Nihayet bug\u00fcn, Rostock’daki Mehmet Turgut cinayetindeki kan\u0131t kay\u0131d\u0131 ba\u015flad\u0131. En son tarafgirlik olabilir diye, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Wohlleben’nin savunmac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan, istek yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131, bununla ilgili \u015fahitler bir\u00e7ok kere davetiyeden \u00e7evirilmi\u015fti. \u00c7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda birka\u00e7 polis memur vard\u0131.<\/p>\n
Olay yerini ara\u015ft\u0131ran ki\u015fi, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok dikkatli ara\u015ft\u0131rmalardan, bilgi veriyor. Onun sonucu: \u201cOnlar \u00e7almak veya benzeri \u015feyler i\u00e7in gelmediler. Onlar sadece \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in geldiler.\u201d<\/p>\n
Onun i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7o\u011fu, ara\u015ft\u0131rmalardan bilgi verdiler ve di\u011fer olaylardan hen\u00fcz bilinen \u015feyleri onaylad\u0131lar. \u00c7eska-silah\u0131yla yap\u0131lan cinayet, cinayet dizisinden bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc oldu\u011funu, polisler bir yandan erken biliyordu, di\u011fer yandan ama yinede uzun zaman buyunca, s\u00f6zde \u015f\u00fcpheli olan Turgut ailesine ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan D\u00f6ner d\u00fckkan\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fletmecisinin ailesine kar\u015f\u0131ki ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar yap\u0131ld\u0131. Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n ba\u015f y\u00f6netimcisi, \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 bir motifin somut bir delilin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6yledi. Olaydan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra, bir polis bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle bir tez yap\u0131ld\u0131: \u201c\u015eimdilik \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 bir motif d\u0131\u015flanabilir.\u201d<\/p>\n
Olaydan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra, \u00f6lmek \u00fczere olan Mehmet Turgut’u bulan D\u00f6ner d\u00fckkan\u0131n i\u015fletmecisi, Turgut ailesinin ve kendi ac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 somut bir \u015fekilde anlatt\u0131. Kendisi d\u00fckkan\u0131ndan vaz ge\u00e7ti ve hi\u00e7 birdaha oraya ayak basmad\u0131. Polisler onu, \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcre sorgulak\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrekli \u201csen her\u015feyi biliyorsun\u201d diyerek, kendisi su\u00e7luymu\u015f gibi davrand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, tasvir etti.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131 temsilcisi Basay’\u0131n, ana koruma dairesinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 Temme’ye kar\u015f\u0131ki olan davadaki dosyay\u0131 bu davaya ekleme dilek\u00e7esi, reddildi. H\u00fck\u00fcmetin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc: Bu M\u00fcnih davas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131s\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hi\u00e7bir \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yor. \u015eahidin \u00f6nemi gayet net g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dahil, bu karar m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131 temsilcilerde huzursuzluk \u00fc\u011fretti. Bayan avukat Basay yar\u0131n, bu verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 bir raporunu verece\u011fini, duyurdu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Mehmet Turgut’un cinayetine Nihayet bug\u00fcn, Rostock’daki Mehmet Turgut cinayetindeki kan\u0131t kay\u0131d\u0131 ba\u015flad\u0131. En son tarafgirlik olabilir diye, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Wohlleben’nin savunmac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan, istek yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131, bununla ilgili \u015fahitler bir\u00e7ok kere davetiyeden \u00e7evirilmi\u015fti. \u00c7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda birka\u00e7 polis memur vard\u0131. Olay yerini ara\u015ft\u0131ran ki\u015fi, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok dikkatli ara\u015ft\u0131rmalardan, bilgi veriyor. Onun sonucu: \u201cOnlar \u00e7almak […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}