{"id":1399,"date":"2017-08-01T17:06:52","date_gmt":"2017-08-01T15:06:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1399"},"modified":"2017-08-01T17:06:52","modified_gmt":"2017-08-01T15:06:52","slug":"01-08-2017-presseerklarung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/08\/01\/01-08-2017-presseerklarung\/","title":{"rendered":"01.08.2017 Presseerkl\u00e4rung"},"content":{"rendered":"

M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fu ana kadarki m\u00fctalaas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131<\/b><\/h4>\n

Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131: Her ne pahas\u0131na olursa olsun \u201e\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c tezi<\/b><\/h4>\n

\u0130ftira atma ve yan\u0131ltmay\u0131 g\u00f6ze alarak NSU davas\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama imtiyaz\u0131 sorunu<\/b><\/h4>\n

Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k m\u00fctalaas\u0131yla NSU davas\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama imtiyaz\u0131n\u0131 geri kazanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uzun zaman \u00f6nce kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f \u201e\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c tezini ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klamakla kalmay\u0131p ayn\u0131 zamanda kendi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc payla\u015fmayan ve aralar\u0131nda meclis ara\u015ft\u0131rma komisyonu temsilcilerinin, gazetecilerin ve m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu ki\u015filere iftirada da bulundu. Dr. Diemer, onlar gibi NSU’nun tamamen izole bir \u201e\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201cden fazlas\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnenleri \u201eyan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131\u201c ve ilgili ifadeleriniyse \u201esinek v\u0131z\u0131lt\u0131s\u0131\u201c olarak tan\u0131mlad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Greger, kimi m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillerine olay yerlerinde \u201eyard\u0131m eden sa\u011fc\u0131lar\u0131n\u201c mevcut oldu\u011funa dair \u201es\u00f6z verdiklerini\u201c \u00f6ne s\u00fcrecek kadar ileri gitti. \u0130ddia etti\u011fine g\u00f6re ne Federal Kriminal Dairesinin soru\u015fturmalar\u0131, ne ara\u015ft\u0131rma komisyonlar\u0131 ne de 374 duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc buna y\u00f6nelik bir ipucunu ortaya \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu as\u0131ls\u0131z iddia kimi avukatlar\u0131n g\u00f6revlerini k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 varsay\u0131yor, m\u00fcvekkillerin kendi muhakeme g\u00fc\u00e7lerini inkar ediyor ve kamuoyunu yan\u0131lt\u0131yor. Bu sald\u0131r\u0131lar ayn\u0131 zamanda Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi delillerdeki zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n da bir ifadesi. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n elinde kalan tek \u015fey iddialarda bulunmak:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k ve Federal Kriminal Dairesinin \u00f6zellikle olay yerlerindeki di\u011fer destek\u00e7ileri ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in ellerinden gelen her \u015feyi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de\u011fil. Meclisin ikinci ara\u015ft\u0131rma komisyonu da a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde ifade etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00fczere bu konuda hemfikir. NSU davas\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 yetersiz soru\u015fturmalara dayanarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve bunlardan NSU’nun olay yerlerinde destek\u00e7ilerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sonucu \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Aksine Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00f6ylesi \u015f\u00fcphelileri gereken yo\u011funlukta bir \u00e7abayla aramad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kesinlik kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  • Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k bu nedenle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc -soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n olay yerlerinde destek\u00e7ilerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcyor- \u015fu ana kadar kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131. Aksine soru\u015fturma i\u00e7eriklerinin -e\u011fer bu y\u00f6nde soru\u015fturmalar mevcutsa- bilinmemesi i\u00e7in her \u015feyi yapt\u0131. M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n bu soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n dosyalar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rebilmek i\u00e7in verdikleri dilek\u00e7eler s\u00fcrekli reddedildi.<\/li>\n
  • M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesindeki esas duru\u015fmadaki vakalardan hi\u00e7 birinde olay yerlerindeki olas\u0131 destek\u00e7iler veya bilinmeyen ba\u015fka destek\u00e7ilerle ilgili delil toplanmad\u0131. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k aksine m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n olay yerlerindeki destek\u00e7ilere y\u00f6nelik somut ipu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verdikleri dilek\u00e7e ve sorduklar\u0131 sorular\u0131, bunlar\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle s\u00fcrekli reddetti.<\/li>\n
  • Ara\u015ft\u0131rma komisyonlar\u0131n\u0131n NSU’nun olas\u0131 di\u011fer destek\u00e7ileri veya \u00fcyelerini soru\u015fturmak i\u00e7in kendi soru\u015fturma yetkisi ve etkili imkanlar\u0131 yoktu.<\/li>\n
  • Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k da kendi soru\u015fturmalar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a eksiklikler g\u00f6r\u00fcyor. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Greger m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda \u00f6rne\u011fin NSU’da bulunan 20 silahtan sadece \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u00f6keninin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu itiraf etti.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    B\u00f6ylelikle NSU’nun olay yerlerini gizlice g\u00f6zetlerken yard\u0131m almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n kan\u0131tlanmam\u0131\u015f bir iddias\u0131 olmaktan \u00f6teye gitmiyor. Bu mant\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6re en az 17 ba\u015fka silah, patlay\u0131c\u0131 ve cephane hi\u00e7bir bilgisi olmayan ki\u015filerden gelmi\u015f olmal\u0131yd\u0131. \u201eD\u00f6ner-Killer\u201c (D\u00f6ner Katili) isimli \u015fark\u0131 NSU’nun ilgisi olmadan ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f ve sa\u011fc\u0131 dergilere yollanan ve NSU mektubu denen mektubu al\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131ndan hi\u00e7biri anlamam\u0131\u015f olmal\u0131yd\u0131 vs.<\/p>\n

    Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n aksini g\u00f6steren \u00e7ok say\u0131daki ipucu ve cevaplanmam\u0131\u015f sorulara ra\u011fmen izole \u201e\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c tezine \u00e7aresizce ba\u011fl\u0131 kalmas\u0131 temelde iki merkezi motifle a\u00e7\u0131klanabilir:<\/p>\n

    Bilin\u00e7li destek\u00e7i a\u011f\u0131 ne kadar b\u00fcy\u00fckse devlet makamlar\u0131n\u0131n NSU \u00e7evresindeki \u00e7ok say\u0131daki muhbir arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bu a\u011f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve eylemlerinden haberdar olma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da o kadar b\u00fcy\u00fck. \u0130zole \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc tezi ayr\u0131ca Almanya’daki militan Nazi yap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n boyutunu da gizliyor. Emniyet makamlar\u0131 b\u00f6ylece NSU’nun 13 y\u0131ll\u0131k varolu\u015funa imkan veren davran\u0131\u015f \u015femas\u0131n\u0131 tekrarl\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

    Dr. Diemer’in, izole \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc tezini sorgulaman\u0131n NSU ter\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6lenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131 ve kamuoyunu tedirgin edece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki tezi ger\u00e7ekleri sapt\u0131r\u0131yor. Cinayet ve bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 kurbanlar\u0131n\u0131n ailelerinin tedirginli\u011fi ger\u00e7ekten de b\u00fcy\u00fck, ama bunun sebebi Neonazi yap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n boyutu, devletin bildikleri ve kendi g\u00fcvenlikleriyle ilgili halen belirsizlikler olmas\u0131. Tam da bu konu Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu alt\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Kamuoyunu m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n m\u00fctalaalar\u0131n\u0131 bizzat dinlemeye, olanlar\u0131 kendi g\u00f6zleriyle g\u00f6rmeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz. Bu m\u00fctalaada Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n aksine NSU’nun organize bir sa\u011f camian\u0131n i\u00e7erisine ideolojik ve yap\u0131sal yerle\u015fimi, devletin ortak kusuru, i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n ma\u011fdurlar \u00fczerindeki etkileri ve senelerden bu yana s\u00fcregelen yap\u0131sal \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 soru\u015fturmalar s\u00f6z konusu edilecek. M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda NSU taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclen ki\u015filerden alt\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n dava s\u00fcrecinde tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmemi\u015f aileleri de ilk kez kendileri veya avukatlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini belirtme imkan\u0131na sahip olacaklar.<\/p>\n

    <\/h5>\n
    Avukatlar<\/h5>\n
    Seda Ba\u015fay-Yildiz<\/h5>\n
    Antonia von der Behrens<\/h5>\n
    Dr. Mehmet Daimag\u00fcler<\/h5>\n
    Dr. Bj\u00f6rn Elberling<\/h5>\n
    Berthold Fresenius<\/h5>\n
    Alexander Hoffmann<\/h5>\n
    Carsten Ilius<\/h5>\n
    Stephan Kuhn<\/h5>\n
    Sebastian Scharmer<\/h5>\n
    Dr. Peer Stolle<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fu ana kadarki m\u00fctalaas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131: Her ne pahas\u0131na olursa olsun \u201e\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c tezi \u0130ftira atma ve yan\u0131ltmay\u0131 g\u00f6ze alarak NSU davas\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama imtiyaz\u0131 sorunu Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k m\u00fctalaas\u0131yla NSU davas\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama imtiyaz\u0131n\u0131 geri kazanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uzun zaman \u00f6nce kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f \u201e\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c tezini ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klamakla kalmay\u0131p ayn\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1400,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399\/revisions\/1400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}