Bug\u00fcn Gerlach’\u0131n savunmas\u0131 m\u00fctalaada bulundu. Ve bu m\u00fctalaa da sonu\u00e7ta ikna edici olmay\u0131p Gerlach’\u0131 haketti\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmden kurtaramayacak olsa da en az\u0131ndan avukat Hachmeister’in a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015fu s\u00f6ylenebilir: Hi\u00e7 olmazsa nihayet bir m\u00fctalaa! Gerlach’\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 da davay\u0131 politik ama\u00e7larla kullanmak isteyen \u201epolitik \u00e7evrelere\u201c sald\u0131rd\u0131 ve 2000’ler \u00f6ncesinde sa\u011fc\u0131 ter\u00f6rle u\u011fra\u015fman\u0131n asla gerekmemi\u015f oldu\u011fu gibi tuhaf tezler \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Ama en az\u0131ndan mahkemeyi ikna etmek i\u00e7in ger\u00e7ekten \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterdiler ve Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sundu\u011fu delillere bir nebze derinlemesine e\u011fildiler.<\/p>\n
Hachmeister ilk olarak davan\u0131n \u00fczerindeki \u201eb\u00fcy\u00fck cezaland\u0131rma bask\u0131s\u0131ndan\u201c yak\u0131nd\u0131 ve B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos art\u0131k cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamayacaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in m\u00fcvekkilinin onlar\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lar\u0131n \u201eg\u00fcnah ke\u00e7isi\u201c haline gelmekten duydu\u011fu endi\u015feyi dile getirdi.Bu noktada Gerlach’la ilgili olarak bu bask\u0131n\u0131n ne kadar b\u00fcy\u00fck oldu\u011fu sorusu g\u00fcndeme geliyor. Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n be\u015f senelik hapis cezas\u0131 isteminin ard\u0131nda k\u00f6r\u00fc k\u00f6r\u00fcne bir cezaland\u0131rma arzusu yok. Aksine tam da Gerlach’\u0131n, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n NSU’nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7evresinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu pek de istekli olmayan soru\u015fturmalardan yarar sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu tezi savunulabilir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc 2011 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar kendileriyle s\u00fcrekli ba\u011flant\u0131da oldu\u011fu \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn eski dostu, sad\u0131k silah arkada\u015f\u0131 ve d\u00fczenli \u201esistem kontrollerine\u201c kat\u0131lan biri olarak NSU’yu sadece desteklemek yerine onun \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir.<\/p>\n
Ama Gerlach’\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcyle ili\u015fkisine dair az say\u0131da nesnel delil bulundu\u011fundan savunma onu eski arkada\u015flar\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle Zsch\u00e4pe, B\u00f6hnhardt ve Mundlos’u yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 ya\u015famlar\u0131nda desteklemek istemi\u015f olan, b\u00f6ylece bu ya\u015fam\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131 da g\u00f6ze alan, ama asla cinayet i\u015flenece\u011fini ve bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131lar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011fini hesaba katmam\u0131\u015f birisi olarak tan\u0131mlayabildi. Gerlach bu nedenle savunmaya g\u00f6re sonu\u00e7ta sadece bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc desteklemekten (banka soygunlar\u0131 nedeniyle) iki y\u0131l\u0131n alt\u0131nda bir hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131yd\u0131. Ancak Gerlach’\u0131n kendisi somut bir ceza miktar\u0131 talebinde bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve mahkemenin verece\u011fi cezay\u0131 kabullenmeye haz\u0131rd\u0131. Avukat Rokni-Yazdi bunun ard\u0131ndan, iki y\u0131l\u0131n alt\u0131ndaki bir cezada da, Gerlach’a y\u00f6nelik iyi sosyal prognoza ra\u011fmen NSU’nun \u00f6zel \u00f6neminden dolay\u0131\u201ehukuk d\u00fczeninin savunmas\u0131\u201c ad\u0131na cezan\u0131n tecilinden vazge\u00e7ilebilece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundu. Bu da mahkemeye Gerlach’\u0131 bir ya da bir bu\u00e7uk y\u0131ll\u0131k ama tecilsiz k\u0131sa bir cezaya \u00e7arpt\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131k bir davetti.<\/p>\n
Avukat Hachmeister’in \u00f6zellikle Gerlach’\u0131 cinayetlerden ve patlay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131lardan haberi yokmu\u015f gibi g\u00f6steren arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 soyut olarak tamamen dinlenmeye de\u011ferler ve Hachmeister makul soru\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n eksikli\u011finden yararlanmay\u0131 da tamamen ba\u015fard\u0131. Ancak m\u00fcvekkilinin kendisi onun planlar\u0131na engel oldu: Gerlach sadec NSU’nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcne 2001\/2002 y\u0131llar\u0131nda bir ate\u015fli silah getirdi\u011fini itiraf etmekle kalmam\u0131\u015f, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcye o zaman be\u015f ki\u015fiyle d\u00fcnyay\u0131 kurtarmaya