{"id":1485,"date":"2017-12-19T23:12:07","date_gmt":"2017-12-19T22:12:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=1485"},"modified":"2017-12-23T12:15:20","modified_gmt":"2017-12-23T11:15:20","slug":"19-12-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2017\/12\/19\/19-12-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"19.12.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

Avukat Reinecke’nin m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n konular\u0131 aras\u0131nda NSU’nun ileti\u015fim stratejisi de vard\u0131<\/h4>\n

Avukat Eberhard Reinecke bug\u00fcn m\u00fctalaas\u0131na devam etti. \u0130lk olarak k\u0131saca avukat Kaplan’\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz hafta yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalara<\/a>\u00a0kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vererek kurumsal \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131kla ilgili sorular\u0131n yerinin neden M\u00fcnih’teki dava oldu\u011funu ve \u201eba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z yarg\u0131 organ\u0131\u201c olarak rollerini s\u00fcrekli vurgulayan ki\u015filerin neden \u201ehi\u00e7bir i\u015f yapmayan yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131na\u201c d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcverdiklerini bir kez daha detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Reinecke laf aras\u0131nda S\u00fcleyman Ta\u015fk\u00f6pr\u00fc’n\u00fcn k\u0131zkarde\u015finin mahkemeye yazm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu mektuptan da s\u00f6z etti. Ta\u015fk\u00f6pr\u00fc’n\u00fcn k\u0131zkarde\u015fi ge\u00e7en haftaki<\/a>\u00a0tuhaf ve geri g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fl\u00fc m\u00fctaalaas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan avukat Wierig taraf\u0131ndan temsil edilmek istemedi\u011fini, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bunun kendi yarar\u0131na olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendini Wierig taraf\u0131ndan aldat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hissetti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti. Wierig bug\u00fcn -m\u00fcvekkilinin net \u015fekilde belirtti\u011fi iste\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 gelerek- M\u00fcnih’e gelmi\u015fti. Reinecke’nin bu mektubu konu etmesi yine Zsch\u00e4pe’nin \u201eeski avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n\u201c -yine m\u00fcvekkillerinin olas\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fekilde- \u00f6fkeli m\u00fcdahalelerde bulunmalar\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n

Eberhard Reinecke bunu ard\u0131ndan NSU’nun ileti\u015fim stratejisine e\u011filerek Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n, NSU’nun i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fcstlenmemi\u015f olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 soru\u015fturma yetkililerinin do\u011fru y\u00f6nde soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fctmemi\u015f olmamalar\u0131n\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r oldu\u011fu tezini ele\u015ftirdi. Reinecke \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn 2002 y\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015flar\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli Nazi \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine yollam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve NSU mektubu ad\u0131 verilen mektup ile ayn\u0131 d\u00f6neme ait olan ve\u00a0 o ana kadar i\u015flenmi\u015f su\u00e7lar\u0131n konu edildi\u011fi 2. itiraf videsu aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131ya i\u015faret etti. Reinecke’nin tezi \u015fuydu: NSU mektubu yay\u0131nlanmak \u00fczere haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya yol a\u00e7mas\u0131 gerekiyordu ve bu tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00fczerine de video yay\u0131nlanacakt\u0131. F\u0131rt\u0131na Birlikleri’nin (180 derece d\u00f6nd\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f) sembol\u00fcyle b\u00fcy\u00fck benzerlikler ta\u015f\u0131yan bir NSU logosunun tasarlanmas\u0131 da bu tezi destekliyordu. Ancak bu tart\u0131\u015fma meydana gelmemi\u015fti, bu ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k da 2001 A\u011fustos ay\u0131ndaki Habil K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 cinayeti ile 2004 \u015eubat ay\u0131ndaki Mehmet Turgut cinayetleri aras\u0131ndaki neredeyse 2,5 senelik aray\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n

