Delillerin \u015fu ana kadarki durumuna g\u00f6re cinayet tabancas\u0131 Ceska’y\u0131 sat\u0131n al\u0131p Almanya’ya satan \u0130svi\u00e7reli Hans-Ulrich M\u00fcller, \u0130svi\u00e7re’deki sorgusu esnas\u0131nda bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131na eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 S.I. ve Apolda’dan uzak bir tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan Dieter S.’nin esas Ceska sat\u0131c\u0131lar olduklar\u0131 (bkz. 22.10.2014 tarihli blog) iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcller’in bu iddias\u0131n\u0131n tek amac\u0131 kendisi ve arkada\u015f\u0131 Theile’ye y\u00f6nelen dikkatleri da\u011f\u0131tmak idiyse bunu k\u0131smen ba\u015fard\u0131. Sonu\u00e7 olarak bug\u00fcn art\u0131k emekli olan \u0130svi\u00e7reli sorgu hakimi ve eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n partneri oldu\u011fu iddia edilen ki\u015fi sorguland\u0131. M\u00fcller yeniden Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan sorgu i\u00e7in M\u00fcnih’e \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131. Bu sorgu i\u00e7in ona “tutuklanmama garantisi” verildi, yani Almanya’da Ceska sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden ceza takibine al\u0131nma konusunda endi\u015fe etmesi gerekmiyor. Yine de M\u00fcller’in Almanya’daki sorguya gelmeyece\u011fi varsay\u0131l\u0131yor. Eyalet Kriminal Dairesi’de kriminal ba\u015fkomiser olan tan\u0131k K., M\u00fcller ile ge\u00e7en haftalarda M\u00fcnih’te mahkemeye ifade vermesi hakk\u0131nda dolay\u0131 telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. K., M\u00fcller’in ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta M\u00fcnih’te ifade vermeyi kabul etti\u011fini, ama daha sonra gelmek istemedi\u011fini \u00e7ok k\u0131sa \u015fekilde belirtti\u011fini anlatt\u0131. Muhtemelen tutuklanmama garantisinin, mahkemeye verece\u011fi yalan bir ifadeyi kapsamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n fark\u0131ndayd\u0131.<\/p>\n
Yine bug\u00fcn ifadesi al\u0131nan \u0130svi\u00e7reli eski hakim J.S., kendisine yap\u0131lan \u00e7ok say\u0131daki hatrlatmaya ra\u011fmen M\u00fcller’e silah ruhsatlar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan \u0130svi\u00e7reli san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunu hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcller’in eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n partneri oldu\u011fu iddia edilen Dieter S. bug\u00fcn 70 ya\u015f\u0131nda. S., 90’l\u0131 y\u0131llarda bir dondurmac\u0131ya sahip olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra \u015f\u00fcpheli i\u015flere de kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6rne\u011fin bir villan\u0131n g\u00f6zetlenmesi i\u00e7in “Rus adamlar\u0131” g\u00f6revlendirmi\u015fti. \u00c7ok \u015fey anlatt\u0131, ama bunlar\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirilebilecek pek bir \u015fey yoktu. Sonu\u00e7 olarak 90’l\u0131 y\u0131llarda iyi para kazanm\u0131\u015f, bunun \u00e7o\u011funu kaybetmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ve bir ara M\u00fcller’in eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131yla bir ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Silahlarla bir ilgisi olmas\u0131n\u0131 istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 silah kanununa kar\u015f\u0131 gelmekten dolay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen, ancak h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza davas\u0131ndan hat\u0131rlatmalar yap\u0131l\u0131nca, \u00f6fkeyle ve aleyhine konu\u015fan tan\u0131klara hakaret ederek kar\u015f\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131ya ge\u00e7ti. Tan\u0131k fazla inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olmasa da, sorgusu M\u00fcller’in dikkat da\u011f\u0131tma manevras\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmeye yaramad\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bir kez daha Ceska’n\u0131n teslimat\u0131na dair Delillerin \u015fu ana kadarki durumuna g\u00f6re cinayet tabancas\u0131 Ceska’y\u0131 sat\u0131n al\u0131p Almanya’ya satan \u0130svi\u00e7reli Hans-Ulrich M\u00fcller, \u0130svi\u00e7re’deki sorgusu esnas\u0131nda bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131na eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 S.I. ve Apolda’dan uzak bir tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan Dieter S.’nin esas Ceska sat\u0131c\u0131lar olduklar\u0131 (bkz. 22.10.2014 tarihli blog) iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftu. M\u00fcller’in bu iddias\u0131n\u0131n tek […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}