kalk\u0131\u015f\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015f oldu\u011fu bilgisini vermi\u015fti. Bu c\u00fcmlenin, \u00f6zellikle de be\u015f rakam\u0131n\u0131n ne anlama geldi\u011fini son olarak Carsten Schultze’nin avukatlar\u0131 tarif etmi\u015fti: Schultze NSU’yu Jena Silah Arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n ve politik hedeflere ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in silahl\u0131 \u015fiddete ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n mant\u0131kl\u0131 sonucu olarak tan\u0131ml\u0131yor. \u201eYer alt\u0131nda ya\u015fayan\u201c ve \u015fiddet su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fleyen \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fi yasal ya\u015famlar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcren ve \u201eyasal kol\u201c olarak g\u00f6rev g\u00f6ren iki ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan -yani Gerlach ve Wohlleben taraf\u0131ndan, \u00e7ekirdek kadronun son \u00fcyesi olan Andr\u00e9 Kapke \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7i yolsuzluk su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 nedeniyle d\u0131\u015far\u0131da b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131- destekleniyordu. Gerlach’\u0131n kendisi, i\u015flenecek su\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011funu itiraf etmi\u015fti, ama \u201eonlar\u0131\u201c bu su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flememeye ikna etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Bu ikna \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015f\u0131p ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir \u015fey anlatmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131, ancak NSU’nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcne silah\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u00e7ok kez kimlik belgelerini teslim etmi\u015f ve bu belgelerle \u201esa\u00e7ma bir \u015fey yapmayacaklar\u0131\u201cna y\u00f6nelik verdikleri s\u00f6zde s\u00f6ze g\u00fcvenmi\u015fti. B\u00f6ylece Gerlach’\u0131n kendisi verilecek bir h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7in gerekli olan kast\u0131n\u0131 itiraf etti ve h\u00fck\u00fcm giyecek. B\u00f6ylesine iyi bir m\u00fctalaa bile bunu de\u011fi\u015ftiremez.<\/p>\n
Savunman\u0131n arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131ndan baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eriksel olarak da yersiz olmalar\u0131 \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli de\u011fil ama i\u00e7lerinden birinden bahsetmek gerekli: Hem Hachmeister hem de Rokni-Yazdi Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n Gerlach’\u0131n Nazi camias\u0131ndan \u201eayr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131\u201cna ne kadar kay\u0131ts\u0131z kalm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015flerdi. Bunun nedeni bu ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7ok da ileri gitmemesi olabilirdi. Ne de olsa 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda Gerlach’\u0131n dairesinde el konulan PC ve telefonda say\u0131s\u0131z Nazi m\u00fczik par\u00e7as\u0131 ve resmi, Neonazi internet sitelerine yap\u0131lan ziyaretler, bir \u201eHammerskin\u201c festivaline davet vs. bulunmu\u015ftu. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n Gerlach’\u0131n camiadan \u201eayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u201c\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan da en az\u0131ndan \u00fc\u00e7 Nazi g\u00f6sterisine kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fuyla ilgili delil tespit dilek\u00e7eleri talebi mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Yani avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n teknik a\u00e7\u0131dan k\u0131smen \u00e7ok ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan m\u00fctalaas\u0131 da sonu\u00e7ta Gerlach’\u0131n bir i\u015fine yaramayacak.<\/p>\n
Davaya 15 May\u0131s Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131yla devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gerlach’\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131: gayet iyi haz\u0131rlan\u0131p kendi m\u00fcvekkileri taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc Bug\u00fcn Gerlach’\u0131n savunmas\u0131 m\u00fctalaada bulundu. Ve bu m\u00fctalaa da sonu\u00e7ta ikna edici olmay\u0131p Gerlach’\u0131 haketti\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmden kurtaramayacak olsa da en az\u0131ndan avukat Hachmeister’in a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015fu s\u00f6ylenebilir: Hi\u00e7 olmazsa nihayet bir m\u00fctalaa! Gerlach’\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 da davay\u0131 politik ama\u00e7larla kullanmak isteyen \u201epolitik \u00e7evrelere\u201c sald\u0131rd\u0131 ve 2000’ler […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1560"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1561,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1560\/revisions\/1561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}