{"id":427,"date":"2014-02-19T17:43:14","date_gmt":"2014-02-19T16:43:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=427"},"modified":"2014-02-20T17:39:55","modified_gmt":"2014-02-20T16:39:55","slug":"19-02-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2014\/02\/19\/19-02-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"19.02.2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Konu bir kez daha tan\u0131k Liebau<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak tan\u0131k Liebau\u2019yu sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuru ifade verdi. Liebau, Ralf Wohlleben ve Carsten Schulze\u2019nin iddialara g\u00f6re NSU\u2019nun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinayet silah\u0131n\u0131 tedarik ettikleri ve Nazi \u00e7evresinin al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fckkan\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fletiyordu. Mahkemede, Wohlleben veya Schultze\u2019nin kendine silahlarla ilgili herhangi bir \u015fey sormad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Polise verdi\u011fi ve silahlar\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn birden \u00e7ok kez ge\u00e7ti\u011fi ifade soruldu\u011funda, orada kurus\u0131k\u0131 tabancalar\u0131n ve gaz silahlar\u0131n\u0131n kastedildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015fti. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bask\u0131ya maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti (7.11.13 ve 29.1.14 tarihlerinde konu hakk\u0131nda bilgi vermi\u015ftik).<\/p>\n<p>Memurlar\u0131n sorgusu, Liebau\u2019nun ka\u00e7amak s\u00f6zler sarfetti\u011fini g\u00f6steriyordu. Liebau polisteyken \u00f6nce hi\u00e7bir \u015fey hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f, ama daha sonra Wohlleben\u2019in ona bir silahtan bahsetmi\u015f oldu\u011funu en az\u0131ndan \u201ereddetmemi\u015fti.\u201c Genel olarak Nazi camias\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcyeleri taraf\u0131ndan da kendisine s\u0131kl\u0131kla silahlar hakk\u0131nda soru soruluyordu. S\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc ettikleri aras\u0131nda Kosova Sava\u015f\u0131\u2019nda kullan\u0131lan silahlar\u0131 tedarik edebilen bir \u201eS\u0131rp veya H\u0131rvat\u201c da vard\u0131. Yani her ihtimalde kurus\u0131k\u0131 tabancalar\u0131n s\u00f6zkonusu oldu\u011funa dair mahkemede verdi\u011fi beyan, a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde yaland\u0131. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar bu nedenle bu yalan ifadenin tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmesi i\u00e7in halihaz\u0131rda talepte bulunmu\u015flard\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Liebau burada sorgulanan tan\u0131klar i\u00e7inde hat\u0131rlamama, inkar etme ve olaylar\u0131 \u00f6nemsizmi\u015f gibi g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma oyununu oynayan ilk ki\u015fiydi. Mahkemenin onun pe\u015fine d\u00fc\u015fmesi bu y\u00fczden memnuniyet vericiydi. Bununla birlikte Liebau\u2019nun daha polisteyken \u201ehaf\u0131za eksiklerine\u201c oynam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da bug\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k kazand\u0131. Hen\u00fcz mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen sorgusunda kendisine daha az ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fc \u015fekilde davran\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni buydu.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fka bir polis memuru, Beate Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin oturdu\u011fu evde Ocak 1998\u2019de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir aramay\u0131 anlatt\u0131. Arama s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli silahlar\u0131n (tatar yay\u0131, sapan, \u00e7ok say\u0131da b\u0131\u00e7ak vs.) yan\u0131nda Reich\u2019\u0131n sembol\u00fc olan sava\u015f bayra\u011f\u0131 ve \u201ePogromly\u201c oyununun bir \u00f6rne\u011fi de bulunmu\u015ftu (konuyla ilgili olarak bkz. d\u00fcnk\u00fc rapor). Buluntular bir kez daha g\u00f6steriyordu ki Zsch\u00e4pe de hen\u00fcz 1998 y\u0131l\u0131ndayken Nasyonal Sosyalist ideolojiye s\u0131k\u0131ca ba\u011fl\u0131 ve son derece \u015fiddet e\u011filimliydi.<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klamalar ve dilek\u00e7elerle devam edildi. Avukat Dr. Daimag\u00fcler m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar i\u00e7in Polenzstra\u00dfe\u2019deki kad\u0131n kom\u015funun sorgusu ve orada alt\u0131 \u00e7izilen \u201eAlman Normalli\u011fi\u201c ile ilgili bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundu (bkz. 3.2.2014 tarihli rapor). Avukat Stolle, Heilbronn\u2019daki iki cinayet kurban\u0131n\u0131n, kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n m\u0131 hedefi yoksa polise y\u00f6nelik genel bir sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n tesad\u00fcfi kurbanlar\u0131 m\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131n (bkz 21.1.2014 tarihli rapor) ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131na devam edilmesi i\u00e7in bu iki memurun \u00fcstlerinin sorgulanmas\u0131 talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n<p>Son olarak avukat Ba\u015fay, Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg Eyalet Kriminal Dairesi\u2019nin \u201esoru\u015fturma grubu \u00e7evresinden\u201c kad\u0131n bir memurun, NSU\u2019nun Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131yla ilgil olarak sorgulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi. Konuyla ilgili ifadeler aras\u0131nda bir tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n Heilbronn\u2019daki sald\u0131r\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 35 km uzakta Beate Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019yi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair ifadesi de vard\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Konu bir kez daha tan\u0131k Liebau Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak tan\u0131k Liebau\u2019yu sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuru ifade verdi. Liebau, Ralf Wohlleben ve Carsten Schulze\u2019nin iddialara g\u00f6re NSU\u2019nun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinayet silah\u0131n\u0131 tedarik ettikleri ve Nazi \u00e7evresinin al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fckkan\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fletiyordu. Mahkemede, Wohlleben veya Schultze\u2019nin kendine silahlarla ilgili herhangi bir \u015fey sormad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Polise verdi\u011fi ve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}