Bug\u00fcn Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaada bulunmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce, hen\u00fcz Nisan ay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda ek avukat olarak g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olan Sprafke bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Andr\u00e9 Eminger’in avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu. \u201eAvukat ve m\u00fcvekkili aras\u0131nda savunmaya nas\u0131l devam edilece\u011fi konusundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131\u201c g\u00f6revinin son bulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015fti. Karlsruheli avukat\u0131n genel olarak olduk\u00e7a talihsiz performans\u0131 b\u00f6ylece tarih oldu, davada daha fazla gecikme olmas\u0131 art\u0131k beklenmiyor.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k Eminger’in di\u011fer avukatlar\u0131 Kaiser ve Hedrich ise d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcml\u00fc olarak ortak m\u00fctalaalar\u0131n\u0131 sundular. Sonu\u00e7 olarak m\u00fcvekkillerinin tamamen beraat ettirilmesini talep ettiler. Eminger \u015f\u00fcphesiz inan\u00e7l\u0131 bir Nasyonal Sosyalistti ama cezay\u0131 gerektiren bir su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi kan\u0131tlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130ki avukat\u0131n delillerin durumuna y\u00f6nelik bu de\u011ferlendirmelerinde b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda yaln\u0131z olduklar\u0131n\u0131 bilmeleri gerekiyor. Mahkeme ne de olsa Eminger’i ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz sonbaharda sadece silahl\u0131 soyguna yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k de\u011fil K\u00f6ln’de Probsteigasse’deki bakkala bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi cinayet te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc nedeniyle a\u011f\u0131r su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesiyle g\u00f6z alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Savunma ilk olarak Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 ve mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde \u00f6zetledi ve ard\u0131ndan hi\u00e7biri inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olmayan kar\u015f\u0131 arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 sundu:<\/p>\n
Eminger’in destek eylemleri, \u00f6rne\u011fin Bahncard’\u0131 temin etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 somut bir su\u00e7 i\u00e7in zorlay\u0131c\u0131 bir gereklilik ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yordu. Savunma bu \u015fekilde B\u00f6hnhardt, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos’un gizli hayatlar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcndeki mobilitenin Bahncard ile kolayla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 da bunun su\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015flenmeleri ve planlanmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli bir ko\u015ful olmas\u0131n\u0131 da yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n
Avukatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re Eminger’in kendi belgelerini kullanarak kiralam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n iki soygun sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 ve K\u00f6ln’deki bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ispatlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Oysa ki karavanlar\u0131n B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos’un ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi soygunlarla yak\u0131ndan ili\u015fkili olarak sistemli \u015fekilde kiralanm\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131, do\u011fal olarak Eminger’in kiralam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu karavanlar\u0131n da bahsi ge\u00e7en su\u00e7 eylemlerinde kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu sonucunu destekliyordu. B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos ba\u015fka bir ara\u00e7la olay yerlerine giderken kiralanm\u0131\u015f ara\u00e7larla tatil \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 -Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n aksine- akla yatk\u0131n de\u011fildi.<\/p>\n
Savunma K\u00f6ln’deki bomba yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015f oldu\u011funda karavan\u0131n \u00e7oktan kiralanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu yere teslim edilmi\u015f oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Savunman\u0131n bu iddias\u0131 ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n bomban\u0131n yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi g\u00fcn ile ilgili vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 net olmayan bilgilere dayan\u0131yor. Esas duru\u015fmada da bomban\u0131n yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00fcn tam olarak tespit edilememi\u015fti. Bu nedenle bu tam olarak net olmayan bilgiler Eminger’in yard\u0131mda bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131na ters d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fcyordu. Ayr\u0131ca Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos’un kendisine bomban\u0131n imali, K\u00f6ln’e g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ve d\u00fckkana yerle\u015ftirilmesinden bahsetmi\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda belirtmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan her \u015fey ikilinin bomban\u0131n K\u00f6ln’e ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Eminger’in kiralam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu arac\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyordu.