{"id":812,"date":"2015-02-10T23:59:20","date_gmt":"2015-02-10T22:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=812"},"modified":"2015-02-11T15:20:07","modified_gmt":"2015-02-11T14:20:07","slug":"10-02-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/02\/10\/10-02-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"10.02.2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ve yine hat\u0131rlama g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7eken bir tan\u0131k<\/h4>\n

Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Keupstra\u00dfe’deki \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka bir ma\u011fduru ifade verdi. Bu ki\u015fi bomban\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kuaf\u00f6r salonunun m\u00fc\u015fterisiydi. Mucizevi \u015fekilde yaralanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131; o esnada yan\u0131nda olan k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131nda kesikler, yan\u0131klar, kulak zar\u0131nda hasar vard\u0131 ve \u00f6nemli psikolojik sorunlar ya\u015fam\u0131\u015ft\u0131: “Patlaman\u0131n sonras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcnlerde sadece telefon \u00e7ald\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile yerinden s\u0131\u00e7r\u0131yordu.” Bu tan\u0131k da ba\u015fka bir zaman ifade vermek \u00fczere \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ard\u0131ndan, ge\u00e7en hafta verilen ve avukat Hoffmann’\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin m\u00fcdahil dava yetkisini elinden almaya y\u00f6nelik dilek\u00e7eyle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirildi. Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n cinayet te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ma\u011fduru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ama her ihtimalde tehlikeli bir yaralama te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kurban\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve bu y\u00fczden m\u00fcdahil dava hakk\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fini belirtti. Hoffmann dilek\u00e7enin hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu y\u00fczden aslen propaganda yapmaya yarad\u0131\u011f\u0131 izleniminin olu\u015ftu\u011funu bir kez daha a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. S\u00f6zlerini \u015f\u00f6yle sonland\u0131rd\u0131:<\/p>\n

“Bomban\u0131n patlama etkisine dair bilirki\u015fi raporu hen\u00fcz haz\u0131rlanmadan bir m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fdurlu\u011funu sorgulamaya y\u00f6nelik bu \u00e7aba, sadece az say\u0131daki a\u011f\u0131r yaral\u0131y\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek kurbanlar\u0131 kabul ederek sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc boyutunu gizlemeyi hedefliyor. Hesaplanan \u015fu: Bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda bomban\u0131n dolays\u0131z olarak yak\u0131n\u0131nda bulunan ve sadece tesad\u00fcf eseri bomban\u0131n par\u00e7alar\u0131na maruz kalmayan bir ki\u015finin bomba ma\u011furu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilirse sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n Keupstra\u00dfe’nin t\u00fcm sakinlerine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu geri planda kal\u0131r. Keupstra\u00dfe’deki \u00e7ivili bomban\u0131n patlama y\u00f6n\u00fc kelimenin tam anlam\u0131yla ter\u00f6re i\u015faret ediyor. Bu tespit san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’yi de a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde zan alt\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131yor. Savunmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e sadece bu ger\u00e7e\u011fi sapt\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik olabilir. Geri \u00e7evrilmesi gerekiyor.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Avukat P\u0131nar bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131larak ilaveten \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n nefret su\u00e7u ve g\u00f6\u00e7men niteliklerinden dolay\u0131 g\u00f6\u00e7menlere y\u00f6nelik sald\u0131r\u0131 karakterine dikkat \u00e7ekti. Zsch\u00e4pe ve Wohlleben’in savunmalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n bu karakterinin daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde tan\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemedi. Ba\u015fka m\u00fcdahil dava avukatlar\u0131 da avukat Hoffmann’\u0131n ifadelerine kat\u0131ld\u0131lar.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme ak\u015fam\u00fcst\u00fc, 3.2.205<\/a>‘te ifade vermi\u015f olan Nazi tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusuna devam etti. \u0130lk sorguda oldu\u011fu gibi pek hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc, ama kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olaylar\u0131 kesin \u015fekilde yalanlamaktan da ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131. Sabit olarak tekrarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 basmakal\u0131p s\u00f6zler “reddetmek istemiyorum”, “m\u00fcmk\u00fcn”, “\u00f6yle olmu\u015f olabilir” idi. B\u00f6hnhardt, Mundlos, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Jenal\u0131 yolda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n 1990’lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana Chemnitz’le ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu bir kez daha a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k kazand\u0131. \u00d6zellikle de Wohlleben’in savunmas\u0131n\u0131n delil iddialar\u0131 (Chemnitzli tan\u0131klar\u0131n Wohlleben’i tan\u0131m\u0131yor oldu\u011fu, “\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc”n\u00fcn Chemnitz’de di\u011fer \u00e7evrelerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak radikalle\u015fti\u011fi vs.) do\u011frulanmad\u0131. Aksine tan\u0131k bir polis sorgusunda Wohlleben’i “Th\u00fcringenli Wolle” olarak te\u015fhis etti\u011fini onaylamak durumunda kald\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ve yine hat\u0131rlama g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7eken bir tan\u0131k Bug\u00fcn ilk olarak Keupstra\u00dfe’deki \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka bir ma\u011fduru ifade verdi. Bu ki\u015fi bomban\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kuaf\u00f6r salonunun m\u00fc\u015fterisiydi. Mucizevi \u015fekilde yaralanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131; o esnada yan\u0131nda olan k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131nda kesikler, yan\u0131klar, kulak zar\u0131nda hasar vard\u0131 ve \u00f6nemli psikolojik sorunlar ya\u015fam\u0131\u015ft\u0131: “Patlaman\u0131n sonras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcnlerde sadece […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/812\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}