Bug\u00fcn Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 8.11.2011 tarihinde ba\u015fvurmu\u015f oldu\u011fu eski avukat\u0131 tan\u0131k olarak \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe onun \u00fczerinden, 4.11.2011 tarihinde \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 yang\u0131nda zarar g\u00f6rmesin diye Fr\u00fchlingstra\u00dfe’deki kom\u015fusunun kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlamak amac\u0131yla avukat\u0131n\u0131 susma zorunlulu\u011fundan k\u0131smen muaf tutnu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n
Ancak daha \u00f6nce belirtildi\u011fi gibi b\u00f6ylesi bir kap\u0131 \u00e7alma olay\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin cinayete kast\u0131 oldu\u011fu ihtimalinin aleyhine de\u011fil lehindeydi. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc kom\u015fusunun evde oldu\u011funu ve alevlerin onun hayat\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsayd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyordu. Savunma, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin kom\u015fusuyla konu\u015fmu\u015f oldu\u011funu ve ondan binay\u0131 terketmesini istedi\u011fini iddia etmiyor.<\/p>\n
Savunman\u0131n dava ile ilgili tutumu mahkeme salonunda \u00e7ok say\u0131da tart\u0131\u015fmaya yol a\u00e7t\u0131: Zsch\u00e4pe eski avukat\u0131n\u0131 susma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sadece a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 \u015fekilde muaf tutmu\u015ftu. A\u00e7\u0131klama, bir \u00e7ok m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131n\u0131n reddetti\u011fi gibi, nihayetinde sadece tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunman\u0131n delil iddias\u0131n\u0131 incelemeden onaylamas\u0131n\u0131n gerekmesine yol a\u00e7\u0131yordu. Di\u011fer kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n iddia edilen konu\u015fmayla ilgili sorular\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu sorular\u0131, savunma taraf\u0131ndan daha tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisi susma zorunlulu\u011funa dayanmak isteyip istemedi\u011fine karar vermeden reddedildi. Mahkeme sorular\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funa izin verdi, tan\u0131k olduk\u00e7a az konu\u015farak yan\u0131tlad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Her \u015fekilde savunman\u0131n plan\u0131 i\u00e7eriksel olarak da ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olamad\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Zsch\u00e4pe’nin konu\u015fmada verdi\u011fi bilgilerin pek faydal\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belli olmu\u015ftu. Eski avukat\u0131, ya\u015fl\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n Zsch\u00e4pe ile ayn\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n orada oturdu\u011fu ve Zsch\u00e4pe’nin bu y\u00fczden kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcndeydi. Ama Zsch\u00e4pe asl\u0131nda sadece bina giri\u015findeki zili \u00e7alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve daha o zaman 80 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde olan kad\u0131n\u0131n zili duyup duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etme imkan\u0131na sahip de\u011fildi. Ayn\u0131 zamanda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinden Zsch\u00e4pe’nin ona, en az\u0131ndan Fr\u00fchlingstra\u00dfe’deki yang\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcst\u00fc \u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc olarak itiraf etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Son olarak 4.11.2014 tarihli duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan Neonazi ve eski muhbir Sczepanski konu oldu. Sczepanski tan\u0131k koruma kapsam\u0131nda bulunuyor, bundan sorumlu olan Brandenburg \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve sesinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ve (!) M\u00fcnih’teki mahkeme salonundaki izleyicilerin salondan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131yla bir video sorgusu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine izin veriyor. Gerek\u00e7e olaraksa tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n “ihaneti” nedeniyle Neonazilerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi olas\u0131 intikam eylemleri tehlikesini g\u00f6steriyor. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar bu tehlike \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u00f6t\u00fc \u015fekilde ifade edildi\u011fini belirtti. \u00d6rne\u011fin kendisi de tan\u0131k koruma program\u0131na dahil olan san\u0131k Schultze, 150 g\u00fcnden fazlad\u0131r \u00f6zel \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmadan ana duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131l\u0131yor ve farkedilir bir tehlike ya da kamuoyunda \u00e7\u0131kan tek bir foto\u011fraf bile s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fil. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar, mahkemenin \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n M\u00fcnih’te ifade vermesi i\u00e7in bask\u0131 yapmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Fr\u00fchlingsstra\u00dfe yang\u0131n\u0131na dair Bug\u00fcn Beate Zsch\u00e4pe’nin 8.11.2011 tarihinde ba\u015fvurmu\u015f oldu\u011fu eski avukat\u0131 tan\u0131k olarak \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe onun \u00fczerinden, 4.11.2011 tarihinde \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 yang\u0131nda zarar g\u00f6rmesin diye Fr\u00fchlingstra\u00dfe’deki kom\u015fusunun kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlamak amac\u0131yla avukat\u0131n\u0131 susma zorunlulu\u011fundan k\u0131smen muaf tutnu\u015ftu. Ancak daha \u00f6nce belirtildi\u011fi gibi b\u00f6ylesi bir kap\u0131 \u00e7alma olay\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin cinayete kast\u0131 oldu\u011fu ihtimalinin aleyhine de\u011fil […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/716\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}