedi\u011fine g\u00f6re- Prof. Faustmann&#8217;\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporunun Prof. Sa\u00df&#8217;\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporunun yetersiz oldu\u011funu ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin tehlikeli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ba\u015fka bir bilirki\u015fi raporunun \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dile\u00e7e verdi. Bu dilek\u00e7enn neden ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fcn anlatt\u0131k.<\/p>\n<p>M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar, Blood and Honour&#8217;\u0131n Pinokyo takma isimli eski Almanya ba\u015fkan\u0131 Stefan Lange&#8217;nin muhbir dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n davada incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdiler. Lange, mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde muhbir oldu\u011funu inkar etmi\u015fti. D\u00fcn \u00e7ok say\u0131da medya kurumu, Lange&#8217;nin uzun y\u0131llar boyunca Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nin muhbiri oldu\u011funu ve (eski) Blood &amp; Honour yap\u0131lar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u201cverimli\u201d bir \u015fekilde rapor vermi\u015f oldu\u011funu haber yapt\u0131. Blood &amp; Honour&#8217;daki \u00f6nemli konumu ve Jan Werner gibi do\u011frudan destek\u00e7ilerle olan yak\u0131n arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle Lange&#8217;nin de NSU&#8217;nun \u00e7ekirdeki \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcyle ilgili bilgiler vermi\u015f ve bunlar\u0131n Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131na iletilmemi\u015f oldu\u011fu akla yatk\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n<p>Wohlleben&#8217;in savunmas\u0131 Lange&#8217;nin ve ba\u015fka ki\u015filerin sorgulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdiler ancak bu dilek\u00e7e, Blood &amp; Honour Saksonya&#8217;n\u0131n sadece NSU&#8217;nun \u00e7ekirdeki \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn radikalle\u015fmesinden tek ba\u015f\u0131na sorumlu olmakla kalmay\u0131p cinayet silah\u0131 Ceska&#8217;y\u0131 da tedarik etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu tezine dayan\u0131yor. Savunma her iki tezle de mahkemede \u015fu ana kadar hakl\u0131 olarak sesini duyuramad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lgin\u00e7 olan k\u0131y\u0131da k\u00f6\u015fede kalan bir detayd\u0131: Avukat Nicole Schneiders dilek\u00e7elerden birinde NSU&#8217;nun Th\u00fcringen ve Saksonya&#8217;daki do\u011frudan \u00e7evresinden bir dizi muhbirin ismini sayd\u0131 ve bu s\u0131rada Th\u00fcringenli Ronny Artmann&#8217;\u0131n da ismini verdi. Artmann \u015fu ana kadar a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde muhbir muamelesi g\u00f6rmemi\u015fti. Artmann 1998 ile 2001 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma ve Jena&#8217;daki \u201cGen\u00e7 Nasyonal Demokratlar\u201dda faaldi ve o s\u0131rada o zamanlar Jena&#8217;da okumakta olan Schneiders ile de tan\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca san\u0131k Schultze&#8217;nin en g\u00fcvendi\u011fi arkada\u015flar\u0131ndan biriydi. Ama ancak 2014 \u015eubat&#8217;\u0131nda Federal Kriminal Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan sorgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve iddianamede NSU&#8217;nun ba\u011flant\u0131da oldu\u011fu ki\u015filer listesinde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7miyordu bile.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Son delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri Mahkemenin delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerinin verilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi m\u00fcddet bug\u00fcn doldu ve ger\u00e7ekten de verilen birka\u00e7 dilek\u00e7e daha oldu. Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin avukat\u0131 Grasel, Beate Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin annesinin daha \u00f6nce vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadenin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi. Zsch\u00e4pe&#8217;nin annesi mahkemede ifade vermeyi reddetmi\u015f ve polise vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadenin de\u011ferlendirilmesine de kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Polise verdi\u011fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1352"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1353,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions\/1353"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}