M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 12 \u015eubat 2015’te verdi\u011fi kararla Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bir m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahil dava yetkisinin iptali i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyi beklendi\u011fi \u00fczere reddetti. Avukat Hoffman davada kalacak.<\/p>\n
Bu karar\u0131n verilmesi bekleniyordu. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana tamamen bir dikkati da\u011f\u0131tma manevras\u0131yd\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukatlar\u0131 bu dilek\u00e7eyle kendilerine rahats\u0131zl\u0131k veren bir m\u00fcdahil dava avukat\u0131n\u0131 davadan \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131lar. Ama as\u0131l mesele sadece az say\u0131daki a\u011f\u0131r yaral\u0131 \u015fahs\u0131 olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ek kurbanlar\u0131 olarak kabul ederek K\u00f6ln’deki Keupsta\u00dfe’de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u00e7ivili bomba sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcmc\u00fcl boyutunu gizleme \u00e7abas\u0131yd\u0131. Sald\u0131r\u0131 esnas\u0131nda bomban\u0131n dolays\u0131z olarak yak\u0131n\u0131nda bulunan ve sadece tesad\u00fcfen bomban\u0131n par\u00e7alar\u0131na maruz kalmayan bir \u015fahs\u0131n bomban\u0131n ma\u011fduru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile bu sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n Keupstra\u00dfe’nin t\u00fcm sakinlerine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fi geri planda kalacakt\u0131.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme heyeti karara gerek\u00e7e olarak m\u00fcdahil dava izni verilirken m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ivili bomban\u0131n etki alan\u0131nda bulundu\u011fundan ve b\u00f6ylelikle san\u0131k Zsch\u00e4pe’nin yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan yola \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterdi. Dava delillerinin bunu kan\u0131tlay\u0131p kan\u0131tlamamas\u0131 (Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131 kan\u0131tlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrmek i\u00e7i sayfalarca yaz\u0131 yazd\u0131) karar i\u00e7in \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
S.’nin m\u00fcdahil dava yetkisinin iptali ve avukat\u0131 Alexander Hoffmann’\u0131n davadan al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen dilek\u00e7e reddedildi M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 12 \u015eubat 2015’te verdi\u011fi kararla Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bir m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahil dava yetkisinin iptali i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyi beklendi\u011fi \u00fczere reddetti. Avukat Hoffman davada kalacak. Bu karar\u0131n verilmesi bekleniyordu. Zsch\u00e4pe’nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi ba\u015f\u0131ndan bu yana tamamen bir […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/822\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}