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olan destek eylemleri ise (\u00f6rne\u011fin Eminger’in Zwickau polisine bir su hasar\u0131 sonras\u0131 verdi\u011fi tan\u0131k ifadesinde Zsch\u00e4pe’yi kar\u0131s\u0131 olarak g\u00f6stermesi) ancak son cinayet sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 sonras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015flerdi, ama o zaman NSU art\u0131k sadece soygun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011finden art\u0131k ter\u00f6rist bir \u00f6rg\u00fct de\u011fildi. Savunman\u0131n RAF’\u0131n feshinin ard\u0131ndan bug\u00fcn hala yer alt\u0131nda ya\u015fayan ve soygun i\u015fleyen s\u00f6zde RAF \u00fcyeleriyle ak\u0131l almaz bir paralellik g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak ter\u00f6rist \u00f6rg\u00fct NSU’nun 2007 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki \u201efeshi\u201cni \u00f6ne s\u00fcrmesi, bir iddiadan fazlas\u0131 de\u011fil ve Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi da\u011f\u0131tm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu itiraf videosuyla da \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Eminger’in bilgilsayar\u0131nda Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n NSU’nun \u201emavi kopyas\u0131\u201c olarak tan\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201eTurner G\u00fcnl\u00fckleri\u201cnin bir kopyas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu savunmaya g\u00f6re do\u011fruydu , ama as\u0131l mavi kopya Combat 18 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u201eField Manual\u201c\u0131yd\u0131 ve o bilgisayarda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Savunma neden i\u00e7erik olarak birbirine \u00e7ok benzeyen kitaplardan birinin de\u011fil de di\u011ferinin NSU’ya model olu\u015fturdu\u011funa dair bir arg\u00fcman sunmad\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca san\u0131k Eminger, \u00f6zellikle kendisi ve kard\u015feinin \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201eThe Aryan Law and Order\u201c fanzininde Alman olmayanlara kar\u015f\u0131 silahl\u0131 m\u00fccadeleyi o kadar a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde savunuyordu ki NSU’nun cinayetlerini destekleme kast\u0131 ve e\u011filiminden \u015f\u00fcphe duyulmuyordu.<\/p>\n
Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131 ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz sonbaharda verilen tutuklama karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik halihaz\u0131rdaki arg\u00fcmanlardan daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 getirmedi. Yani mahkemenin, verece\u011fi kararda tutuklama karar\u0131ndakinden farkl\u0131 bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaymak i\u00e7in bir neden yok.<\/p>\n
Ancak Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz be\u015f sene i\u00e7erisinde neyi yapmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k kazand\u0131. Andr\u00e9 Eminger de\u011fil de yine militan bir Nazi olan ve o zamanlar olay yerinde ya\u015fayan karde\u015fi Maik’in ara\u00e7lar\u0131 Andr\u00e9’nin belgeleri ile kiralam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu m\u00fctalaada ilk kez g\u00fcndeme getirildi. Maik Eminger 29.07.2014 tarihindeki sorgusunda ifade vermeyi kendini su\u00e7lu \u00e7\u0131karabilece\u011finden de\u011fil de karde\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 ifade vermek zorunda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddetmi\u015fti. Ne bir tan\u0131k ne de Andr\u00e9 Eminger’in kendisi, karde\u015fi Maik’in Andr\u00e9 Eminger’in belgelerini kullanm\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini asla iddia etmemi\u015fti. Ayr\u0131ca deliller de Maik Eminger’in NSU’nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcyle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik bir ipucu ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yordu. Mahkemenin bu nedenle bu olas\u0131l\u0131k hipoteziyle yo\u011fun bir \u015fekilde ilgilenmesine gerek olmayacak.<\/p>\n
Andr\u00e9 Eminger’in olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi 2000 y\u0131l\u0131nda hen\u00fcz hi\u00e7 olgun ve yeti\u015fkin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve o nedenle inan\u00e7l\u0131 bir Nazi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bug\u00fcn \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia da daha \u00f6nce hi\u00e7 gerek\u00e7elendirilmemi\u015fti. Oysa ki tam olarak bu konuyla ilgili olarak tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenme \u015fans\u0131 vard\u0131. Konuya y\u00f6nelik dilek\u00e7eler de verilmemi\u015fti. Bug\u00fcn de esasen Eminger’in \u201eDie Jew Die\u201c (\u00d6l Yahudi \u00d6l) d\u00f6vmesini ne zaman yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun bilinmedi\u011fi ve d\u00f6vmenin \u00f6ncesinde \u201einan\u00e7l\u0131\u201c bir Nasyonal Sosyalist olamayaca\u011f\u0131 varsay\u0131m\u0131yla yetinildi. Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131 bu noktada da verilebilecek h\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 bir arg\u00fcman getirmeyip sadece olanlar\u0131 inkar etmekle yetindi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131: inan\u00e7l\u0131 bir Nasyonal Sosyalist ama bir fikri yok Bug\u00fcn Eminger’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaada bulunmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce, hen\u00fcz Nisan ay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda ek avukat olarak g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olan Sprafke bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Andr\u00e9 Eminger’in avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu. \u201eAvukat ve m\u00fcvekkili aras\u0131nda savunmaya nas\u0131l devam edilece\u011fi konusundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131\u201c g\u00f6revinin son bulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015fti. Karlsruheli […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1558"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1559,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558\/revisions\/1559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}