{"id":1480,"date":"2017-12-15T18:29:15","date_gmt":"2017-12-15T17:29:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1480"},"modified":"2017-12-15T18:29:15","modified_gmt":"2017-12-15T17:29:15","slug":"14-12-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/12\/15\/14-12-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"14.12.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 \u00f6zellikle Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve\u00a0 Andr\u00e9 ve Susan Eminger ile ilgiliydi<\/h4>\n

Bug\u00fcn avukat Eberhard Reinecke, Keupstra\u00dfe’deki \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131yla ilgili olarak meslekta\u015f\u0131 Sch\u00f6n’\u00fcn d\u00fcn ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu m\u00fctalaalar\u0131na<\/a> devam etti. Reinecke, san\u0131k Wohlleben’in ba\u015fa\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131ndan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 bug\u00fcn maalesef tamamlayamad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Reinecke \u00f6ncelikle NSU’nun destek\u00e7ilerine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan davalar\u0131 ele alarak bunlardan bir sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kmayaca\u011f\u0131na dair duydu\u011fu endi\u015feyi dile getirdi. \u00d6zellikle de Nazi \u00e7evrelerinden \u00e7ok say\u0131da yalanc\u0131 \u015fahitten bahsederek bu ifadelerin somut \u015fekilde yalan olduklar\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlaman\u0131n neden kolay oldu\u011funu \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u00f6rnek arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6sterdi. Eberhard Reinecke, kendinden \u00f6nce Edith Lunnebach’\u0131n<\/a> yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu gibi mahkeme heyetine \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak, onlardan \u201crahatlar\u0131n\u0131 bozmalar\u0131n\u0131\u201d ve a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015f her \u015feyi verecekleri kararda belirtmelerini istedi.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Eberhard Reinecke bunun ard\u0131ndan \u201ck\u0131smi susma hakk\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fin eksikli\u011fi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin ifade verme \u015feklini ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015feklide ele ald\u0131. Bir yandan sorular\u0131n sadece yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yan\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n sorular\u0131n\u0131nsa hi\u00e7 yan\u0131tlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu ifadenin hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan neden \u00e7ok az de\u011feri oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Di\u011fer yandansa yine \u00e7ok net \u00f6rnekler dayanarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatla\u0131 Borchert ve Grasel taraf\u0131ndan okunan bu a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da do\u011fruluktan uzak, inan\u0131lmaz, kendi i\u00e7erisinde \u00e7eli\u015fkili ve do\u011frulu\u011funun deliller arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla denetlenebildi\u011fi yerlerde \u00e7ok kez \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011funu ortaya koydu.<\/p>\n

Anlaml\u0131 olan, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatlar\u0131 Heer ve Stahl’\u0131 hareket ge\u00e7irenin yine, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi de\u011fil de Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6neltilen bir ele\u015ftiri olmas\u0131yd\u0131: Reinecke NSU’nun gazete haberleri ar\u015fivinin delil de\u011ferlendirmesinde, ba\u015fka destek\u00e7ilerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik soru\u015fturmalar konusundaki yakla\u015f\u0131mlarla ilgili d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f bir nota dair \u00e7ok say\u0131da ipucu bulmu\u015ftu. Ancak bu notun kendisi dosyalar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir yerinde yoktu, konunun \u00fczerine gidilmi\u015f oldu\u011funa dair pek bir i\u015faret de yoktu. Oysa ki ar\u015fivde M\u00fcnihteki cinayetlerle ilgili olarak M\u00fcnihli bir gazetenin hem yerel hem de \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131ndaki bask\u0131s\u0131ndan makalelerin bulunmas\u0131, M\u00fcnih’te bu gazeteyi sat\u0131n alm\u0131\u015f olan bir destek\u00e7inin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret ediyordu.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fka bir vakada yazar\u0131 bilinen ama tarihi bilinmeyen bir makale vard\u0131. Federal Kriminal Dairesi’nin soru\u015fturmalar\u0131, tarihi bulman\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle sonland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Reinecke buna kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131: Sadece kendisinin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu gibi yazar\u0131 telefonla aramak gerekiyordu, o zaman hemen bir cevap al\u0131nabilirdi. O noktada Heer ve Stahl, bunun resmi bile olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131k protestolar\u0131nda bulundular, halbuki mahkeme soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n kapsam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirilerin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu defalarca belirtmi\u015fti. Reinecke de bu itiraza net s\u00f6zlerle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verdi:<\/p>\n

