{"id":899,"date":"2015-06-10T23:50:17","date_gmt":"2015-06-10T21:50:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=899"},"modified":"2015-07-01T22:27:57","modified_gmt":"2015-07-01T20:27:57","slug":"10-06-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/06\/10\/10-06-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"10.06.2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

Zsch\u00e4pe yeni bir avukat tayin edilmesini istiyor II \u2013 Avukat Sturm gidecek<\/h4>\n

Uzun s\u00fcren gecikme ve aralar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Sturm’un g\u00f6revine son verilmesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Bunun sebepleri \u015fimidlik bilinmiyor. Duru\u015fma bunun \u00fczerine bug\u00fcnl\u00fck sona erdi.<\/p>\n

Zsch\u00e4pe daha ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz yaz, 16.7.2014’te avukatlar\u0131na art\u0131k g\u00fcvenmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Makhkeme taraf\u0131ndan atanan \u00fc\u00e7 avukat\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6revine son verilmesi i\u00e7in o zaman verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e, \u00fc\u00e7 hafta sonra sebep yetersizli\u011fi nedeniyle geri \u00e7evrilmi\u015f, Zsch\u00e4pe yeterli neden \u00f6ne s\u00fcrememi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revine bu \u015fekilde son verilmesi, sadece \u00f6nemli istisnalar halinde s\u00f6z konusu olabilir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc her \u00fc\u00e7 avukat\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin toplanmas\u0131n\u0131n tekrar edilmesini mecbur k\u0131lar. Ceza Muhakemeleri Us\u00fcl\u00fc Kanunu’na g\u00f6re sadece kal\u0131c\u0131 ve onar\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan ve savunman\u0131n uygun \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclece\u011fine dair endi\u015fe uyand\u0131ran bir g\u00fcven sars\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlayan gerek\u00e7eler bulundu\u011fu takdirde avukatlar g\u00f6revden al\u0131nabilir.<\/p>\n

Tahmin y\u00fcr\u00fctmeye gerek olmadan, \u015fimdiden Zsch\u00e4pe’nin b\u00f6yle gerek\u00e7eler g\u00f6steremeyece\u011fi varsay\u0131labilir. Dilek\u00e7esini bu kez ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7elendirebilecek mi merak ediyoruz. Yine de avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnden de kurtulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 art\u0131k kabul etti ve en az\u0131ndan kendi taraf\u0131nda duran yeni bir akt\u00f6r bulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

17.07.2014<\/a> tarihli blogdaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 bu noktada tekrarlamam\u0131z m\u00fcmk\u00fcn:<\/p>\n

\u201cZsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin tamamen yeni avukatlar edinmeye y\u00f6nelik iste\u011fi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyecek. Avukatlar\u0131ndan biri muhtemelen g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc olarak g\u00f6revinden vazge\u00e7ip onun yerine haz\u0131rl\u0131ks\u0131z olarak ge\u00e7en yeni bir avukata yer a\u00e7acak. Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc bir avukat atanmas\u0131 da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015filik yasal s\u0131n\u0131rlama sadece se\u00e7ilmi\u015f avukatlar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli. Mahkeme nas\u0131l karar verirse versin bu durumun dava s\u00fcrecinde b\u00fcy\u00fck bir d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcme yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyecek olan durum, Beate Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin ifade verip vermeyece\u011fi.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Yine de savunma \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn dava s\u00fcrecinde zaman zaman g\u00f6sterdikleri tav\u0131r ger\u00e7ekten \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131. Yakla\u015f\u0131k bir seneden bu yana Zsch\u00e4pe’nin onlar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ele\u015ftirel yakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortada. Ama \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn verilen aralar ya da \u00f6\u011flen aralar\u0131nda Zsch\u00e4pe’ye \u00f6zel bir yak\u0131nl\u0131k g\u00f6stermemeleri anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r de\u011fil. Sigara i\u00e7mek ya da mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcndeki kameralar onlar i\u00e7in giderek daha \u00f6nemli bir hal al\u0131yor gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

Bu sabah da kafa kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran bir manzara ya\u015fand\u0131: Avukatlar m\u00fcvekkillerini \u00f6nce tek ba\u015f\u0131na mahkeme salonunda beklettiler, ard\u0131ndan onunla heyecanl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde konu\u015ftular ve Zsch\u00e4pe sadece kafa sallayarak onaylad\u0131. Avukat Heer’in, savunman\u0131n m\u00fcvekille g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilmesi i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine uzunca bir ara verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan Zsch\u00e4pe ilk olarak tek ba\u015f\u0131na h\u00fccre y\u00f6n\u00fcnde y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc; Sturm, Stahl ve Heer \u00f6nce mahkeme binas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde aralar\u0131nda konu\u015ftular ve daha sonra avukat odas\u0131nda Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcler. O esnada Zsch\u00e4pe’nin Avukat Sturm’un g\u00f6revine son verilmesine dair verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7eden haberlerinin olmas\u0131 gerekiyordu. B\u00f6ylesi bir durumda Federal Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmenin neden m\u00fcvekkilleriyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmekten daha \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu anlamak ise pek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Zsch\u00e4pe yeni bir avukat tayin edilmesini istiyor II \u2013 Avukat Sturm gidecek Uzun s\u00fcren gecikme ve aralar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131, Zsch\u00e4pe’nin avukat\u0131 Sturm’un g\u00f6revine son verilmesi i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Bunun sebepleri \u015fimidlik bilinmiyor. Duru\u015fma bunun \u00fczerine bug\u00fcnl\u00fck sona erdi. Zsch\u00e4pe daha ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz yaz, 16.7.2014’te avukatlar\u0131na art\u0131k g\u00fcvenmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Makhkeme taraf\u0131ndan atanan \u00fc\u00e7 avukat\u0131n\u0131n da […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=899"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":915,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899\/revisions\/915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}