Avukat Heer bug\u00fcn Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve yan dairedeki ya\u015fl\u0131 kad\u0131nla binada in\u015faat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yapan iki i\u015f\u00e7iyi \u00f6ld\u00fcrme te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnden cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilirli\u011fi konusundaki uzun a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na devam etti. Sabah saatlerinde delilleri tek tek ele al\u0131rken ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc hukuki de\u011ferlendirmede bulundu.<\/p>\n
Heer’in delillerin takdirine y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6zde net ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 dinlemek yeterince yorucu de\u011filmi\u015f gibi bu yoruculuk hukuki de\u011ferlendirmelere y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131nda daha da artt\u0131: Heer kendine a\u015f\u0131k ve bir s\u0131nav s\u0131ras\u0131nda problemin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131masalar da \u00e7ok say\u0131da hukuki ayr\u0131nt\u0131y\u0131 bildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermek isteyen bir hukuk \u00f6\u011frencisi tavr\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik kanunlar\u0131n farkl\u0131 unsurlar\u0131yla ilgili saatlerce a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin sadece hafif kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131ktan ve patlay\u0131c\u0131 madde kullan\u0131lan bir patlamaya ihmalkar bir \u015fekilde sebebiyet vermekten cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi sonucuna vard\u0131.<\/p>\n
Heer’in delillerin \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir gidi\u015fat\u0131n\u0131 son derece yarg\u0131sal bir karara y\u00f6nelik \u00e7ok say\u0131da bilgiyle bir araya getiren tarz\u0131 hukuk amat\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in \u00e7ok etkileyici olabilir. Beate Zsch\u00e4pe de \u201eeski avukatlar\u0131na\u201c kar\u015f\u0131 senelerdir bu kadar a\u00e7\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemi\u015fti. Ama Heer’in a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 sadece kritik yerlerinde hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan zay\u0131f olmakla kalmay\u0131p \u00f6z\u00fcnde kendi kalesine de gol at\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
Heer \u00f6rne\u011fin birbirine biti\u015fik iki binan\u0131n (ya\u015fl\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n da oturdu\u011fu) di\u011fer yar\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u011f\u0131r kundak\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik kanun paragraflar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan evin iki yar\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 binalar olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Bununla ilgili olarak Federal Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n kendi a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 onaylad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7ok say\u0131da h\u00fckm\u00fcnden al\u0131nt\u0131 yapt\u0131. G\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise \u015fuydu: Federal Yarg\u0131tay ger\u00e7ekten de, yap\u0131sal olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bina yar\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k kanunlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tek bir bina olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Ancak su\u00e7lunun eylemiyle yang\u0131n\u0131n binan\u0131n di\u011fer k\u0131sm\u0131na s\u0131\u00e7ramas\u0131n\u0131 hesaba katm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu ortaya koymas\u0131 durumunda bunun ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da eklemi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Ve Heer tam da bunu uzun uzad\u0131ya delil olarak g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131: A\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zetlersek Zsch\u00e4pe yang\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmadan \u00f6nce kom\u015fusunun zilini \u00e7alarak onun evde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan emin olmak istemi\u015fti. Kom\u015fusu cevap vermeyince onun evde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaym\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kendisi de a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda bunu ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Deliller de olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten de bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeydi.<\/p>\n
Ama tam da bu durum Zsch\u00e4pe’nin yang\u0131n\u0131n binan\u0131n di\u011fr yar\u0131s\u0131na s\u0131\u00e7rayabilece\u011fini hesaba katm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyordu. Aksi takdirde kom\u015fusunu uyarmas\u0131na gerek kalmazd\u0131. B\u00f6ylece Heer’in a\u011f\u0131r kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131kla ilgili arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 kendi m\u00fctalaas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131s\u0131 cinayet te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erliydi: Zsch\u00e4pe zili \u00e7alarak kom\u015fusunun yang\u0131nda \u00f6lmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6sterni\u015fti, zili \u00e7almas\u0131 net bir sonu\u00e7 vermese de evi kundaklam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. A\u011fz\u0131 normalde korkun\u00e7 derecede laf yapan Heer’in akl\u0131na bu arg\u00fcmana y\u00f6nelik olarak sadece Zsch\u00e4pe’nin, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda kom\u015fusunun \u00f6lme tehlikesinden de\u011fil tehlike alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fundan bahsetmi\u015f oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek geldi. Yani Zsch\u00e4pe’nin normalde \u00e7ok uygunsuz buldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 burada bir anda kar\u015f\u0131 arg\u00fcman olmaya yeterliydi, bu kritik noktaya kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k s\u00f6ylenecek ba\u015fka bir bir \u015fey yoktu. Heer’in tezine g\u00f6re neredeyse doksan ya\u015f\u0131nda olan, zor i\u015fiten ve hareketlili\u011fi k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 iki kez \u00e7almas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Zsch\u00e4pe’nin onun evde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan emin olabilmesi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fcnyan\u0131n ger\u00e7eklerinden \u00e7ok uzakt\u0131.<\/p>\n
Heer’in m\u00fctalaas\u0131 onun kendi g\u00f6z\u00fcndeki tecr\u00fcbeli, angaje ve nesnel avukat imaj\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7lendirebilir ve planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere kimi bas\u0131n mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131nda da b\u00f6yle alg\u0131lanabilir. Ancak Heer m\u00fcvekkiline d\u00fcn ve bug\u00fcn \u00e7ok k\u00f6t\u00fc bir \u015fekilde hizmet etti. M\u00fctalaas\u0131 nihayetinde verilecek karara etki etmeyecek, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc (Heer’in \u00f6nemli kar\u015f\u0131 arg\u00fcmanlarda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta Stahl ve Sturm’un da haklar\u0131nda konu\u015faca\u011f\u0131) on cinayette ve iki patlay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da su\u00e7 ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan giyece\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn yan\u0131nda Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe kompleksi verilecek cezaya etkide bulunmayacak.<\/p>\n
\u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta ilk olarak Stahl ve Sturm en az iki g\u00fcn boyunca m\u00fctalaada bulunacaklar. Ayr\u0131ca m\u00fctalaalar\u0131nda binan\u0131n yap\u0131sal nitelikleriyle ilgili ba\u015fka -anlams\u0131z- delil tespit dilek\u00e7eleri vercekler ve bu dilek\u00e7eler hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesi gerekecek. Mahkeme ancak \u00f6b\u00fcr hafta (19-21 Haziran) san\u0131klara son kez s\u00f6z verebilecek ve bir sonraki hafta da (26-28.06) karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayacak gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Avukat Heer Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe’deki kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ile ilgili m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 bitirdi Avukat Heer bug\u00fcn Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kundak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve yan dairedeki ya\u015fl\u0131 kad\u0131nla binada in\u015faat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yapan iki i\u015f\u00e7iyi \u00f6ld\u00fcrme te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnden cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilirli\u011fi konusundaki uzun a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na devam etti. Sabah saatlerinde delilleri tek tek ele al\u0131rken ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc hukuki de\u011ferlendirmede bulundu. Heer’in delillerin takdirine y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6zde net ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 dinlemek yeterince yorucu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1574"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1575,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574\/revisions\/1575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}