\u201eBurada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z, kendi taraf\u0131n\u0131za ihanetin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc e\u011fer mahkemenin verece\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmde resmi olmayan bir \u015feyi de\u011ferlendirmesini ba\u015farsayd\u0131m, o durumda temyiziniz konusunda ge\u00e7en y\u0131llarda vermi\u015f oldu\u011funuz aptalca reddi hakim dilek\u00e7eleriyle elde etti\u011finizden \u00e7ok daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 elde etmi\u015f olurdunuz.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u201captalca\u201d kelimesi nedeniyle Reinecke’yi sessizli\u011fe \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rsa da kendisinin de e\u011flenmi\u015f oldu\u011funu pek gizleyemedi. Ve bunun\u00a0 \u00fczerine mahkeme ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak gerek\u00e7elendirdi\u011fi bir kararla Reinecke’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n neden tabii ki ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu bir kez daha ortaya koydu.<\/p>\n

Eberhard Reinecke bunun ard\u0131ndan Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zellikle de en yak\u0131n s\u0131rda\u015flar\u0131 Andr\u00e9 ve Susam Eminger’i korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerlerde inan\u0131lmaz oldu\u011funu tek tek ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Eberhard Reinecke m\u00fctalaas\u0131na \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta devam edecek. Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn sonlar\u0131na do\u011fru avukat Kaplan’\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131 da k\u0131saca \u201caraya sokuldu\u201d. Kaplan Keupstra\u00dfe ma\u011fdurlar\u0131ndan birini temsil ediyor. Kaplan, san\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131klar\u0131 su\u00e7lardan su\u00e7lu olduklar\u0131 tespitinde bulundu ve onun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda sadece kurumsal \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesinin rol\u00fc sorular\u0131n\u0131n cevaplanmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ama bunun yerinin bir ceza davas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Ama bunu yaparken\u00a0 neden bu sorular\u0131n yerinin tam da M\u00fcnih’teki dava oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik bizim ve di\u011ferlerinin sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fu arg\u00fcmanlara de\u011finmedi.<\/p>\n

Heer ve Stahl savunman\u0131n beklenene g\u00f6re Ocak ay\u0131 ortas\u0131nda ba\u015flayacak olan m\u00fctalaalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak, her ihtimalde Zsch\u00e4pe’nin yeni avukatlar\u0131 Borchert ve Grasel’in ard\u0131ndan m\u00fctalaada bulunmak istediklerini ve onlar\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u201cuzunca bir araya\u201d ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirttiler. Savunman\u0131n iki yar\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaalar\u0131nda birbirlerine y\u00f6nelik nas\u0131l bir tav\u0131r i\u00e7inde olacaklar\u0131 merak konusu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 \u00f6zellikle Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve\u00a0 Andr\u00e9 ve Susan Eminger ile ilgiliydi Bug\u00fcn avukat Eberhard Reinecke, Keupstra\u00dfe’deki \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131yla ilgili olarak meslekta\u015f\u0131 Sch\u00f6n’\u00fcn d\u00fcn ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu m\u00fctalaalar\u0131na devam etti. Reinecke, san\u0131k Wohlleben’in ba\u015fa\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131ndan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 bug\u00fcn maalesef tamamlayamad\u0131. Reinecke \u00f6ncelikle NSU’nun destek\u00e7ilerine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan davalar\u0131 ele alarak bunlardan bir sonu\u00e7 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1480"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1481,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480\/revisions\/1481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}