M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi\u2019nin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 21 Nisan g\u00fcn\u00fc, yani verilen m\u00fchletin dolmas\u0131na bir g\u00fcn kala yaz\u0131 i\u015flerine ula\u015ft\u0131. Yani mahkeme heyeti yaz\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendisine verilen zaman\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131. Bu tabii ki hukuken uygun, ancak karar\u0131n s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak duyurulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan neredeyse iki y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuldu\u011funda kesinlikle problem yaratan bir durum. \u00d6zellikle de NSU ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n nihai olarak sonlanmas\u0131na atfedilmesi gereken de\u011fer s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda. Bu \u015fekilde mahkemenin Zsch\u00e4pe, Wohlleben, Schultze, Gerlach ve Eminger\u2019e kar\u015f\u0131 verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn tamamen g\u00fcndelik ve s\u0131radan bir konu oldu\u011funu ve NSU kompleksinin zaten kapanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu vurgulamak istedi\u011fi izlenimi do\u011fuyor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Bu ald\u0131rmazl\u0131k kas\u0131tl\u0131 olsun olmas\u0131n s\u00fcrmeye devam ediyor, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc karar yaz\u0131 i\u015flerine gelmesinin k\u0131sa s\u00fcre ard\u0131ndan \u00e7e\u015fitli gazetecilere iletilirken m\u00fcdahil avukatlaraysa iletilmedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Burada gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek istemiyoruz. \u0130lk olarak karar bize hala sunulmad\u0131, ikinci olaraksa ba\u015fl\u0131ca hukuki ve fiili konulara dair zaten g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmi\u015ftik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u015eu anda g\u00fcndemde olan en \u00f6nemli soru, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n san\u0131k Andr\u00e9 Eminger\u2019in k\u0131smen beraatinin temyizi konusunda nas\u0131l hareket edece\u011fi. Mahkeme, fikirlerine ba\u011fl\u0131 ve \u015fiddet yanl\u0131s\u0131 bir Neonazi ve NSU\u2019nun \u00e7ekirdek \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn en g\u00fcvendi\u011fi ki\u015fi olan Eminger\u2019in 2008 y\u0131l\u0131na kadarki uzun y\u0131llar boyunca kendisinin tedarik etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ara\u00e7larla vs. \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn ne yapmay\u0131 planlad\u0131klar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir fikri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na inand\u0131. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bunun i\u00e7erik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sa\u00e7mal\u0131k oldu\u011fu daha Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Weingarten ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde \u201cvideodaki d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Pembe Panter fig\u00fcr\u00fc belki de Bay Eminger\u2019i temsil ediyor olabilir mi\u201d diye sormu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k -temsilcisi Weingarten\u2019\u0131n bu ge\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n aksine- Eminger\u2019i NSU\u2019nun \u00fcyesi olmakla su\u00e7lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu zaten izole \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc tezine ve bununla birlikte nihayetinde NSU konusunun \u201cAlmanya\u2019da Nazi ter\u00f6r\u00fc yoktur\u201d \u015fiar\u0131na uygun olarak hallolmu\u015f oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131na ters d\u00fc\u015ferdi. Ve daha duru\u015fmalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda Eminger\u2019e y\u00f6nelik kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphesi bulunan ama karar s\u00fcrecinde fikrini de\u011fi\u015ftiren mahkeme de Eminger\u2019in \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcye ne kadar yak\u0131n oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesinin, konunun kapand\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131n genel olarak sorgulanmas\u0131na neden olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlam\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u015eimdi Eminger\u2019in k\u0131smen beraatine kar\u015f\u0131 (sadece) Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k temyiz talebinde bulundu. Yani hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan zor bir durumdalar, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir ay i\u00e7erisinde karar\u0131n hukuken yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu ortaya koymalar\u0131 ve bunu yaparken ayn\u0131 zamanda Eminger\u2019in asl\u0131nda \u00fcye oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle iddian\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu kabul etmemeleri gerekiyor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu noktada Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz talebinin pe\u015fine \u0131srarla d\u00fc\u015fmeyip NSU davas\u0131na nihayet istedi\u011fi son noktay\u0131 koymak i\u00e7in temyizi tamamen geri \u00e7ekmesinden korkuluyor. Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin su\u00e7 orta\u011f\u0131 olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm giymesinin hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na (ki bize g\u00f6re kesinlikle hakl\u0131) dair tamamen hukuki soruyla birlikte en \u00f6nemli ve merak uyand\u0131ran soru Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz konusunda nas\u0131l davranaca\u011f\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
NSU kompleksinin ger\u00e7ekten ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyen ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesinin karar\u0131ndan beklenecek fazla bir \u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 en az\u0131ndan 11 Temmuz 2018\u2019den bu yana ortada. Buna ra\u011fmen talepleri, \u2018Kein Schlussstrich\u2019 kampanyas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi davan\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6rt\u00fclmemesi ve bu talebin en \u00f6nemli ifadesi \u015fu an itibariyle Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Weingarten\u2019\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131ndaki do\u011fru a\u00e7\u0131klamalara sad\u0131k kal\u0131p Eminger\u2019in cezas\u0131n\u0131n temyizinden \u201cvazge\u00e7memesi\u201d gerekti\u011fi!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi\u2019nin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 21 Nisan g\u00fcn\u00fc, yani verilen m\u00fchletin dolmas\u0131na bir g\u00fcn kala yaz\u0131 i\u015flerine ula\u015ft\u0131. Yani mahkeme heyeti yaz\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendisine verilen zaman\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131. Bu tabii ki hukuken uygun, ancak karar\u0131n s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak duyurulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan neredeyse iki y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuldu\u011funda kesinlikle problem yaratan bir durum. \u00d6zellikle […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1609"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1609\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1611,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1609\/revisions\/1611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}