\u0130lk olarak tan\u0131k Hans-Ulrich M\u00fcller\u2019in 24.06.2014 tarihinde \u0130svi\u00e7re\u2019de Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kapsam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen sorgusunun tutana\u011f\u0131 okundu. M\u00fcller bu sorguda ger\u00e7e\u011fi s\u00f6yleme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alt\u0131nda eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 veya ba\u015fka birinin olas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131yla ilgili bilgi vermedi. Ceska 83\u2019\u00fc M\u00fcller\u2019in \u0130svi\u00e7reli arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n silah ruhsat\u0131yla alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funa yine itiraz etti. Ama M\u00fcller\u2019in arkada\u015f\u0131 bunu sorgusunda bu \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Ard\u0131ndan san\u0131k Carsten Schultze bir kez daha muhbir Brandt ve onun muhbir y\u00f6neticisi Wie\u00dfner\u2019in verdi\u011fi bilgilerle ilgili sorguland\u0131. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n niyetinin Brandt\u2019\u0131n ifadelelerinin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fini sorgulamak oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Brandt\u2019\u0131n anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Schultze\u2019nin ortadan kaybolan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc i\u00e7in para transferinde bulundu\u011fu da vard\u0131. Carsten Schultze, Brandt\u2019\u0131n verdi\u011fi ve onu B\u00f6hnhardt, Mundlos ve Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019ye daha da yakla\u015ft\u0131ran bilgilere itiraz etti. Schultze, di\u011fer bilgiler s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc, oysa ki Brandt\u2019\u0131n anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 tamamen do\u011fru olabilirdi.<\/p>\n
Son olarak davada san\u0131k temilcisi olarak bulunan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Weingarten tan\u0131k olarak sorguland\u0131. Sorguda tan\u0131k Enrico Theile\u2019nin haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131ndaki sorgusu konu oldu. Theile o sorguda, \u201csilahlar\u0131n\u201d hepsinin \u201cM\u00fcller\u201dden geldi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015fti. Orada mevcut olan polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n Weingarten\u2019\u0131n o esnada sesini y\u00fckseltti\u011fini ifadelerinde s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle Wohlleben\u2019in savunmas\u0131 yasak olan sorgu y\u00f6ntemlerinin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Weingarten o zaman ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sorguyu tutanakta kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Tan\u0131k Theile hakl\u0131 olarak \u201cpolis konusunda deneyimli\u201d olarak tan\u0131mlanabilirdi; ba\u011f\u0131ran bir ba\u015fsavc\u0131n\u0131n onu bir \u015fekilde etki alt\u0131nda b\u0131rakmas\u0131 s\u00fcrpriz olurdu. Theile\u2019nin de imzalamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgu tutana\u011f\u0131ndan da bu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n
Son olarak savunma ve m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar, muhbir Kai Dalek\u2019in sorgusuyla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundular. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131nda Dalek\u2019in Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi g\u00f6revlileriyle yap\u0131lan pazarl\u0131klara dair verdi\u011fi bilgilerden hangi sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131labilece\u011fini ortaya koydular:<\/p>\n
\u201cDalek\u2019in \u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda fiilen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olarak kendisini g\u00f6reviyle tamamen \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015ftirdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Kendisi ve bununla birlikte Bavyera Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin silahlardan, patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddeden, genelde Th\u00fcringen Neonazi camias\u0131nda artan bir askerile\u015fme ve radikalle\u015fme ile \u00f6zelde \u201cTh\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma\u201dn\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan (gerekli \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmadan) haberleri olmas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki bir itiraf\u0131 kendisinin ve Bavyera Eyaleti Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na g\u00f6lge d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcrd\u00fc. Tan\u0131k Dalek\u2019in polis taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen sorgusunda Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma\u2019n\u0131n askeri bir kolunun kurulmas\u0131, at\u0131\u015f talimleri ve silahlarla patlay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili t\u00fcm somut sorular ve hat\u0131rlatmalardan ka\u00e7mas\u0131 ve o zaman verdi\u011fi cevaplar\u0131 g\u00f6recele\u015ftirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 da bu arka plan g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak de\u011ferlendirilmeliydi.<\/p>\n
Dalek buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k Brandt\u2019\u0131n Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nin ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131 ve muhbirlerini ceza takibinden korudu\u011funu do\u011frulad\u0131. Dalek de muhbir y\u00f6neticisinin onu Bavyera\u2019da soru\u015fturma \u00f6nlemlerinden koruyabilece\u011fini, ama Th\u00fcringen\u2019de bir etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ifadesinde belirtmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k Neonazi camias\u0131ndaki faaliyetinin Bavyera\u2019daki muhbir y\u00f6neticileriyle yak\u0131n ili\u015fki i\u00e7erisinde koordine edildi\u011fini anlatt\u0131. G\u00f6revleri aras\u0131nda Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma\u2019n\u0131n Frankonya\u2019ya do\u011fru geni\u015flemesini engellemek vard\u0131 ki bunu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015fti. Brandt\u2019\u0131n da politik faaliyetlerini ve askerile\u015fmeyi Th\u00fcringen Dairesi ile ortakla\u015fa kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaym\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130fadesinin i\u00e7 y\u00fcz\u00fc g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Bavyera Eyaleti Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi\u2019nde Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma\u2019n\u0131n faaliyetlerine dair kapsaml\u0131 raporlar oldu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde \u015fiddet, askerile\u015fme ve eylemlerle ilgili taktik tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yordu.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ve bir kez daha: Ceska 83\u2019\u00fcn tedarik kanal\u0131 ve muhbir ifadelerinin de\u011feri \u0130lk olarak tan\u0131k Hans-Ulrich M\u00fcller\u2019in 24.06.2014 tarihinde \u0130svi\u00e7re\u2019de Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kapsam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen sorgusunun tutana\u011f\u0131 okundu. M\u00fcller bu sorguda ger\u00e7e\u011fi s\u00f6yleme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alt\u0131nda eski k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 veya ba\u015fka birinin olas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131yla ilgili bilgi vermedi. Ceska 83\u2019\u00fc M\u00fcller\u2019in \u0130svi\u00e7reli arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n silah ruhsat\u0131yla […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}