A\u015f\u0131r\u0131 sa\u011fc\u0131 ideolojinin kendini d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya yans\u0131t\u0131\u015f \u015feklinin iki temel unsuru oldu\u011fu -yani acelecilik ve \u015fikayet\u00e7ilik- genel olarak ge\u00e7erliyse, Ralf Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcn sundu\u011fu m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda avukat Schneiders ilkinden, avukat Klemke ise ikincisinden sorumluydu.<\/p>\n
Schneiders’ g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkili her \u015feyden \u00f6nce bir kurband\u0131: Onun hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde pe\u015fin h\u00fck\u00fcmde bulunan bas\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131, \u201ecamia r\u00f6ntgencili\u011fi\u201c yapan \u201ekimi m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u201c kurban\u0131, politika ve medyan\u0131n beklentileri nedeniyle m\u00fcvekkillerine her ne pahas\u0131na olursa olsun h\u00fck\u00fcm giydirmek isteyen \u00f6nyarg\u0131l\u0131 medyan\u0131n kurban\u0131yd\u0131. M\u00fctalaas\u0131 mahkemenin davay\u0131 y\u00f6netim \u015fekline y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirilerin, Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eriksel konulara y\u00f6nelik verdi\u011fi delil tespit dilek\u00e7elerinin ve ilkel komplo teorilerinin bir kar\u0131\u015f\u0131m\u0131yd\u0131. Schneiders m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin beraat etmesi talebi\u00a0 ve mahkeme \u00fcylerine kararlar\u0131n\u0131n \u201ehesab\u0131n\u0131 bir g\u00fcn ahirette vermek zorunda kalacaklar\u0131\u201c uyar\u0131s\u0131yla bitirdi. Hitler’in temsilcisi Hess’in N\u00fcrnberg Davalar\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaas\u0131na bu k\u0131sa sayg\u0131 duru\u015fu, bu Nazi m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 uygun bir \u015fekilde noktalad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Wohlleben’\u00fcn \u00fc\u00e7 avukat\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde daha \u00f6nce \u015fahsen bir Neonazi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcnde faaliyette bulunmam\u0131\u015f tek avukat olarak bunu telafi ihtiyac\u0131 olan Klemke m\u00fctalaas\u0131na AfD’nin H\u00f6cke \u201ekanad\u0131nda\u201c bile sansasyon uyand\u0131racak bir atakla ba\u015flad\u0131. \u201eK\u0131z\u0131l-ye\u015fil\u201c medya ve Alman halk\u0131n\u0131n \u201ebir soy, k\u00fclt\u00fcr ve kader birli\u011fi olarak \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne\u201c yol a\u00e7acak olan bir \u201esu\u00e7 k\u00fclt\u00fcn\u00fc\u201c y\u00f6neten ve bu k\u00fclt\u00fc finanse de eden bir \u201es\u00f6zde g\u00f6\u00e7menler lobisi\u201c hakk\u0131nda sa\u00e7ma sapan a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundu. Yani NSU’nun itiraf videosunda da g\u00f6r\u00fclen klasik etnik evrilme ve halk \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ideolojisi hakk\u0131nda.<\/a> Klemke m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcnk\u00fc ilk b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6zellikle Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ceska seri tabancayla ilgili delillere y\u00f6nelik de\u011ferlendirmesine adad\u0131. Wohlleben’in ba\u015fa\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131ndan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fctalaas\u0131na ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fcne do\u011fru ara verildi.<\/p>\n Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131 fazla \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olmayan \u015fekilde, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n delilleri de\u011ferlendirmesine y\u00f6nelik tek tek sundu\u011fu ele\u015ftirilere ve bu kapsamdaki birka\u00e7 delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esine ra\u011fmen do\u011frudan mahkemeyi de\u011fil, daha \u00e7ok d\u0131\u015far\u0131daki \u00e7evreleri hedef al\u0131yordu. Savunman\u0131n avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n acele i\u00e7erisinde kendi kendileriyle \u00e7eli\u015fmeleri de avukatlar\u0131 fazla rahats\u0131z etmedi.\u00a0 \u00d6rne\u011fin Schneiders’in savunman\u0131n vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu halk \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc dilek\u00e7esine y\u00f6nelik \u00f6fkeli tepkilere kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak bunlar\u0131n itham anlam\u0131na geldiklerini s\u00f6ylemesinin k\u0131sa s\u00fcre ard\u0131ndan Klemke ayn\u0131 tezlere kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda. Ya da Schneiders bir yandan davay\u0131 politize eden k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lara sald\u0131r\u0131p di\u011fer yandan m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7ok say\u0131da delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esine (\u00f6rne\u011fin Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi’ndeki dosyalar\u0131n imhas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndakilere) eklenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve kendini m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n devletin rol\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturma \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc gibi g\u00f6sterdi\u011finde.<\/p>\n Bu m\u00fctalaa Wohlleben’i \u201esol-ye\u015fil kirletilmi\u015f\u201c medyan\u0131n ve adaletin su\u00e7suz bir kurban\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rmek isteyenleri bu iddiaya inand\u0131rma amac\u0131na ula\u015famayacak. Bununla ilgili daha fazla s\u00f6ylenecek bir \u015fey yok. Yar\u0131n yeniden avukat Klemke m\u00fctalaas\u0131na devam edecek, onun ard\u0131ndansa avukat Nahrath.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131: Acelecilik ve \u015eikayet\u00e7ilik A\u015f\u0131r\u0131 sa\u011fc\u0131 ideolojinin kendini d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya yans\u0131t\u0131\u015f \u015feklinin iki temel unsuru oldu\u011fu -yani acelecilik ve \u015fikayet\u00e7ilik- genel olarak ge\u00e7erliyse, Ralf Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcn sundu\u011fu m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda avukat Schneiders ilkinden, avukat Klemke ise ikincisinden sorumluydu. Schneiders’ g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkili her \u015feyden \u00f6nce bir kurband\u0131: Onun hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde pe\u015fin h\u00fck\u00fcmde bulunan bas\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1563"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1563\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1564,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1563\/revisions\/1564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}