{"id":659,"date":"2014-09-04T23:25:42","date_gmt":"2014-09-04T21:25:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=659"},"modified":"2014-09-06T14:47:18","modified_gmt":"2014-09-06T12:47:18","slug":"04-09-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2014\/09\/04\/04-09-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"04.09.2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt hakk\u0131nda Jena\u2019da ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen soru\u015fturmalar ve 26.01.1998 tarihli arama<\/h4>\n<p>Soru\u015fturma Ekibi Tex\u2019in y\u00f6neticisi olarak 1997 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2011 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar Mundlos, Zsch\u00e4pe, B\u00f6hnhardt ve yolda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n di\u011fer \u00fcyelerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ok say\u0131da sahte bomba olay\u0131 nedeniyle soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olan Th\u00fcringen Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Memuru Dressler\u2019in asl\u0131nda sadece bir saat kadar sorgulanmas\u0131 gerekiyordu, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc onun ard\u0131ndan Chemnitzli Thomas Rothe\u2019nin (bkz. <a title=\"29.07.2014\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2014\/07\/29\/29-07-2014\/\" target=\"_blank\">29.07.2014<\/a> tarihli blog) sorgusuna devam edilmesi gerekiyordu. Ama Dressler\u2019in sorgusu 16\u2019ya kadar s\u00fcr\u00fcnce Rothe yine hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yapmadan evine g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n<p>Dressler daha \u00f6nceden mevcut olan \u00d6zel Komisyon Rex\u2019in \u00e7e\u015fitli sahte bomba ve sahte bombal\u0131 mektup vakalar\u0131na dair soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131 teslim alm\u0131\u015f ve bunu kendi soru\u015fturma ekibi Tex\u2019in faaliyetlerinin temeli haline getirmi\u015fti. \u00d6zel komisyon Rex, somut su\u00e7lar\u0131n yan\u0131nda militan sa\u011fc\u0131 camian\u0131n yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karma g\u00f6revine sahipken, bu g\u00f6rev soru\u015fturma ekibi Tex ile iptal olmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n<p>Su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi, eylemlerin a\u00e7\u0131k politik y\u00f6n\u00fc ve \u00e7e\u015fitli somut ipu\u00e7lar\u0131na dayanarak Jena Yolda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na y\u00f6nelikti. Tex, Federal Savc\u0131l\u0131k\u2019\u0131n su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kurma su\u00e7lamas\u0131n\u0131 da soru\u015fturmaya ilave etmesini talep etmi\u015fti, ama bu reddedilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n<p>Soru\u015fturma ekibi su\u00e7ulular\u0131n gizli bir at\u00f6lyesi oldu\u011funu varsay\u0131yordu. Bu y\u00fczden at\u00f6lyenin bulunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Uwe B\u00f6hnardt\u2019\u0131n g\u00f6zetlenmesi gerekiyordu. Ama Eyalet Kriminal Dairesi sadece \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne bir g\u00f6zetim memuru sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve bu g\u00f6zetim bir sonu\u00e7 vermemi\u015fti. Ama Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin de B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131 g\u00f6zetledi\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ftu. Dressler onlara ba\u015fvurup g\u00f6zetime devam edilmesini ve mahkemede kullan\u0131labilir bilgilerin teslimini rica etmi\u015fti. Eyalet Dairesi daha sonra ger\u00e7ekten de konuyla ilgili bir rapor teslim etmi\u015f ve garaj\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015f, anack garaj\u0131 gizli olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131r\u0131p Dressler\u2019in ricas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bundan vazge\u00e7memi\u015fti. Dressler raporu bir kenara koyup bu bulgular\u0131n polise ait oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi bir not d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Buna dayanarak daha sonra garaj i\u00e7in bir arama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Araman\u0131n kendisi a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc \u015fekilde haz\u0131rlanm\u015ft\u0131. Soru\u015fturma y\u00f6netici Dressler bir e\u011fitimdeydi. \u0130lgili savc\u0131 kendi izni olmadan hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ceza yarg\u0131s\u0131na dair bir faaliyette bulunulmamas\u0131n\u0131 emretmi\u015fti, ama araman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00fcn kendisine ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Temsilcisine de ilk olarak ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Aramay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren memurlar\u0131n yan\u0131nda asma kilit k\u0131racak ara\u00e7 bile yoktu ve itfaiyei \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmak zorunda kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131n dairesindeki garaj\u0131n daha \u00f6nce bomba imalathanesi olarak aranm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fildi. Bu garajda B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131n engel \u00e7\u0131kmadan kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 binek arac\u0131 vard\u0131. Memurlar daha sonra i\u00e7inde, \u00e7o\u011funa Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin abone oldu\u011fu Nazi dergileri ve adres listeleri gibi \u00e7e\u015fitli belgelerin yan\u0131nda bombalar\u0131n ve bomba imal malzemelerinin bulundu\u011fu ikinci garaj\u0131 a\u00e7acak olan itfaiyenin gelmesini sakince beklemi\u015flerdi.<\/p>\n<p>Buna dayanarak 28.01.1998 tarihinde \u00fc\u00e7 ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n aranmas\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015flaracak olan tutuklama emirleri verilmi\u015fti. Bu arama bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn Chemnitz\u2019de kalmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bilgiler bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen sonu\u00e7 vermemi\u015fti. Garajda bulunan kapsaml\u0131 adres listeleri, Federal Kriminal Dairesi onlar\u0131 \u201edavayla ilgisiz\u201c olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan soru\u015fturmalarda kullan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin, Dressler defalarca kez \u0131srarla derecelerinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesini talep etmesine ra\u011fmen B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131n g\u00f6zetlenmesine dair raporun ve garaj\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gizli tutulmas\u0131nda \u0131srar etmesi \u00e7ok g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131yd\u0131. G\u00f6zetlemenin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n gizli tutulmas\u0131nda nas\u0131l bir \u00f6zel \u00e7\u0131kar s\u00f6z konusuydu? Buna ilaveten garaj\u0131n bulundu\u011fu arazi \u00e7itle \u00e7evriliydi ve d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan zor g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyordu, bu y\u00fczden garaj\u0131n tespitinin sadece g\u00f6zetlemeyle yap\u0131lmas\u0131 pek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnm\u00fcyordu. Burada olas\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama, asl\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu olan\u0131n g\u00f6zetlemenin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 de\u011fil de \u201e\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc\u201cn\u00fcn yak\u0131n \u00e7evresinden bir muhbirin verdi\u011fi bilgiler olmas\u0131. Tan\u0131k bu olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 do\u011frulamak istemedi, ama Anayasay\u0131 Koruma\u2019n\u0131n tavr\u0131na da anlam veremedi.<\/p>\n<p>Zsch\u00e4pe ve Wolleben\u2019in avukatlar\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilen delillerke ilgili ifadesinin de\u011ferlendirilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131lar ve buna sebep olarak memurun Eyalet Dairesi\u2019nin gizli bilgilerini kendi bilgisi gibi sunmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdiler.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt hakk\u0131nda Jena\u2019da ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen soru\u015fturmalar ve 26.01.1998 tarihli arama Soru\u015fturma Ekibi Tex\u2019in y\u00f6neticisi olarak 1997 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2011 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar Mundlos, Zsch\u00e4pe, B\u00f6hnhardt ve yolda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n di\u011fer \u00fcyelerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ok say\u0131da sahte bomba olay\u0131 nedeniyle soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olan Th\u00fcringen Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Memuru Dressler\u2019in asl\u0131nda sadece bir saat kadar sorgulanmas\u0131 gerekiyordu, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc onun ard\u0131ndan Chemnitzli [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}