Bu sabah ilk olarak Eminger’in avukat\u0131 Sprafke’nin kendisnin \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bir tan\u0131k sorguland\u0131. Bu tan\u0131k 4.11.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah\u0131 Eminger ile birlikte Chemnitz’deki bir restoranda kahvalt\u0131 etmi\u015f oldu\u011funu anlatacakt\u0131. Bu \u015fekilde Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n baz istasyonu verilerine dayanan ve Eminger’in o esnada Zsch\u00e4pe ile birlikte iki Uwe’nin kald\u0131klar\u0131 yer ile ilgili ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren deliller \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecekti. Bas\u0131n\u0131n yer yer iddia etti\u011fi \u00fczere Eminger’in nerede oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik \u201cyalan \u015fahitlik\u201d de yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Eminger’in 4.11.2011’deki eylemi su\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir eylem de\u011fil, sadece kasten desteklemi\u015f oldu\u011fu eylemlere y\u00f6nelik \u00e7ok say\u0131daki ipucundan biriydi. Ama savunman\u0131n bu plan\u0131 gr\u00e7ekle\u015femedi, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu ipucunun bile aksi ispatlanamad\u0131: Tan\u0131k iddia edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde hat\u0131rlam\u0131yordu. \u00dcstelik 4.11.2011 tarihinin Sprafke’nin bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7a\u011f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu dilek\u00e7ede belirtti\u011fi \u00fczere, Chemnitz’de ya\u015fayanlar i\u00e7in \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir g\u00fcn olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde.<\/p>\n
Sprafke ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7eler haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in uzunca bir ara verilmesini de talep edince Federal Savc\u0131 Dr. Diemer buna sert \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak Eminger’e y\u00f6nelik davan\u0131n esas duru\u015fmadan ayr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti. Ona g\u00f6re Eminger’in yeni avukat\u0131n\u0131n sadece davan\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcncemeye u\u011framas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in orada oldu\u011fu belliydi. Mahkeme dilek\u00e7eyle ilgili hemen karar vermek yerine \u00f6ncelikle di\u011fer dilek\u00e7eleri de beklemek istedi\u011finden karar\u0131 erteledi. Sprafke’nin heyetin karar vermemi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcvekkiliyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek i\u00e7in yar\u0131na kadar ara verilmesi talebi de reddedildi.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6ylece saat 13’e do\u011fru nihayet Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Borchert’in m\u00fctalaas\u0131 ba\u015flad\u0131. Borchert, kendisinin delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle ilgilenece\u011fini, hukuki de\u011ferlendirmeyiyse meslekta\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcstlenece\u011fini belirtti. Borchert’in deliller hakk\u0131nda Grasel’den de az bilgisi oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcrse \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 bir g\u00f6rev da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 bu. Borchert ilk olarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda kendisinin form\u00fcle etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201edelil de\u011ferlendirmesi\u201c ile \u201eilgilenmesinin\u201c, m\u00fcvekkilinin aleyhine olan delil ve ipu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 tamamen g\u00f6rmezden gelen i\u00e7i bo\u015f ama bir o kadar a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde ifade edilen sald\u0131r\u0131lardan ileriye gidememesi bu nedenle \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fildi.<\/p>\n
Bunu burada sadece bir \u00f6rnekle ortaya koyaca\u011f\u0131z: Borchert m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131nda Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n NSU’nun \u00fcstlenmedi\u011fi cinayet ve patlay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131larla T\u00fcrk k\u00f6kenli insanlar\u0131n g\u00fcven duygusunu sarsma ve sonunda Almanya’y\u0131 terk etmelerini sa\u011flama plan\u0131na y\u00f6nelik vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgileri \u015fu \u201earg\u00fcmanlarla\u201c \u201e\u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u201c: Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k bu plan\u0131n nas\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fcyece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 2000 ve 2007 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda cinayetler y\u00fcz\u00fcnden Almanya’y\u0131 terketmi\u015f veya Almanya’ya gelmemi\u015f olan hi\u00e7 bir T\u00fcrk esnaf yoktu, en az\u0131ndan delillere g\u00f6re bu b\u00f6yleydi.\u00a0 Ayr\u0131ca sald\u0131r\u0131larla g\u00fcven duygusunu sarsma hedefi, kurbanlar cinayeti i\u015fleyenlerin kim oldu\u011funu bilmediklerinden anlams\u0131zd\u0131. Kimsenin \u00fcstlenmedi\u011fi sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n o zamanlar Neonazi \u00e7evrelerinde \u00e7ok tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan bir strateji oldu\u011fu, ilgili belgelerin NSU’nun \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7ekirdek \u00fcyesinde de bulunmu\u015f oldu\u011fu, Zsch\u00e4pee’nin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na yard\u0131m etti\u011fi ve yayd\u0131\u011f\u0131 NSU videosunun tam da bu stratejiyi yans\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6\u00e7men kom\u00fcnitelerin olaylar sonucunda g\u00fcvensizli\u011fie kap\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok say\u0131da dava tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan anlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 \u2013 hepsi bo\u015f s\u00f6zlerdi: Avukat Borchert bunu tahayy\u00fcl edemiyordu, ne de olsa g\u00fcvensizi\u011fe kap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f T\u00fcrk k\u00f6kenli insanlardan hi\u00e7biri kendisine ba\u015fvurmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan s\u00f6ylenecek daha fazla bir \u015fey yok.<\/p>\n
Borchert ayn\u0131 oranda sofistike ve dik ba\u015fl\u0131 s\u00f6zde-arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n geri kalan delil de\u011ferlendirmesiyle ilgili olarak da \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Delillerin ger\u00e7ek sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 da bu esnada hemen hemen tamamen g\u00f6rmezden geldi. Borchert s\u00fcrekli bununla gerekli olan her \u015fey s\u00f6yleniyormu\u015f\u00e7as\u0131na Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kendisinin haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndan b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri okudu. Akl\u0131na bir \u201ekar\u015f\u0131 arg\u00fcman\u201c bile gelmedi\u011fi durumlarda Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n \u201e\u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeye ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201c tespitine yasland\u0131.<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z performans\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe’nin \u201ceski avukatlar\u0131\u201dn\u0131n da pek ho\u015flar\u0131na gitmemi\u015f oldu\u011fu y\u00fcz ifadelerinden ve s\u0131k s\u0131k bak\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131ndan belli old\u0131.<\/p>\n
Duru\u015fma ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc 16 sular\u0131nda sona erdi. Borchert’in m\u00fctalaas\u0131na yar\u0131n devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131 nihayet ba\u015flad\u0131. M\u00fctalaa korkuldu\u011fundan da abs\u00fcrd. Bu sabah ilk olarak Eminger’in avukat\u0131 Sprafke’nin kendisnin \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bir tan\u0131k sorguland\u0131. Bu tan\u0131k 4.11.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah\u0131 Eminger ile birlikte Chemnitz’deki bir restoranda kahvalt\u0131 etmi\u015f oldu\u011funu anlatacakt\u0131. Bu \u015fekilde Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n baz istasyonu verilerine dayanan ve Eminger’in o esnada Zsch\u00e4pe ile birlikte iki Uwe’nin kald\u0131klar\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1548"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1549,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1548\/revisions\/1549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}