{"id":447,"date":"2014-02-27T23:00:31","date_gmt":"2014-02-27T22:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=447"},"modified":"2014-02-28T15:09:24","modified_gmt":"2014-02-28T14:09:24","slug":"27-02-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2014\/02\/27\/27-02-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"27.02.2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Yalanlar ve Masum G\u00f6sterme \u00c7abalar\u0131 IV 1\/2: Mandy Struck ka\u00e7amak cevaplar vermeye devam ediyor; mahkemeyse onu s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yor.<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn tan\u0131k Mandy Struck ifade vermeye devam etti. Struck mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zge\u00e7mi\u015fi, Chemnitz\u2019deki Nazi camias\u0131 ve di\u011fer konulara dair sorular\u0131na yan\u0131t verdi. Yine g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr \u015fekilde rol\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fundan azm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00fc\u00e7 \u201ekonu\u011funun\u201c kimlikleri ve ge\u00e7mi\u015fleri hakk\u0131nda bir fikri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onlar\u0131 bir daha hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini ve 2011\/2012 y\u0131llar\u0131nda da Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos und B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131 yeniden tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti.<\/p>\n<p>Struck 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00f6nce kriminal polis, sonra da bir hakim taraf\u0131ndan sorguya \u00e7ekilmi\u015fti, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc soru\u015fturmalar \u201e\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201c ile ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu ortaya \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bug\u00fcn inatla o zamanlar kimlerin s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fundan haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Mahkeme Heyeti Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Hakim G\u00f6tzl, Struck\u2019u iddias\u0131n\u0131n inan\u0131lmaz olman\u0131n da \u00f6tesinde oldu\u011fu konusunda defalarca ve \u00e7ok sert \u015fekilde uyard\u0131. Ne de olsa o zamanlarki tutanaklarda \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn isimleri ge\u00e7iyordu, foto\u011fraflar\u0131 vard\u0131, sahte belgeler vs. s\u00f6z konusuydu. Struck iddias\u0131nda diretmeye devam etti.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fkan\u0131n Nazi camias\u0131ndan tan\u0131klar\u0131n apa\u00e7\u0131k yalanlar\u0131n\u0131 ve olaylar\u0131 hat\u0131rlamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrmelerini daha fazla kabul etmemesi ve ele\u015ftirel \u015fekilde sorgulamas\u0131 m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok memnuniyet vericiydi. \u0130lgin\u00e7 olan tam da ifade vermeyi reddetme \u015fans\u0131na sahip olan ve mahkemede avukat\u0131yla birlikte bulunan Struck\u2019un, yalan ifade sebebiyle muhtemelen ceza alacak \u015fekilde kendi kendini k\u00f6\u015feye s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131yd\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fkan\u0131n uzun s\u00fcren sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc sorgular\u0131na ba\u015flayabildiler. Ama fazla ileri gidemediler, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc hem Struck buna yine engel oldu hem de Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k ve savunma, \u00f6rne\u011fin Struck\u2019un camiadaki rol\u00fcyle ilgili sorular\u0131n konuyla ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla bir\u00e7ok kez araya girdi. Bu apa\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde sa\u00e7mal\u0131kt\u0131, ama sorguyu ancak 16:30\u2019a do\u011fru sonland\u0131r\u0131lacak kadar geciktirmeye yetti. Struck\u2019un sorgulanmas\u0131na ba\u015fka bir zaman devam edilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yalanlar ve Masum G\u00f6sterme \u00c7abalar\u0131 IV 1\/2: Mandy Struck ka\u00e7amak cevaplar vermeye devam ediyor; mahkemeyse onu s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yor. Bug\u00fcn tan\u0131k Mandy Struck ifade vermeye devam etti. Struck mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zge\u00e7mi\u015fi, Chemnitz\u2019deki Nazi camias\u0131 ve di\u011fer konulara dair sorular\u0131na yan\u0131t verdi. Yine g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr \u015fekilde rol\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fundan azm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00fc\u00e7 \u201ekonu\u011funun\u201c kimlikleri ve ge\u00e7mi\u015fleri hakk\u0131nda bir [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}