Pembe Panter videosunda dikkat \u00e7ekici olan ise videonun 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 Kas\u0131m ay\u0131nda \u00e7oktan \u201cbitirilmi\u015f\u201d olmas\u0131yd\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca \u201cvideonun sonundaki ‘Bug\u00fcn son de\u011fildi, \u015f\u00fcphesiz tekrar gelece\u011fiz’ [\u2026] muhakkak ‘Bunu izledi\u011finizde \u00e7oktan \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131z’dan farkl\u0131yd\u0131.\u201c Videonun planlanan di\u011fer su\u00e7larla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir\u00e7ok i\u015faret vard\u0131. S\u00f6z konusu olan muhtemelen NSU’nun evinde g\u00fcncel bir haritas\u0131\u00a0 bulunan Berlin Yahudi Hastanesi’ne yap\u0131lacak bir sald\u0131r\u0131yd\u0131:<\/p>\n

\u201e\u0130ki Uwe’nin 4.11.2011’de kendilerini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeleri sonucunda daha b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6nlenmi\u015f ve san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe bu ba\u011flamda halihaz\u0131rda planlanm\u0131\u015f olan\u00a0 itiraf videosunun g\u00f6nderimini daha b\u00fcy\u00fck bir plan\u0131n par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f olabilirdi.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

T\u00fcm bunlar kan\u0131tlanam\u0131yor, bunun i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma g\u00f6revlilerinin en az\u0131ndan 2011 sonras\u0131nda makul bir \u015fekilde soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olmalar\u0131 gerekirdi. Ancak Reinecke’nin m\u00fctalaas\u0131, NSU’nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fcyeleri s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda bile daha ne kadar \u00e7ok sorunun cveaps\u0131z kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu. Bu sorular\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funa san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe cevap verebilece\u011finden, Reinecke m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 mahkemeye \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak noktalad\u0131 ve \u015funu talep etti:<\/p>\n

\u201e [\u2026] Bayan Zsch\u00e4pe i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lara gerekli mesafeyi kazanmazsa uzak bir gelecekteki serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lma olana\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in elveri\u015fli bir sosyal \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcde bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve bu mesafenin nihayetinde sadece NSU ve eylemleri hakk\u0131nda bildiklerini ger\u00e7ekten a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 durumunda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclebilece\u011finin verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmde belirtilmesi.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

Sch\u00f6n ve Reinecke’nin m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 bloglar\u0131nda Almanca olarak yay\u0131nland\u0131. Reinhard Sch\u00f6n’\u00fcn 16.12.2017 tarihli m\u00fctaalas\u0131yla ba\u015flayarak [link: http:\/\/www.blog-rechtsanwael.de\/zum-bombenanschlag-in-der-keupstr\/] metinlerin tamam\u0131n\u0131 okuman\u0131z\u0131 tavsiye ederiz.<\/p>\n

Bug\u00fcn ba\u015fka bir m\u00fctalaaya s\u0131ra gelmedi: Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bir karara itiraz edeceklerini s\u00f6yledi ve bunun i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 saat talep etti, san\u0131k Eminer migreninden, \u00e7ok say\u0131da savunma avukat\u0131 da hastal\u0131klar\u0131ndan \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldular. Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc bu nedenle 13’\u00fc az ge\u00e7erek sona erdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Avukat Reinecke’nin m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n konular\u0131 aras\u0131nda NSU’nun ileti\u015fim stratejisi de vard\u0131 Avukat Eberhard Reinecke bug\u00fcn m\u00fctalaas\u0131na devam etti. \u0130lk olarak k\u0131saca avukat Kaplan’\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz hafta yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalara\u00a0kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vererek kurumsal \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131kla ilgili sorular\u0131n yerinin neden M\u00fcnih’teki dava oldu\u011funu ve \u201eba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z yarg\u0131 organ\u0131\u201c olarak rollerini s\u00fcrekli vurgulayan ki\u015filerin neden \u201ehi\u00e7bir i\u015f yapmayan yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131na\u201c d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcverdiklerini bir kez daha […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1485"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1485\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1486,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1485\/revisions\/1486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}