Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131k Schultze ile konu\u015fmalar\u0131 hak\u0131\u0131nda bilgi veren bir D\u00fcsseldorf Gen\u00e7lik Mahkemesi Adli Yard\u0131m\u0131’ndan bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n raporu ile \u00e7ok sakin \u015fekilde ba\u015flad\u0131. Schultze’nin kendisinin zaten kapsaml\u0131 bilgiler vermesinin ard\u0131ndan bu tan\u0131ktan \u00f6\u011frenilecek fazla yeni bilgi yoktu. \u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki haftalarda Schultze’nin olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u0131rada hala bir gen\u00e7 olarak de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi sorusuyla ilgilenen bir bilirki\u015fi raporu haz\u0131rlanacak.<\/p>\n
Ard\u0131ndan “Blood and Honour” Saksonya’dan merkezi bir ki\u015filik olan Andreas Graupner tan\u0131k olarak sorguland\u0131. O da Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle 8.10.1998 tarihinde Wilsdruff’da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve NSU’ya destek verilmesine karar verilen bir “B&H” toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Uwe Mundlos ve Uwe B\u00f6hnhardt’\u0131n bulundu\u011funa dair tan\u0131kl\u0131k etmesi gerekiyordu.<\/p>\n
2011’den bu yana Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg’de ya\u015fayan Graupner, “B&H”ye yak\u0131n duran Noie Werte m\u00fczik grubunun \u00fcyesi olarak \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131nda bilinirlik kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. NSU’nun i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funu \u00fcstlendi\u011fi, Fr\u00fchlingstra\u00dfe’deki bilgisayarlarda bulunan videolardaki m\u00fczik bu gruba aitti. Ayr\u0131ca grubun ba\u015fka bir \u00fcyesi k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre Wohlleben’in avukat\u0131 Schneiders’le ayn\u0131 avukatl\u0131k b\u00fcrosunda avukat olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Ama Graupner Wohlleben’i korumaya hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131, aksine kendinden \u00f6nce ifade veren bir\u00e7ok Nazi tan\u0131k gibi davrand\u0131: utanmaz, hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek aldatmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, yalanc\u0131. \u0130ki kez a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde yalan ifade vererek tavr\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekinmeden s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc. Heyet Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Hakim G\u00f6tzl bu tan\u0131ktan bir \u015fey \u00f6\u011frenme \u00e7abalar\u0131na olduk\u00e7a h\u0131zl\u0131 \u015fekilde son verdi. Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131 da yine h\u0131zl\u0131 \u015fekilde ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131. Sadece m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131 Lunnebach yalan\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyup Nazi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinden a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde bahsederek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine \u015fa\u015f\u0131rtmay\u0131 ba\u015fard\u0131. Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n “\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn radikalle\u015fmesinin” su\u00e7unu “B&H” Saksonya’ya y\u00fckleyip bununla Wohlleben’i aklama stratejisi ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011frad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Son olarak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131, ge\u00e7en hafta duyurdu\u011fu ve bu blogun iki yazar\u0131ndan biri olan avukat Alexander Hoffmann’\u0131 ve m\u00fcvekkilini davadan \u00e7\u0131karma amac\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcden dilek\u00e7elerini verdi.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil dava izninin iptal edilmesi ger\u00e7ekten de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn, ama bu sadece m\u00fcdahil davan\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu durumlarda m\u00fcmk\u00fcn, \u00f6rne\u011fin bir dava dilek\u00e7esinin eksik olmas\u0131 durumunda. Ancak Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131 ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz haftalar\u0131n delillerinin ma\u011fdurun \u00e7ivili bomba arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bir cinayet te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc veya tehlikeli bir yaralanman\u0131n kurban\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bomban\u0131n onun evinden 22 metre uzakl\u0131kta patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ediyor.<\/p>\n
Ama sadece bu sebep m\u00fcdahil dava izninin iptaline yol a\u00e7amaz \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc mahkeme somut tehlike, bomban\u0131n etki alan\u0131 ve yaralanma ile ilgili sorulara ancak h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan cevap verecek. Ve m\u00fcdahil davan\u0131n me\u015frulu\u011funa dair hukuki sorulara mahkeme, esas duru\u015fmay\u0131 a\u00e7ma ve b\u00f6ylece Keupstra\u00dfe’deki sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan fiziksel yaralanmaya maruz kalmayan ama Keupstra\u00dfe civar\u0131nda bulunan \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik bir cinayet te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc olarak de\u011ferlendirme karar\u0131yla zaten cevab\u0131n\u0131 vermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
M\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131 Lunnebach g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirerek Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n enerjilerini kendilerini rahats\u0131z eden m\u00fcdahil dava temsilcileriyle sava\u015fmak yerine m\u00fcvekkillerini savunan dilek\u00e7elere saklamalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Wohlleben halen aklanm\u0131yor. Ve:\u00a0 Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n rahats\u0131zl\u0131k veren bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131ndan kurtulma \u00e7abas\u0131 Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131k Schultze ile konu\u015fmalar\u0131 hak\u0131\u0131nda bilgi veren bir D\u00fcsseldorf Gen\u00e7lik Mahkemesi Adli Yard\u0131m\u0131’ndan bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n raporu ile \u00e7ok sakin \u015fekilde ba\u015flad\u0131. Schultze’nin kendisinin zaten kapsaml\u0131 bilgiler vermesinin ard\u0131ndan bu tan\u0131ktan \u00f6\u011frenilecek fazla yeni bilgi yoktu. \u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki haftalarda Schultze’nin olaylar\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}